What will it take to make the liberals happy in our country?

[JRK]

If we were ever lucky enough to outsource our liberals to a place where the average income was $100 a year they'd take to the streets to protest someone making 102

They are terminally unhappy

ask every lib you know what would it take for them to be happy
They do not know
There still getting "even" from 2000 I guess

It is nuts and there being lied too and hurt allot worse than I am
Makes no sense

 

[BallsBrunswick]

Seriously?
There is nothing wrong with the grammar in this thread
you ignoring a simple question only hi lights how out of touch the liberal is in this country to how serious these problems are

It's one of the worst composed OPs I have ever seen and we are supposed to decode that mess into a question? Good grammar and punctuation are the visible signs of an organized mind with coherent thought processes. I could write you a lengthy answer full of policy goals and hope for a bright future but frankly, I am pretty sure you do not want a serious answer to your question.

Look if you feel so strong about my grammar do us both a favor
ignore me
Liberals do not have the guts to enter into an honest debate, this is a classic response
ignore the question
attack the messenger

How is this a debate? You're attacking a fictitious group of people and then getting upset when people tell you you're stupid.

 

[occupied]

Seriously?
There is nothing wrong with the grammar in this thread
you ignoring a simple question only hi lights how out of touch the liberal is in this country to how serious these problems are

It's one of the worst composed OPs I have ever seen and we are supposed to decode that mess into a question? Good grammar and punctuation are the visible signs of an organized mind with coherent thought processes. I could write you a lengthy answer full of policy goals and hope for a bright future but frankly, I am pretty sure you do not want a serious answer to your question.

Look if you feel so strong about my grammar do us both a favor
ignore me
Liberals do not have the guts to enter into an honest debate, this is a classic response
ignore the question
attack the messenger

An honest debate always starts with a somewhat neutral question, not an insultingly loaded question. You cannot blame everything on liberals, call them Marxists and worse and have any right to expect anything less than abuse and harsh criticism. On a related note, when did you stop beating your wife?

 

[WillowTree]

close to 60 years we had 5% UE
we had small deficits
We passed laws to make sure we treated every-one equal but the white male

That was not good enough
sense 2007 when the Marxist/liberal agenda took over our country we now have
little hope for jobs
HUGE deficits
and a class warfare in this country that I thought I would never see
We have Ins mandates
we have people who never tell the truth in charge

Are you happy yet Libs?
what else do you want?

I mean this Sandy hook tragedy is a perfect example
lets not discuss the problem, hell lets blame it on a piece of steel and demand we take another liberty away from you neighbor
That will fix it

Just like the stimulus did
and the last 50% of tarp
and going 4 years without a budget
Blame all of it on W and the rich, that will fix all of it

What will take to make you people happy?

Give them "free" everything.

 

[francoHFW]

"2007 the marxist agenda took over", despite Bush vetoeing everything to the point that Dems just gave up and waited for 2008? And thanks for the depression Pub cronyism and corruption started, period. Everyone but brainwashed ignorami know that. Pub dupes!!

OP? O-care, stop obstructing the recovery, taxes on the rich, and a living wage after the recovery next year ($11 is 1968'smin wage- thanks for ruining THAT)...

 

[daveman]

Conservatives happy in our country; they are truly a miserable group of people.

Ain't that the truth, of course only our deaths would make them happy, for a little while.

Well, aren't you just a little martyr-wannabe.

The flaw in your fantasy is that you're not important enough to wish jock itch on, much less death.

Hey, Victim Boi! Did I burst your widdle bubble?

 

[rdean]

These threads are always so strange to me. They ignore what Republicans did under Bush through reconciliation. They get both their economic policies, cut taxes on the wealthy and deregulate, from the Heritage Foundation. They believe "supply and demand" is a "wild liberal theory". They don't know anything and are proud of it. They want no smart people in their party. They are anti education and yet, are loaded with confidence - in spite of many years of failure. Very strange.

 

[konradv]

Ain't that the truth, of course only our deaths would make them happy, for a little while.

Well, aren't you just a little martyr-wannabe.

The flaw in your fantasy is that you're not important enough to wish jock itch on, much less death.

Hey, Victim Boi! Did I burst your widdle bubble?

NO, yours was. 11/6/12, I believe.

 

[daveman]

Well, aren't you just a little martyr-wannabe.

The flaw in your fantasy is that you're not important enough to wish jock itch on, much less death.

Hey, Victim Boi! Did I burst your widdle bubble?

NO, yours was. 11/6/12, I believe.

Holy non-sequitur, Batman!

So, then, you agree that occupado is important enough to be on someone's target list?

Really?

 

[konradv]

Hey, Victim Boi! Did I burst your widdle bubble?

NO, yours was. 11/6/12, I believe.

Holy non-sequitur, Batman!

So, then, you agree that occupado is important enough to be on someone's target list?

Really?

What does that have to do with your bubble being burst on 11/6/12? You pointed out his. I pointed out yours. Don't get your panties in a bunch..., AGAIN!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It's one of the worst composed OPs I have ever seen and we are supposed to decode that mess into a question? Good grammar and punctuation are the visible signs of an organized mind with coherent thought processes. I could write you a lengthy answer full of policy goals and hope for a bright future but frankly, I am pretty sure you do not want a serious answer to your question.

Look if you feel so strong about my grammar do us both a favor
ignore me
Liberals do not have the guts to enter into an honest debate, this is a classic response
ignore the question
attack the messenger

An honest debate always starts with a somewhat neutral question, not an insultingly loaded question. You cannot blame everything on liberals, call them Marxists and worse and have any right to expect anything less than abuse and harsh criticism. On a related note, when did you stop beating your wife?

True.

It’s also impossible to have an ‘honest debate’ with someone whose mind is clearly completely closed.

 

[occupied]

Look if you feel so strong about my grammar do us both a favor
ignore me
Liberals do not have the guts to enter into an honest debate, this is a classic response
ignore the question
attack the messenger

An honest debate always starts with a somewhat neutral question, not an insultingly loaded question. You cannot blame everything on liberals, call them Marxists and worse and have any right to expect anything less than abuse and harsh criticism. On a related note, when did you stop beating your wife?

True.

It’s also impossible to have an ‘honest debate’ with someone whose mind is clearly completely closed.

Yes but on the other hand my infrequent threads usually sink because I start them with a neutral tone, there is a fine line between being provocative and being insultingly confrontational.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

An honest debate always starts with a somewhat neutral question, not an insultingly loaded question. You cannot blame everything on liberals, call them Marxists and worse and have any right to expect anything less than abuse and harsh criticism. On a related note, when did you stop beating your wife?

True.

It’s also impossible to have an ‘honest debate’ with someone whose mind is clearly completely closed.

Yes but on the other hand my infrequent threads usually sink because I start them with a neutral tone, there is a fine line between being provocative and being insultingly confrontational.

Many on the right seem capable only of the latter.

 

[LoneLaugher]

We could have an honest discussion about what would make liberals and nutters happy....but the nutters would never do it. They would come off looking like assholes and they know it.

 

[daveman]

NO, yours was. 11/6/12, I believe.

Holy non-sequitur, Batman!

So, then, you agree that occupado is important enough to be on someone's target list?

Really?

What does that have to do with your bubble being burst on 11/6/12? You pointed out his. I pointed out yours. Don't get your panties in a bunch..., AGAIN!

Like I said: Holy non-sequitur, Batman!

 

[SniperFire]

To a Liberal, life is a shit sammich, and everyday is just another big ol' bite.

 

[JRK]

Look if you feel so strong about my grammar do us both a favor
ignore me
Liberals do not have the guts to enter into an honest debate, this is a classic response
ignore the question
attack the messenger

An honest debate always starts with a somewhat neutral question, not an insultingly loaded question. You cannot blame everything on liberals, call them Marxists and worse and have any right to expect anything less than abuse and harsh criticism. On a related note, when did you stop beating your wife?

True.

It’s also impossible to have an ‘honest debate’ with someone whose mind is clearly completely closed.

An honest debate?
What will the addition of more gun laws do to prevent another event such as this?
simple question

 

[Billo_Really]

An attempt at decent grammar and punctuation would be a good start.

And a little understanding of the meaning of the terms they use, would help as well. If you're going to accuse someone of being a marxist or a socialist, it would help if they knew just what marxism or socialism is.

As an example, if Obama really was a socialist, there wouldn't be an "Afordable Care Bill", to provide healthcare to those who don't have medical insurance; there would be no $2 trillion per year healthcare industry at all. It would be completely government subsidized. That's socialism!

Obama's not a socialist and liberals are not marxist. But it does seem there are a lot of extreme righties that are embracing fascism.

 

[occupied]

An attempt at decent grammar and punctuation would be a good start.

And a little understanding of the meaning of the terms they use, would help as well. If you're going to accuse someone of being a marxist or a socialist, it would help if they knew just what marxism or socialism is.

As an example, if Obama really was a socialist, there wouldn't be an "Afordable Care Bill", to provide healthcare to those who don't have medical insurance; there would be no $2 trillion per year healthcare industry at all. It would be completely government subsidized. That's socialism!

Obama's not a socialist and liberals are not marxist. But it does seem there are a lot of extreme righties that are embracing fascism.

They don't care if they are using these terms accurately, to them it is nothing but a scary label to slap on things they do not like. Those terms have always been a political weapon to the right, In their mind they are using them correctly, if not accurately.

 

[JRK]

An attempt at decent grammar and punctuation would be a good start.

And a little understanding of the meaning of the terms they use, would help as well. If you're going to accuse someone of being a marxist or a socialist, it would help if they knew just what marxism or socialism is.

As an example, if Obama really was a socialist, there wouldn't be an "Afordable Care Bill", to provide healthcare to those who don't have medical insurance; there would be no $2 trillion per year healthcare industry at all. It would be completely government subsidized. That's socialism!

Obama's not a socialist and liberals are not marxist. But it does seem there are a lot of extreme righties that are embracing fascism.

They don't care if they are using these terms accurately, to them it is nothing but a scary label to slap on things they do not like. Those terms have always been a political weapon to the right, In their mind they are using them correctly, if not accurately.

we are paying for much of Obamacare
also he and GWB dealt with GM in a true socialist fashion, GWB once, sense BHO has done many as well as many events with GM that were pure socialist in manner

Also his attack on those who make income is classic
Also his numerous Czars (all presidents have) but BHO had many-many more

Look I defended BHO with this until lately
He is a liar
He does and says what ever it takes to get his way
GWB saved GM (really the tax payer did)
He has created no private sector jobs
He created the massive debt we deal with today
He said the opposite to get elected
Also the water boarding got UBA as well as the seals
All BHO did was give it the go ahead (good for him)

That is why people call him, Pelosi, Reid this