What the voting laws should be.

Property qualification.
Do you own real property?
If not, do you have at least $25,000 in net worth?

That's the system this country was founded on and it worked pretty well. Pols expanded the franchise in order to get elected and we have the dysfunctional system we have now.

Just cut the BS and say it:

"Black and brown people should not be allowed to vote."

You;re a racist piece of shit. You think non white people dont own property or have no net worth?

LOL.

It is estimated that African Americans own less than 8 million acres total (non farm land) in the continental US, which is comprised of roughly 2.4 billion acres.

It's not racism, it's the facts. You don't want the poor and the blacks to vote.
 
Last edited:
Property qualification.
Do you own real property?
If not, do you have at least $25,000 in net worth?

That's the system this country was founded on and it worked pretty well. Pols expanded the franchise in order to get elected and we have the dysfunctional system we have now.

Just cut the BS and say it:

"Black and brown people should not be allowed to vote."

You;re a racist piece of shit. You think non white people dont own property or have no net worth?

Of course they do, all progressives think non-whites need the democrats to look after them.
 
Just cut the BS and say it:

"Black and brown people should not be allowed to vote."

You;re a racist piece of shit. You think non white people dont own property or have no net worth?

LOL.

It is estimated that African Americans own less than 8 million acres total (non farm land) in the continental US, which is comprised of roughly 2.4 billion acres.

It's not racism, it's the facts. You don't want the poor and the blacks to vote.

That's an irrelevant statistic. Can you tell my why it's irrelevant?
That I dont want the poor to vote is true. I dont want people with nothing to lose voting themselves free stuff from people with something to lose.
 
Just cut the BS and say it:

"Black and brown people should not be allowed to vote."

You;re a racist piece of shit. You think non white people dont own property or have no net worth?

Of course they do, all progressives think non-whites need the democrats to look after them.

Well. Good attempt at deflecting the facts.

It is estimated that African Americans only own what equates to 0.34% of all the available non farm real estate in the USA.

Considering that African Americans equate to roughly 13% of the US population.. How are they supposed to get a rightful voice for them in the system?

Same goes for the poor, 15.6% of the country is declared poor (of which only 27.4% is black, and 26.6% is hispanic), how are they supposed to get a rightful voice in the system?

The only method behind the thought process of land ownership and personal wealth based exceptions to voting is that you don't want certain demographics to vote.
 
You;re a racist piece of shit. You think non white people dont own property or have no net worth?

Of course they do, all progressives think non-whites need the democrats to look after them.

Well. Good attempt at deflecting the facts.

It is estimated that African Americans only own what equates to 0.34% of all the available non farm real estate in the USA.

Considering that African Americans equate to roughly 13% of the US population.. How are they supposed to get a rightful voice for them in the system?

Same goes for the poor, 15.6% of the country is declared poor (of which only 27.4% is black, and 26.6% is hispanic), how are they supposed to get a rightful voice in the system?

The only method behind the thought process of land ownership and personal wealth based exceptions to voting is that you don't want certain demographics to vote.

OK, you havent figured out why your argument is fallacious. That makes you incredibly stupid. But with a screen name like Liberal it was a foregone conclusion.
Black homeownership is nearly 50%. It would be if Obama hadn't fucked up the economy. How are poor people supposed to get "their rightful place" in the system (what is their rightful place? Dem lackeys?) How about going to school, getting a job, staying out of trouble and not getting pregnant?
 
The radical right here clearly show why they are out of the mainstream and no longer important players in the political process.
 
The fact that so many on the far right want to disenfranchise many Americans from voting means they are aware they, the far right, no longer control the elections.

Of course they want to limit the vote.
 
Let's see, since we've already disenfranchised the young, the poor, and the undereducated, let's cap the voting age at 50. Old people aren't the future, theyre the past and only the future should have the right to vote on how the future will be governed.

Why should people with wisdom and experience be prohibited from voting?
You aren't what they call a Deep Thinker, are you?
 
Let's see, since we've already disenfranchised the young, the poor, and the undereducated, let's cap the voting age at 50. Old people aren't the future, theyre the past and only the future should have the right to vote on how the future will be governed.

Why should people with wisdom and experience be prohibited from voting?
You aren't what they call a Deep Thinker, are you?

Why should people with outdated views of the world be allowed to have a voice in today's modern society.

Maybe we should add to Matthews test, a computer skills and world view portion. Anyone who can't use an iPad can't vote.
 
And you are an idiot.

Property qualification.
Do you own real property?
If not, do you have at least $25,000 in net worth?

That's the system this country was founded on and it worked pretty well. Pols expanded the franchise in order to get elected and we have the dysfunctional system we have now.
 
Oh did I forget to say that an IQ test should be required??? We want to make sure that there's a limit on the free shitters!

Yeah! There should be a literacy test and a poll tax, too!

.
 
As people are working well into their 80s, just limiting the vote to tax paying citizens should be sufficient. You retire, you lost your right to vote.
 
1. Are you over the age of 18 or will be 18 years of age on election day?
2. Are you a citizen of the United States of America?
3. Can you prove that you are a citizen of the United States of America?

If you answer no to any of the above 3 questions, you can not vote. If you answered yes to all 3 questions, you have only one vote and one vote only.

Pretty simple.

This process is achieved during voter registration. All that is required to secure our voting process from that point is for your government to properly maintain the voter registration rolls.

If they can't even manage to do that simple task, it would be pretty damned stupid to add yet another layer of incompetent government on top. Only an idiot would think it would be a better idea to give them even more tasks to do instead of getting them to correctly perform their existing tasks.


.
 
As people are working well into their 80s, just limiting the vote to tax paying citizens should be sufficient. You retire, you lost your right to vote.

You clearly are not from America. That's not how it is done here. Our country is all about universal suffrage.

.
 
Let's see, since we've already disenfranchised the young, the poor, and the undereducated, let's cap the voting age at 50. Old people aren't the future, theyre the past and only the future should have the right to vote on how the future will be governed.

Why should people with wisdom and experience be prohibited from voting?
You aren't what they call a Deep Thinker, are you?

Why should people with outdated views of the world be allowed to have a voice in today's modern society.

Maybe we should add to Matthews test, a computer skills and world view portion. Anyone who can't use an iPad can't vote.
So Bernie Sanders, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama have outdated views?
If that's your concern then why not just administer a viewpoint test. If you fail you can always go to re-education camp.
 
Why should people with wisdom and experience be prohibited from voting?
You aren't what they call a Deep Thinker, are you?

Why should people with outdated views of the world be allowed to have a voice in today's modern society.

Maybe we should add to Matthews test, a computer skills and world view portion. Anyone who can't use an iPad can't vote.
So Bernie Sanders, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama have outdated views?
If that's your concern then why not just administer a viewpoint test. If you fail you can always go to re-education camp.

I think eliminating their voice in our society is sufficient.
 
Why should people with outdated views of the world be allowed to have a voice in today's modern society.

Maybe we should add to Matthews test, a computer skills and world view portion. Anyone who can't use an iPad can't vote.
So Bernie Sanders, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama have outdated views?
If that's your concern then why not just administer a viewpoint test. If you fail you can always go to re-education camp.

I think eliminating their voice in our society is sufficient.

I'd certainly like to see liberal voices relegated to KKK status in our society. But that needs to happen by losing in the marketplace of ideas, not stalinistic tactics.
 

Forum List

Back
Top