when the administration ignores the USSC

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by DKSuddeth, Aug 9, 2004.

  1. DKSuddeth

    DKSuddeth Senior Member

    Oct 20, 2003
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    North Texas
    what to do? DoJ defies Supreme Court

    CHARLESTON, S.C. - A month after the U.S. Supreme Court said people held as enemy combatants may challenge their detention, a defense lawyer still is trying to meet with a man who has been held for more than a year at the Charleston Naval Consolidated Brig.

    Attorney Andy Savage filed a motion in federal court last week demanding to see Ali Seleh al-Marri, a native of Qatar who has been held without access to family, friends or attorneys.

    "The Supreme Court's decision is clear: There's no wiggle room," Savage said Monday.

    Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to hold someone indefinitely and said detainees should be able to challenge the government.

    "He is in fact a civilian, not a combatant," said Savage's motion, which also demands government either release al-Marri or charge him with a crime.

    Citing the Supreme Court decision, al-Marri's attorneys had asked Assistant Solicitor General David Salmons earlier this month about seeing their client and were told the government still could not allow him to see a lawyer, according to the latest motion.

    Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the Justice Department, refused to comment.

    Al-Marri has not received as much publicity as two other brig detainees, Yaser Hamdi, the man whose case led to the Supreme Court decision, and Jose Padilla. The two others were both born in the United States.

    In December 2001, federal agents searched al-Marri's apartment in Illinois and allegedly found a computer with lectures by Osama bin Laden, bookmarked Web sites about industrial chemicals and hundreds of credit card numbers.

    The government alleged al-Marri, who was studying at Bradley University in Peoria, Ill., was a sleeper cell operative and that calls were made from his cell phone number to an al-Qaida lieutenant who sent money to the Sept. 11 hijackers.

    He was charged with credit card and bank fraud. Al-Marri was allowed to see his attorney and was supposed to go to trial last year, but prosecutors dropped the charges and the government designated him an enemy combatant.
  2. Annie

    Annie Diamond Member

    Nov 22, 2003
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    This was based on Hamdi v Donald Rumsfeld. I've been reading that it might actually have increased the power of the executive. I thought WSJ had something, but I'm not finding it, yet ;) . Scroll down to Thurs., July 1. Just Once More is the title.


    Tried to do a bit of checking on this, here is one take:


Share This Page