When Romney wins the nomonation what will those of you on the right that h8 em do?

[Paulie]

Romney has been the front runner for some time now and apparently Newt has lit a fire in your collective asses. So when he wins what do you do then? If Romney is to liberal for you will you just sit it out and LET Obama, who is ten times further to the left, have another term?

Many say we only got one shot to repeal O'care so does that even matter to you?

He isn't my first choice but by god he is miles ahead on the list as compared to Obama.

I'm not going to say I'm at all surprised that you're already caving and settling for mediocrity.

 

[dblack]

You seem to be assuming all third parties are 'propellerhead' (whatever that means) and not worth the time. How come?

I am assuming nothing. I am intimately familiar with the third parties. They are all propellerheads.

Okay. If that's your opinion, then not voting makes sense. But the if the Libertarians nominate someone worthwhile (Johnson, Paul, etc...) they'll definitely get my vote.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Don'tBeEvenMarginallyIntelligent would be a better name for that ass clown.

What a tool.

Hmm. You make a compelling point. I didn't realize you were so passionate about employers who screw workers out of money.

 

[SFC Ollie]

You seem to be assuming all third parties are 'propellerhead' (whatever that means) and not worth the time. How come?

I am assuming nothing. I am intimately familiar with the third parties. They are all propellerheads.

Okay. If that's your opinion, then not voting makes sense. But the if the Libertarians nominate someone worthwhile (Johnson, Paul, etc...) they'll definitely get my vote.

And if they do and you do, then they and you will only help ensure 4 more years of this so called transparency....

 

[The T]

It's actually quite simple, if Romney gets the nomination then he has the best shot to beat Obama.

In an Obama vs Romney vote I will once again vote against the worst of 2 evils and vote Romney.

Those of you who do otherwise are simply giving Obama another 4 years to not lead the country....

It's already fucked up enough because of the great divider, we need to get him out of there at nearly any cost.....

I'm pretty sure that if I don't vote for either Obama or Romney, that I'm not helping either Obama or Romney.

A stay at home or a 3rd party vote will be a boost for Obama. And you can bet he's counting on a lot of that.....

Of course they are, and the willing accomplices in the media are doing thier damndest to make it happen.

Shame that there are so many fools that can't see past the scam of the left.

 

[The T]

Don'tBeEvenMarginallyIntelligent would be a better name for that ass clown.

What a tool.

Hmm. You make a compelling point. I didn't realize you were so passionate about employers who screw workers out of money.

Did he? or are you taking the medias' word for it?

 

[dblack]

I am assuming nothing. I am intimately familiar with the third parties. They are all propellerheads.

Okay. If that's your opinion, then not voting makes sense. But the if the Libertarians nominate someone worthwhile (Johnson, Paul, etc...) they'll definitely get my vote.

And if they do and you do, then they and you will only help ensure 4 more years of this so called transparency....

So would voting for Romney. At least this way, my vote isn't wasted on someone I disagree with.

 

[Paulie]

You seem to be assuming all third parties are 'propellerhead' (whatever that means) and not worth the time. How come?

I am assuming nothing. I am intimately familiar with the third parties. They are all propellerheads.

Since I am a right wing right wing conservative from waaaaay back, there is no way I would vote for any of the left wing third parties. If I don't like Democrats, I sure as shit won't vote for third parties that are even more commie than they are.

As for the third parties on the right, I have known Libertarians for going on 4 decades now. I know the LP platform upside down and backwards, as well as every argument they have ever made.

Just as I would not vote for the left loony parties because they believe in the total nanny state, I would not vote for the right loony parties because they believe everyone will work in everyone else's best interest through the magical Invisible Hand if we just give it a chance.

No thanks to both.

You seem confused. You call yourself a right winger from way back, and then go on to discredit the very idea of Adam Smith, who's considered the pioneer of the ideology of free market economics. That you limit it to libertarians is strange, because it's the basic belief by which the whole ideology of free markets originates from.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Don'tBeEvenMarginallyIntelligent would be a better name for that ass clown.

What a tool.

Hmm. You make a compelling point. I didn't realize you were so passionate about employers who screw workers out of money.

Did he? or are you taking the medias' word for it?

Well, Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which strengthens employees' protections against employers who illegal under pay them. You guys are crying about all the damage Obama has done. So, it makes sense then that you think the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is damaging and you side with employers who illegally under pay.

Why?

 

[The T]

Okay. If that's your opinion, then not voting makes sense. But the if the Libertarians nominate someone worthwhile (Johnson, Paul, etc...) they'll definitely get my vote.

And if they do and you do, then they and you will only help ensure 4 more years of this so called transparency....

So would voting for Romney. At least this way, my vote isn't wasted on someone I disagree with.

Unfortunately? The voters of this bnation that were hurt by both Bush AND Obama are relegated to voting for Obama or A B O...*Anybody BUT Obama...

 

[The T]

Hmm. You make a compelling point. I didn't realize you were so passionate about employers who screw workers out of money.

Did he? or are you taking the medias' word for it?

Well, Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which strengthens employees' protections against employers who illegal under pay them. You guys are crying about all the damage Obama has done. So, it makes sense then that you think the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is damaging and you side with employers who illegally under pay.

Why?

And WHAt business is it of government what people get paid in a free market?

That's correct... *NONE*

YOU adhere to Socialist bullsqueeze.

 

[pvsi.]

When Romney wins the nomonation what will those of you on the right that h8 em do?

Wait for him to lose to Obama, not because I like Obama, but because it's exact same thing, and it will further prove how the socialist media backs the biggest idiots on purpose

 

[DontBeStupid]

Did he? or are you taking the medias' word for it?

Well, Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which strengthens employees' protections against employers who illegal under pay them. You guys are crying about all the damage Obama has done. So, it makes sense then that you think the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is damaging and you side with employers who illegally under pay.

Why?

And WHAt business is it of government what people get paid in a free market?

That's correct... *NONE*

YOU adhere to Socialist bullsqueeze.

Well, there we go. You think companies should be able illegally under pay employees and employees not have any recourse.

Guess we know which side you're on then.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Hmm. You make a compelling point. I didn't realize you were so passionate about employers who screw workers out of money.

Did he? or are you taking the medias' word for it?

Well, Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which strengthens employees' protections against employers who illegal under pay them. You guys are crying about all the damage Obama has done. So, it makes sense then that you think the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is damaging and you side with employers who illegally under pay.

Why?

Which did what? Changed the statute of limitations on filing, and marked the first Bill that Obama signed and the first campaign promise that he broke.....

 

[dblack]

When Romney wins the nomonation what will those of you on the right that h8 em do?

Wait for him to lose to Obama, not because I like Obama, but because it's exact same thing, and it will further prove how the socialist media backs the biggest idiots on purpose

It's not just the socialist media. Look at top contributors to each of their campaigns. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan - these aren't left wing media interests. The most powerful interests in this country do this every election. They ensure that each major party nominates someone 'safe' (ie no threat to the status quo) and then let us choose between them. Then they let the lesser-of-two evils nonsense scare the morons into supporting their selected candidates.

 

[The T]

Well, Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which strengthens employees' protections against employers who illegal under pay them. You guys are crying about all the damage Obama has done. So, it makes sense then that you think the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is damaging and you side with employers who illegally under pay.

Why?

And WHAt business is it of government what people get paid in a free market?

That's correct... *NONE*

YOU adhere to Socialist bullsqueeze.

Well, there we go. You think companies should be able illegally under pay employees and employees not have any recourse.

Guess we know which side you're on then.

They have recourse as adults...

*Don't work there*

Simple don't ya think? Isn't individual liberty a grand thing?

YOU are a whiney frump that can't handle his own affairs and are scared of your own liberty and I belive can't make a decision without someone in Gubmint holding your hand.

Quit being stupid and grow up.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Did he? or are you taking the medias' word for it?

Well, Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which strengthens employees' protections against employers who illegal under pay them. You guys are crying about all the damage Obama has done. So, it makes sense then that you think the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is damaging and you side with employers who illegally under pay.

Why?

Which did what? Changed the statute of limitations on filing, and marked the first Bill that Obama signed and the first campaign promise that he broke.....

And which "promise" would that be?

 

[Wacky Quacky]

I'm pretty sure that if I don't vote for either Obama or Romney, that I'm not helping either Obama or Romney.

A stay at home or a 3rd party vote will be a boost for Obama. And you can bet he's counting on a lot of that.....

Of course they are, and the willing accomplices in the media are doing thier damndest to make it happen.

Shame that there are so many fools that can't see past the scam of the left.

Funny, I was just thinking the same of all of you "2 party system" voters. The way you guys vote is even a noted logical fallacy:

either-or fallacy:
Logical fallacy in which the writer states that only two alternatives exist when in fact there are more than two.

 

[DontBeStupid]

Quit being stupid and grow up.

I will, as soon as you quit supporting employers who knowingly break the law.

 

[Paulie]

When Romney wins the nomonation what will those of you on the right that h8 em do?

Wait for him to lose to Obama, not because I like Obama, but because it's exact same thing, and it will further prove how the socialist media backs the biggest idiots on purpose

It's not just the socialist media. Look at top contributors to each of their campaigns. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan - these aren't left wing media interests. The most powerful interests in this country do this every election. They ensure that each major party nominates someone 'safe' (ie no threat to the status quo) and then let us choose between them. Then they let the lesser-of-two evils nonsense scare the morons into supporting their selected candidates.

The worst part about it is that most people are aware of it and still knowingly and willingly contribute to it.