What's the Libertarian view on ?

[Michelle420]

All humans no matter what race or gender should have a right to decline an employment offer. Their reasons behind it do not take away someone else's liberty.

Whereas , in a consumer buying situation if a seller refuses to sell a product to certain humans (based on race or gender) they have taken away that humans freedom to participate in a purchase equal to other humans.

But what is the substantive difference between the two? What is the fundamental difference between offering your services to one person or more than one?

Opportunity to to participate in an economical freedom

In one instance a person is denied the liberty to make a purchase that other humans are given.

 

[dblack]

All humans no matter what race or gender should have a right to decline an employment offer. Their reasons behind it do not take away someone else's liberty.

Whereas , in a consumer buying situation if a seller refuses to sell a product to certain humans (based on race or gender) they have taken away that humans freedom to participate in a purchase equal to other humans.

But what is the substantive difference between the two? What is the fundamental difference between offering your services to one person or more than one?

Opportunity to to participate in an economical freedom

In one instance a person is denied the liberty to make a purchase that other humans are given.

I'm not seeing the difference. This notion that an individual has a "right" to the services of another doesn't make sense to me.

In any case, I appreciate that you're looking for understanding, not argument. To that end, know that what libertarians find reprehensible about laws banning discrimination is that they are a departure from the liberal ideal of egalitarian, equal protection of the law. They are an inversion of the principle of universal rights, instead creating protected classes of people who enjoy special rights depending on what or who they are.

Essentially, discrimination laws create thought crime. They tell us who we must associate with, and deny us the right to refuse such association unless we have a good excuse (according to prevailing consensus on what that might be).

 

[Paulie]

animal cruelty, burn , torture or maim an animal

child porn, any sexual or physical violent acts on a child

religious freedom olygamy, prayer over medicine, drugs as part of a religious enlightenment ritual

segregation

discrimination

Do libertarians believe it should all be legal?

Are there any social boundaries that Libertarians advocate if so what are they?

Are you serious? You don't know shit about libertarianism.

My freedom ends where someone else's begins.

We don't think it's ok to rape children you fucking retard.