What's Wrong With Education Starts At the Top And Trickles Down

[Annie]

Links and more at site:

http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2005/05/only_the_red_kn.php

Brooklyn College, one of our nation's most esteemed public institutions of higher learning. Of course, I wasn't referring to "red" as in red state, but "red" in the way we used to mean it - and even that is obviously an exaggeration. What we are dealing with at Brooklyn - and so many other colleges and universities today - is an ideological hardening of the arteries so rigid it threatens the ability to think. This naturally creates a "trickle down" into our high schools and junior highs, only made worse by the National Association for Teacher Accreditation. Here's history professor K. C. Johnson on how this works:

The program at my own institution, Brooklyn College, exemplifies how application of NCATE's new approach can easily be used to screen out potential public school teachers who hold undesirable political beliefs. Brooklyn's education faculty, which assumes as fact that "an education centered on social justice prepares the highest quality of future teachers," recently launched a pilot initiative to assess all education students on whether they are "knowledgeable about, sensitive to and responsive to issues of diversity and social justice as these influence curriculum and pedagogy, school culture, relationships with colleagues and members of the school community, and candidates' analysis of student work and behavior."

At the undergraduate level, these high-sounding principles have been translated into practice through a required class called "Language and Literacy Development in Secondary Education." According to numerous students, the course's instructor demanded that they recognize "white English" as the "oppressors' language." Without explanation, the class spent its session before Election Day screening Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. When several students complained to the professor about the course's politicized content, they were informed that their previous education had left them "brainwashed" on matters relating to race and social justice.

Troubled by this response, at least five students filed written complaints with the department chair last December. They received no formal reply, but soon discovered that their coming forward had negative consequences. One senior was told to leave Brooklyn and take an equivalent course at a community college. Two other students were accused of violating the college's "academic integrity" policy and refused permission to bring a witness, a tape recorder, or an attorney to a meeting with the dean of undergraduate studies to discuss the allegation. Despite the unseemly nature of retaliating against student whistleblowers, Brooklyn's overall manner of assessing commitment to "social justice" conforms to NCATE's recommendations, previewing what we can expect as other education programs more aggressively scrutinize their students' "dispositions" on the matter.

Must prospective public school teachers accept a professor's argument that "white English" is the "oppressors' language" in order to enter the profession? In our ideologically imbalanced academic climate, the combination of dispositions theory and the new NCATE guidelines risk producing a new generation of educators certified not because they mastered their subject but because they expressed fealty to the professoriate's conception of "social justice."....

 

[Annie]

Links and more at site:

http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2005/05/only_the_red_kn.php

Whoops, realized some of you might be even more interested in this part:

There's more on what's going at Brooklyn College from the NY Sun:

The sociology department at Brooklyn College earlier this month elected as its chairman one Timothy Shortell. That means that Professor Shortell will have an advisory role, and thus a bully pulpit, to pronounce on every candidate up for tenure at the college, which is part of the City University of New York.

Readers of these columns may recall that Mr. Shortell was in the news back in 2003 for having written and published an article asserting that "those who are religious are incapable of moral action" and describing the faithful as "moral retards." Wrote Mr. Shortell, "Can there be any doubt that humanity would be better off without religion? Everyone who appreciates the good, the true and the beautiful has a duty to challenge this social poison at every opportunity. It is not enough to be irreligious; we must use our critique to expose religion for what it is: sanctimonious nonsense."...

 

[onedomino]

Check out Timothy Shortell's own web page to view the magnitude of his leftist extremism. Whoever hired him as the head of the Brooklyn College Sociology Department should be fired. http://www.shortell.org/

 

[insein]

i think the new troll yeulla is a product of this very phenomenon.

 

[Annie]

Whoops, realized some of you might be even more interested in this part:

Same professor as "religious are retarded..." Again it seems some points are being made at the liberal swing in MSM and even now universities....

http://www.nysun.com/article/15053

Professor Who Belittled Believers Drops Bid To Head Up a Department

BY JACOB GERSHMAN - Staff Reporter of the Sun
June 8, 2005


A Brooklyn College professor who described religious people as "moral retards" said he is dropping his bid to become chairman of the department of sociology after the college's president expressed outrage over his views.

Timothy Shortell, an associate professor in the sociology department at the CUNY senior college, sent a bitter e-mail on Monday to several departmental heads saying he had decided to step down as chairman-elect and claiming he was a victim of a political attack.

Yesterday, the college's administration, led by the president, Christoph Kimmich, announced that Mr. Shortell declined the appointment but would be consulting on the future leadership of the department.

In his e-mail, Mr. Shortell expressed anger at the treatment he received from some members of his department and at what he called the administration's "inadequate" defense of his academic freedom....