froggy
Gold Member
- Aug 18, 2009
- 12,490
- 2,655
- 245
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Two other federal court judges -- in Virginia and Michigan -- have recently upheld the health insurance mandate."
2014 is a long time away, politically speaking.
Take every level possible to fight this in the courts... and if the goddamn SC does not strike this bullshit down, work every harder to have conservative control of all of congress and defund the piece of shit... if not ensuring veto override power to get rid of it entirely
It happens that the judge is conservative and should have reclused himself.
Let the ruling ride and see how many run to Obamacare.
Wow... a dailyshow comedy link and a pic as your support... typical... you little asshole troll...
Go back and finish living up to your oedipal fantasies
He owns part of a right wing think tank and is a partisan activist judge.
The right likes those kinds of judges.
Wow... a dailyshow comedy link and a pic as your support... typical... you little asshole troll...
Go back and finish living up to your oedipal fantasies
eventually it will go to the Supreme court. And there it will split between those that understand the meaning behind freedom and those that support government enslavement.
"In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court rules corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money to elect and defeat candidates. One lawmaker describes it as the worst Supreme Court decision since the Dred Scott case justifying slaveryhttp://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/22/in_landmark_campaign_finance_ruling_supreme."
eventually it will go to the Supreme court. And there it will split between those that understand the meaning behind freedom and those that support government enslavement.Yeah.....that's who we need to rely-on......
....the same clowns who opened-up our last-election to WORLD-WIDE participation!!
"In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court rules corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money to elect and defeat candidates. One lawmaker describes it as the worst Supreme Court decision since the Dred Scott case justifying slaveryhttp://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/22/in_landmark_campaign_finance_ruling_supreme."
He owns part of a right wing think tank and is a partisan activist judge.
The right likes those kinds of judges.
Either the constitution grants the fed the authority to make people purchase things, or it doesn't. That should be fairly easy to find. The fact that no such authority exists is fairly cut and dried. I don't really see how this is a partisan issue.