- Thread starter
- #21
The problem is that people who question or present evidence contrary to official explanations or official conspiracy theories are given the label "conspiracy theorist". A term that has somehow managed to simultaneously suggest the person is a lunatic.
Not all people who question the accuracy of events are the same.
For instance, I am convinced that the United States has been to the moon, taken samples from the moon, etc.
However, I am also convinced the official explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 is complete and utter BS. It was brought down by controlled demolition, plain and simple.
And now I await the inevitable onslaught of insults
I won't get into this debate on this thread because I've spent the last several months debating this on another thread. All I will say is that there is NO proof it was brought down by demolition...even thermite. There's a thread called "Twoofer Strategy" you can look at that will show this debate in depth. I will agree that the official story is not likely completely truthful; which is expected whent the government is dealing with things, however, I do not believe the government is responsible or even let it happen.
Well, at least your not as closed minded as some other posters on here.
Yes, we will simply agree to disagree, no need to bring the debate on this thread
Thank you.