When Do We Finally Say...

[fyrenza]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

 

[blastoff]

I give up.

 

[fyrenza]

Why?

Don't YOU "have?"

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Were Americans, we borrow.

 

[Avatar4321]

That would be a lie.

Saying we are strong doesn't make us strong. In fact, we are weaker than we've ever been because we've allowed corruption to infiltrate our every aspect of society. We need to stop corruption and the best way to do that is with ourselves. We need to build our own strength and self reliance and then reach out and help others.

 

[del]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

when we all get pre-frontal lobotomies, just like you.

don't hold your breath

 

[Shogun]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

when we all get pre-frontal lobotomies, just like you.

don't hold your breath

.....musloooms....

 

[B. Kidd]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

Sell this to the crowd of 30,000 people who showed up yesterday in Atlanta for the Section 8 waiting list.

 

[uscitizen]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

As politicians have proven over and over.
Talk is cheap.
Walking the talk is not so easy.

 

[Gunny]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

After we pay off Obama's debt and drill for our own oil where we have it instead of being the only pussies in the world not doing it.

 

[George Costanza]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

After we pay off Obama's debt and drill for our own oil where we have it instead of being the only pussies in the world not doing it.

Obama's debt????

OK . . . .

 

[saveliberty]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

We're Americans: When we kick out all the illegals.

We're strong: When we fight a war and either leave the enemy in total destruction or keep the land we fought in.

We don't need: When we pay our debts off.

We have: When we stop feeling the need to redistribute the wealth of others.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

After we pay off Obama's debt and drill for our own oil where we have it instead of being the only pussies in the world not doing it.

Obama's debt????

OK . . . .

Well who's trillion dollars debt is it? Who signed off on it? Are you one of those who blames Buoooooosh?

 

[Conspiracist]

We're Americans.

We're STRONG.

We don't NEED.

We HAVE.

After we pay off Obama's debt and drill for our own oil where we have it instead of being the only pussies in the world not doing it.

Obama's debt????

OK . . . .

Who built it up loony?

 

[uscitizen]

We have been saying that kind of stuff as the USA slid downhill.

I think action speaks louder than words.

 

[Woyzeck]

After we pay off Obama's debt and drill for our own oil where we have it instead of being the only pussies in the world not doing it.

Obama's debt????

OK . . . .

Well who's trillion dollars debt is it? Who signed off on it? Are you one of those who blames Buoooooosh?

The problem with saying it's Obama's debt, is that it implies there was no debt before Obama.

 

[saveliberty]

Obama's debt????

OK . . . .

Well who's trillion dollars debt is it? Who signed off on it? Are you one of those who blames Buoooooosh?

The problem with saying it's Obama's debt, is that it implies there was no debt before Obama.

No, it is simply a reference to that part of the debt 0bama incurred, promoted and created. We finally found something he can do really fast and well.

When economists start whipping out charts and graphs, you can be pretty sure they are lieing.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Obama's debt????

OK . . . .

Well who's trillion dollars debt is it? Who signed off on it? Are you one of those who blames Buoooooosh?

The problem with saying it's Obama's debt, is that it implies there was no debt before Obama.

It's obamas trillion dollar debt. and thats a fact.

 

[Woyzeck]

Well who's trillion dollars debt is it? Who signed off on it? Are you one of those who blames Buoooooosh?

The problem with saying it's Obama's debt, is that it implies there was no debt before Obama.

No, it is simply a reference to that part of the debt 0bama incurred, promoted and created. We finally found something he can do really fast and well.

When economists start whipping out charts and graphs, you can be pretty sure they are lieing.

But that just makes the phrase even weirder. If you are indeed referring to the debt incurred under Obama and only under him, why would you just want to get rid of what he incurred? Why not focus on getting rid of all the debt? That would seem a smarter thing to do and say. What you're saying here is essentially, you're going to get rid of the debt Obama incurred and then stop there.

Which is just stupid really, considering Obama didn't incur the entire debt.

 

[saveliberty]

The problem with saying it's Obama's debt, is that it implies there was no debt before Obama.

No, it is simply a reference to that part of the debt 0bama incurred, promoted and created. We finally found something he can do really fast and well.

When economists start whipping out charts and graphs, you can be pretty sure they are lieing.

But that just makes the phrase even weirder. If you are indeed referring to the debt incurred under Obama and only under him, why would you just want to get rid of what he incurred? Why not focus on getting rid of all the debt? That would seem a smarter thing to do and say. What you're saying here is essentially, you're going to get rid of the debt Obama incurred and then stop there.

Which is just stupid really, considering Obama didn't incur the entire debt.

LIFI or FIFO, you have to start somewhere. No one said anything about stopping at a particualr spot. Why must you imply so much or act so deliberately obtuse?