Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CDZ What's Your Brexit Hedge?
- Thread starter william the wie
- Start date
This mostly helps Ireland (Republic) and hurts the rich in the UK.When dreams become a reality!!!!!
Rule Britannia!!!!!
The rich in the UK are now forced to deal with their own poor and help them.
So the Labor Party has gotten lucky.
- Nov 3, 2012
- 37,635
- 4,526
- 1,170
Yes, but what is troublesome to me is that so many people didn't detect it. For the Russians among us here - it must be like shooting fish in a barrel. They tell people whatever they want to hear and suddenly Americans believe this is their new best friend (s).Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
It's just amazing how much old Soviet Cold War propaganda just keeps being recycled as 'fact' even today, especially by faux 'progressives' and Democrats in our own country.
I have decided to put him and the other ones on ignore to keep myself from temptation. I pray they be converted to Christ because apart from Jesus Christ they shall all perish. I cannot imagine being raised in the Soviet mindset of propaganda and lies. It will take a miracle to see them set free from it. One cannot live a life of deception, lies, hiding hatred in the heart without it eventually destroying them - even before they see hell.
And on the subject of hell..... there are many testimonies I have heard of people who had witnessed visions of people in hell who thought they would be rewarded for their service to Lucifer only to find that Jesus Christ holds the keys to hell and death and they've been duped. How could Satan reward anyone when he was stripped of his power at Calvary? Why would anyone believe Satan (or his workers) would keep his word or promise? Honesty is a virtue. Satan has no virtues. He is the Father of lies and those who serve him are living a lie that will eventually lead to their destruction. Sad but true.
This article gives a very good short summary of where it comes from for the 'New Left' and faux 'Progressive' neo-fascist racists of today.
Being Leftist and Anti-Semitic in Germany - Susanne Urban
they aren't interested in objectivity and facts, as that doesn't serve their petty agendas and Gramscian gibberish. These people are not Liberals, they are venal, infantile, degenerate vermin with zero morals and principles; make no mistake about it.
I will look at it. Thank you, Picaro. Good night.
Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised the UN that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
Last edited:
I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
Dissembling, now.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
those advisory rulings are meaningless gibberish; the people requesting them just hand them one sided arguments with no objective evidence, and then ask the judges how they would rule on the basis of the slanted premises, that's all; they don't ask for rebuttals or contrary arguments, and they aren't real cases, so your premise is just as ridiculous as your first one. IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple. They know they don't have one, and they know they themselves haven't complied with the vast majority of Resolutions in the past, nor do they intend to in the future. they've violated every single one of them, from water treaties to Oslo and beyond.
Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple.I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
Dissembling, now.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
those advisory rulings are meaningless gibberish; the people requesting them just hand them one sided arguments with no objective evidence, and then ask the judges how they would rule on the basis of the slanted premises, that's all; they don't ask for rebuttals or contrary arguments, and they aren't real cases, so your premise is just as ridiculous as your first one. IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple. They know they don't have one, and they know they themselves haven't complied with the vast majority of Resolutions in the past, nor do they intend to in the future. they've violated every single one of them, from water treaties to Oslo and beyond.
Palestinians have no recourse with the ICJ, they are not a member state.
IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple.I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
Dissembling, now.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
those advisory rulings are meaningless gibberish; the people requesting them just hand them one sided arguments with no objective evidence, and then ask the judges how they would rule on the basis of the slanted premises, that's all; they don't ask for rebuttals or contrary arguments, and they aren't real cases, so your premise is just as ridiculous as your first one. IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple. They know they don't have one, and they know they themselves haven't complied with the vast majority of Resolutions in the past, nor do they intend to in the future. they've violated every single one of them, from water treaties to Oslo and beyond.
Palestinians have no recourse with the ICJ, they are not a member state.
lol but you think the Wall 'ruling' was valid ... you're obviously contradicting yourself here.
Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
Prove me wrongIF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple.I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
Dissembling, now.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
those advisory rulings are meaningless gibberish; the people requesting them just hand them one sided arguments with no objective evidence, and then ask the judges how they would rule on the basis of the slanted premises, that's all; they don't ask for rebuttals or contrary arguments, and they aren't real cases, so your premise is just as ridiculous as your first one. IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple. They know they don't have one, and they know they themselves haven't complied with the vast majority of Resolutions in the past, nor do they intend to in the future. they've violated every single one of them, from water treaties to Oslo and beyond.
Palestinians have no recourse with the ICJ, they are not a member state.
Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
I'm not contradicting myself at all, you are just ignorant. The apartheid ruling was advisory, called for by the UN. The other type of case the court hears is a legal dispute (contentious case) which can only be convened between parties affiliated with the court. Either way the Palestinians have no recourse in and of themselves.IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple.I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
Dissembling, now.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
those advisory rulings are meaningless gibberish; the people requesting them just hand them one sided arguments with no objective evidence, and then ask the judges how they would rule on the basis of the slanted premises, that's all; they don't ask for rebuttals or contrary arguments, and they aren't real cases, so your premise is just as ridiculous as your first one. IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple. They know they don't have one, and they know they themselves haven't complied with the vast majority of Resolutions in the past, nor do they intend to in the future. they've violated every single one of them, from water treaties to Oslo and beyond.
Palestinians have no recourse with the ICJ, they are not a member state.
lol but you think the Wall 'ruling' was valid ... you're obviously contradicting yourself here.
I'm not contradicting myself at all, you are just ignorant. The apartheid ruling was advisory, called for by the UN. The other type of case the court hears is a legal dispute (contentious case) which can only be convened between parties affiliated with the court. Either way the Palestinians have no recourse in and of themselves.IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple.I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
Dissembling, now.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
those advisory rulings are meaningless gibberish; the people requesting them just hand them one sided arguments with no objective evidence, and then ask the judges how they would rule on the basis of the slanted premises, that's all; they don't ask for rebuttals or contrary arguments, and they aren't real cases, so your premise is just as ridiculous as your first one. IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple. They know they don't have one, and they know they themselves haven't complied with the vast majority of Resolutions in the past, nor do they intend to in the future. they've violated every single one of them, from water treaties to Oslo and beyond.
Palestinians have no recourse with the ICJ, they are not a member state.
lol but you think the Wall 'ruling' was valid ... you're obviously contradicting yourself here.
Keep changing that story!. It only makes you look more dishonest and ridiculous. The Posting Last!! game isn't going to help you any.
Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
Show where I have changed my story. Go on, start at the beginning of the thread. I'll wait.....I'm not contradicting myself at all, you are just ignorant. The apartheid ruling was advisory, called for by the UN. The other type of case the court hears is a legal dispute (contentious case) which can only be convened between parties affiliated with the court. Either way the Palestinians have no recourse in and of themselves.IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple.I never said the ICJ doesn't make rulings, that would be stupid, it is a court after all. What I said was they are not a criminal court and it is a statement of fact backed by the ICJ itself.
3. What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
The ICJ can hear two types of cases. Contentious cases, a legal dispute between two members of the court (which excludes Palestine) and advisory cases which can be initiated by the UN. Palestine in and of itself has no recourse with the ICJ, it is a simple fact.
Dissembling, now.
The UN did request an advisory ruling from the ICJ on the apartheid wall and in 2004 the court advised that the wall was "illegal". How did that work out for the Palestinians?
those advisory rulings are meaningless gibberish; the people requesting them just hand them one sided arguments with no objective evidence, and then ask the judges how they would rule on the basis of the slanted premises, that's all; they don't ask for rebuttals or contrary arguments, and they aren't real cases, so your premise is just as ridiculous as your first one. IF the faux 'palestinians' thought they had a real case, they would file a real court case. It's just that simple. They know they don't have one, and they know they themselves haven't complied with the vast majority of Resolutions in the past, nor do they intend to in the future. they've violated every single one of them, from water treaties to Oslo and beyond.
Palestinians have no recourse with the ICJ, they are not a member state.
lol but you think the Wall 'ruling' was valid ... you're obviously contradicting yourself here.
Keep changing that story!. It only makes you look more dishonest and ridiculous. The Posting Last!! game isn't going to help you any.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Replies
- 40
- Views
- 453
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 387
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 371
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 168
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 119
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-