Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
it goes back to many on the left being emotional, not logical.This is asbsolutely mindboggling. How did an entire section of the population not understand how the law and presumption of innocence works?There you have it folks, straight from Ariel Dumass' filthy mouth.
These braindead libtardos have nothing productive to offer our country. They could care less about fairness, they will destroy you if it promotes their extreme left views. If you're a white male Christian conservative you are automatically guilty of something. And they'll make something up if they can't find something to charge you with.
"The writer of this vile tweet is a writer on the Stephen Colbert show, and has nearly 40,000 followers on Twitter. As the Senate confirmation vote was gearing up, she wanted everyone to know that "whatever happens" she is "just" glad she ruined a man's life. Never mind if he was innocent, never mind any of the facts or corroborations or shifting stories of his accuser. The important thing to her was ruining his life. That was what mattered."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ning_kavanaugh_gives_the_lefts_game_away.html
I usually do not ascribe to painting a large segment of the population with a broad brush but there is no other answer than to finally admit that liberals do not care about truth nor fairness, just proving they are mindless sheep being told what to say regardless of negating facts.
democrats, you deserve every criticism you get. What a sad state of affairs.
Of course that doesn't mention that perhaps many of them were acting like this for payments.it goes back to many on the left being emotional, not logical.This is asbsolutely mindboggling. How did an entire section of the population not understand how the law and presumption of innocence works?There you have it folks, straight from Ariel Dumass' filthy mouth.
These braindead libtardos have nothing productive to offer our country. They could care less about fairness, they will destroy you if it promotes their extreme left views. If you're a white male Christian conservative you are automatically guilty of something. And they'll make something up if they can't find something to charge you with.
"The writer of this vile tweet is a writer on the Stephen Colbert show, and has nearly 40,000 followers on Twitter. As the Senate confirmation vote was gearing up, she wanted everyone to know that "whatever happens" she is "just" glad she ruined a man's life. Never mind if he was innocent, never mind any of the facts or corroborations or shifting stories of his accuser. The important thing to her was ruining his life. That was what mattered."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ning_kavanaugh_gives_the_lefts_game_away.html
I usually do not ascribe to painting a large segment of the population with a broad brush but there is no other answer than to finally admit that liberals do not care about truth nor fairness, just proving they are mindless sheep being told what to say regardless of negating facts.
democrats, you deserve every criticism you get. What a sad state of affairs.
but i'd bet just about anything if you accused them of something w/o proof, they'd want our system in place to keep it from being what they did to kavanaugh.
There you have it folks, straight from Ariel Dumass' filthy mouth.
These braindead libtardos have nothing productive to offer our country. They could care less about fairness, they will destroy you if it promotes their extreme left views. If you're a white male Christian conservative you are automatically guilty of something. And they'll make something up if they can't find something to charge you with.
"The writer of this vile tweet is a writer on the Stephen Colbert show, and has nearly 40,000 followers on Twitter. As the Senate confirmation vote was gearing up, she wanted everyone to know that "whatever happens" she is "just" glad she ruined a man's life. Never mind if he was innocent, never mind any of the facts or corroborations or shifting stories of his accuser. The important thing to her was ruining his life. That was what mattered."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ning_kavanaugh_gives_the_lefts_game_away.html
Wow, you're talking about FAIRNESS.
A US president who was elected with less votes than the other candidate is putting in a Supreme Court justice, and you're talking about FAIR?
Only 12 states get to decide the president, that's 20% of the people who vote. Which is about 11% of the people.
There you have it folks, straight from Ariel Dumass' filthy mouth.
These braindead libtardos have nothing productive to offer our country. They could care less about fairness, they will destroy you if it promotes their extreme left views. If you're a white male Christian conservative you are automatically guilty of something. And they'll make something up if they can't find something to charge you with.
"The writer of this vile tweet is a writer on the Stephen Colbert show, and has nearly 40,000 followers on Twitter. As the Senate confirmation vote was gearing up, she wanted everyone to know that "whatever happens" she is "just" glad she ruined a man's life. Never mind if he was innocent, never mind any of the facts or corroborations or shifting stories of his accuser. The important thing to her was ruining his life. That was what mattered."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ning_kavanaugh_gives_the_lefts_game_away.html
Wow, you're talking about FAIRNESS.
A US president who was elected with less votes than the other candidate is putting in a Supreme Court justice, and you're talking about FAIR?
Only 12 states get to decide the president, that's 20% of the people who vote. Which is about 11% of the people.
We're talking about a legally elected president who won in a landslide.
Landslide it wasn't. Legally elected through a shit electoral system yes. But as I said, only 12 states get to decide who the president is.
Fair? No, it's not. I do notice you didn't actually talk about the points I had brought up.
All 50 decide. Nothing wrong with our electoral system.
Oh please.
Have you seen advertising spending? They target 12 states, because only 12 states can actually decide which person is to be president, because the other 38 states make no difference. Doesn't matter who you vote for in California, the Democrats win.
There is a LOT wrong with the electoral system.
The fact that only two parties control the whole system, and they're as corrupt and partisan as hell and incapable of running the country is evidence of that.
Wow, you're talking about FAIRNESS.
A US president who was elected with less votes than the other candidate is putting in a Supreme Court justice, and you're talking about FAIR?
Only 12 states get to decide the president, that's 20% of the people who vote. Which is about 11% of the people.
We're talking about a legally elected president who won in a landslide.
Landslide it wasn't. Legally elected through a shit electoral system yes. But as I said, only 12 states get to decide who the president is.
Fair? No, it's not. I do notice you didn't actually talk about the points I had brought up.
All 50 decide. Nothing wrong with our electoral system.
Oh please.
Have you seen advertising spending? They target 12 states, because only 12 states can actually decide which person is to be president, because the other 38 states make no difference. Doesn't matter who you vote for in California, the Democrats win.
There is a LOT wrong with the electoral system.
The fact that only two parties control the whole system, and they're as corrupt and partisan as hell and incapable of running the country is evidence of that.
I don't disagree with them being corrupt.
We're talking about a legally elected president who won in a landslide.
Landslide it wasn't. Legally elected through a shit electoral system yes. But as I said, only 12 states get to decide who the president is.
Fair? No, it's not. I do notice you didn't actually talk about the points I had brought up.
All 50 decide. Nothing wrong with our electoral system.
Oh please.
Have you seen advertising spending? They target 12 states, because only 12 states can actually decide which person is to be president, because the other 38 states make no difference. Doesn't matter who you vote for in California, the Democrats win.
There is a LOT wrong with the electoral system.
The fact that only two parties control the whole system, and they're as corrupt and partisan as hell and incapable of running the country is evidence of that.
I don't disagree with them being corrupt.
Okay, and?
There you have it folks, straight from Ariel Dumass' filthy mouth.
These braindead libtardos have nothing productive to offer our country. They could care less about fairness, they will destroy you if it promotes their extreme left views. If you're a white male Christian conservative you are automatically guilty of something. And they'll make something up if they can't find something to charge you with.
"The writer of this vile tweet is a writer on the Stephen Colbert show, and has nearly 40,000 followers on Twitter. As the Senate confirmation vote was gearing up, she wanted everyone to know that "whatever happens" she is "just" glad she ruined a man's life. Never mind if he was innocent, never mind any of the facts or corroborations or shifting stories of his accuser. The important thing to her was ruining his life. That was what mattered."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ning_kavanaugh_gives_the_lefts_game_away.html
Wow, you're talking about FAIRNESS.
A US president who was elected with less votes than the other candidate is putting in a Supreme Court justice, and you're talking about FAIR?
Only 12 states get to decide the president, that's 20% of the people who vote. Which is about 11% of the people.
Landslide it wasn't. Legally elected through a shit electoral system yes. But as I said, only 12 states get to decide who the president is.
Fair? No, it's not. I do notice you didn't actually talk about the points I had brought up.
All 50 decide. Nothing wrong with our electoral system.
Oh please.
Have you seen advertising spending? They target 12 states, because only 12 states can actually decide which person is to be president, because the other 38 states make no difference. Doesn't matter who you vote for in California, the Democrats win.
There is a LOT wrong with the electoral system.
The fact that only two parties control the whole system, and they're as corrupt and partisan as hell and incapable of running the country is evidence of that.
I don't disagree with them being corrupt.
Okay, and?
How do you propose to destroy the two corrupt parties?
