What say you, liberals? 9/11 Terrorist detainees want to stay in Guantanamo Bay!

[barenakedislam]

And lawyers for the terrorists say they might use legal means to keep their clients in Guantanamo, rather than transfer them to the Obama administration's proposed new prison in Illinois.

Buried in a blog item by Newsweek's Michael Isikoff was this bombshell. But the final irony is that many of the detainees may not even want to be transferred to Thomson and could conceivably even raise their own legal roadblocks to allow them to stay at Gitmo.

Falkoff notes that many of his clients, while they clearly want to go home, are at least being held under Geneva Convention conditions in Guantánamo. At Thomson, he notes, the plans call for them to be thrown into the equivalent of a "supermax" security prison under near-lockdown conditions.

"As far as our clients are concerned, it's probably preferable for them to remain at Guantánamo," he says.

The strident left-wing critiques of the Guantanamo facility have all centered around the fact that detainees there are horribly mistreated and conditions unbearable. But when push comes to shove, it would seem concerns about Guantanamo are overblown, and the prisoners there know that being held under the Geneva conventions outside the U.S. is much preferable to a maximum security prison in the U.S. Guantanamo Prisoners: We want to stay in Guantanamo | Washington Examiner

 

[Lumpy 1]

And lawyers for the terrorists say they might use legal means to keep their clients in Guantanamo, rather than transfer them to the Obama administration's proposed new prison in Illinois.

Buried in a blog item by Newsweek's Michael Isikoff was this bombshell. But the final irony is that many of the detainees may not even want to be transferred to Thomson and could conceivably even raise their own legal roadblocks to allow them to stay at Gitmo.

Falkoff notes that many of his clients, while they clearly want to go home, are at least being held under Geneva Convention conditions in Guantánamo. At Thomson, he notes, the plans call for them to be thrown into the equivalent of a "supermax" security prison under near-lockdown conditions.

"As far as our clients are concerned, it's probably preferable for them to remain at Guantánamo," he says.

The strident left-wing critiques of the Guantanamo facility have all centered around the fact that detainees there are horribly mistreated and conditions unbearable. But when push comes to shove, it would seem concerns about Guantanamo are overblown, and the prisoners there know that being held under the Geneva conventions outside the U.S. is much preferable to a maximum security prison in the U.S. Guantanamo Prisoners: We want to stay in Guantanamo | Washington Examiner

Perhaps they could visit Washington D.C. and spend a week at the White House, cherry blossoms in the spring..

You know, to break the monotony.

Better yet, winter in Gitmo .. summer in Chicago...

 

[barenakedislam]

And lawyers for the terrorists say they might use legal means to keep their clients in Guantanamo, rather than transfer them to the Obama administration's proposed new prison in Illinois.

Buried in a blog item by Newsweek's Michael Isikoff was this bombshell. But the final irony is that many of the detainees may not even want to be transferred to Thomson and could conceivably even raise their own legal roadblocks to allow them to stay at Gitmo.

Falkoff notes that many of his clients, while they clearly want to go home, are at least being held under Geneva Convention conditions in Guantánamo. At Thomson, he notes, the plans call for them to be thrown into the equivalent of a "supermax" security prison under near-lockdown conditions.

"As far as our clients are concerned, it's probably preferable for them to remain at Guantánamo," he says.

The strident left-wing critiques of the Guantanamo facility have all centered around the fact that detainees there are horribly mistreated and conditions unbearable. But when push comes to shove, it would seem concerns about Guantanamo are overblown, and the prisoners there know that being held under the Geneva conventions outside the U.S. is much preferable to a maximum security prison in the U.S. Guantanamo Prisoners: We want to stay in Guantanamo | Washington Examiner

Perhaps they could visit Washington D.C. and spend a week at the White House, cherry blossoms in the spring..

You know, to break the monotony.

Better yet, winter in Gitmo .. summer in Chicago...

Only if they can have the same kind of accommodations in Chicago!

 

[gautama]

And lawyers for the terrorists say they might use legal means to keep their clients in Guantanamo, rather than transfer them to the Obama administration's proposed new prison in Illinois.

Buried in a blog item by Newsweek's Michael Isikoff was this bombshell. But the final irony is that many of the detainees may not even want to be transferred to Thomson and could conceivably even raise their own legal roadblocks to allow them to stay at Gitmo.

Falkoff notes that many of his clients, while they clearly want to go home, are at least being held under Geneva Convention conditions in Guantánamo. At Thomson, he notes, the plans call for them to be thrown into the equivalent of a "supermax" security prison under near-lockdown conditions.

"As far as our clients are concerned, it's probably preferable for them to remain at Guantánamo," he says.

The strident left-wing critiques of the Guantanamo facility have all centered around the fact that detainees there are horribly mistreated and conditions unbearable. But when push comes to shove, it would seem concerns about Guantanamo are overblown, and the prisoners there know that being held under the Geneva conventions outside the U.S. is much preferable to a maximum security prison in the U.S. Guantanamo Prisoners: We want to stay in Guantanamo | Washington Examiner

The ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE TERRORISTS PREFER GITMO TO THOMSON ?

Atty Gen Eric Holder, the CORRUPT Lap Dog of the ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE TERRORISTS may wish to start singing a different tune.

But then, it's not what the actual detainees at Gitmo want....it is what their Al Queda leadership in Yemen, or Afghanistan/Pakistan want that will determine if the CORRUPT Lap Dog of the AL QUEDA, Atty Gen Eric Holder decides to change his present tune.

So, the GITMO DRAMA is on hold...........(exeunt hautboys).

 

[barenakedislam]

The ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE TERRORISTS PREFER GITMO TO THOMSON ?

Atty Gen Eric Holder, the CORRUPT Lap Dog of the ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE TERRORISTS may wish to start singing a different tune.

But then, it's not what the actual detainees at Gitmo want....it is what their Al Queda leadership in Yemen, or Afghanistan/Pakistan want that will determine if the CORRUPT Lap Dog of the AL QUEDA, Atty Gen Eric Holder decides to change his present tune.

So, the GITMO DRAMA is on hold...........(exeunt hautboys).

Hmmm, makes me wonder if they didn't do this just to make Obama look like a fool? Dare I say the terrorists have a sense of humor?

 

[eots]

they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

 

[gautama]

they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

Ah yesssss.......EOTS, another Obamarrhoidal Idiot puking out his puke.

 

[eots]

they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

Ah yesssss.......EOTS, another Obamarrhoidal Idiot puking out his puke.

Obama is corrupt as the rest you ridiculous drone

 

[barenakedislam]

they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

Enemy combatants which they were legally declared are not entitled to due process, you fool.

Remember the Nazis that were captured on Long Island during WWII? They hadn't even done anything to anyone, but were on our shores. FDR gave them a military tribunal and they were shot dead within 3 weeks. Now THAT'S justice.

 

[eots]

Ohhh..I get it now..kinda like that whole Hitler Jew thingy



America totally kicks ass. Strongest nation on Earth. Nobody can kick our ass. Nobody can intimidate us, because we don't give a fuck. We are motherfucking hard like a gangsta with a nine by our side. Except there's no five-O gonna roll up and beat our xxx down. And we're not really criminals, because there's no international law. No international law, because there's no international courts. And there are no international courts because we refuse to recognize any court that might ever try to stop us from doing whatever the fuck we want.

No trials, no courts, no laws for America. So we can do whatever the xxxx we want. And we're not even criminals.

Doesn't that fuckin kick ass?

What an excellent country!


America Kicks Ass Lyrics - King Missile

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well, if you geniuses on the right have now decided that we should poll the detainees and let them decide where they go,

will you include the option of going free?

 

[gautama]

they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

Ah yesssss.......EOTS, another Obamarrhoidal Idiot puking out his puke.

Obama is corrupt as the rest you ridiculous drone

I can only go by what you puke out, FOOL.

If you mean well, but you are an inarticulate FOOL, then it's on YOU.

 

[asaratis]

Well, if you geniuses on the right have now decided that we should poll the detainees and let them decide where they go,

will you include the option of going free?

That's what Obama and Holder, LLC have set up for the New York Five...eventual freedom. Who says he's not fighting for freedom?

 

[eots]

Ah yesssss.......EOTS, another Obamarrhoidal Idiot puking out his puke.

Obama is corrupt as the rest you ridiculous drone

I can only go by what you puke out, FOOL.

If you mean well, but you are an inarticulate FOOL, then it's on YOU.

Originally Posted by eots
they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

lol..ya right Mr T..and I mention or Indicate my support for Obama in what part of this statement ?

 

[gautama]

Obama is corrupt as the rest you ridiculous drone

I can only go by what you puke out, FOOL.

If you mean well, but you are an inarticulate FOOL, then it's on YOU.

Originally Posted by eots
they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

lol..ya right Mr T..and I mention or Indicate my support for Obama in what part of this statement ?

Eots, I always thought you were a sort of 1/2 - wit. I was mistaken. You are a full blown Political Idiot which includes those who, getting a slice of the TRUTH, then run with a distorted version of it to the edge of the cliff.....then offa the cliff.

You do not have to actually state: I support the MARXIST POS Obami Salami on thisa or thata.

It is enough that you parrot his BULLSHIT practically word for word.

GEDDIT, you fucking IDIOT ?????

 

[gautama]

Well, if you geniuses on the right have now decided that we should poll the detainees and let them decide where they go,

will you include the option of going free?

Asaratis preempted the OBVIOUS answer.

NYCRAPEER, must you always behave like one of the most IDIOTIC OBAMARRHOIDS in this Forum.......ALL THE TIME ?!?!?!?

 

[Claudette]

they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

Enemy combatants which they were legally declared are not entitled to due process, you fool.

Remember the Nazis that were captured on Long Island during WWII? They hadn't even done anything to anyone, but were on our shores. FDR gave them a military tribunal and they were shot dead within 3 weeks. Now THAT'S justice.

I agree. If you want to beat these dirtbags then you have to get down and dirty in the sewer just lilke them. Get all the info you can get and then execute all of them. Thats the only language the Al Queda thugs understand. Trying to make nice just ain't gonna cut it with these bastards. We have to start playing for keeps.

 

[eots]

I can only go by what you puke out, FOOL.

If you mean well, but you are an inarticulate FOOL, then it's on YOU.

Originally Posted by eots
they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

lol..ya right Mr T..and I mention or Indicate my support for Obama in what part of this statement ?

Eots, I always thought you were a sort of 1/2 - wit. I was mistaken. You are a full blown Political Idiot which includes those who, getting a slice of the TRUTH, then run with a distorted version of it to the edge of the cliff.....then offa the cliff.

You do not have to actually state: I support the MARXIST POS Obami Salami on thisa or thata.

It is enough that you parrot his BULLSHIT practically word for word.

GEDDIT, you fucking IDIOT ?????

as the country marches toward a global socialist agenda through the policies of the both Bush and Obama administrations and the Wars of conquest continue and elevate regardless of who is selected President ..ya I am the parrot...right

 

[bodecea]

And lawyers for the terrorists say they might use legal means to keep their clients in Guantanamo, rather than transfer them to the Obama administration's proposed new prison in Illinois.

Buried in a blog item by Newsweek's Michael Isikoff was this bombshell. But the final irony is that many of the detainees may not even want to be transferred to Thomson and could conceivably even raise their own legal roadblocks to allow them to stay at Gitmo.

Falkoff notes that many of his clients, while they clearly want to go home, are at least being held under Geneva Convention conditions in Guantánamo. At Thomson, he notes, the plans call for them to be thrown into the equivalent of a "supermax" security prison under near-lockdown conditions.

"As far as our clients are concerned, it's probably preferable for them to remain at Guantánamo," he says.

The strident left-wing critiques of the Guantanamo facility have all centered around the fact that detainees there are horribly mistreated and conditions unbearable. But when push comes to shove, it would seem concerns about Guantanamo are overblown, and the prisoners there know that being held under the Geneva conventions outside the U.S. is much preferable to a maximum security prison in the U.S. Guantanamo Prisoners: We want to stay in Guantanamo | Washington Examiner

And how do YOU feel about that?

 

[bodecea]

they are not detainees they are prisoners held without due process

Enemy combatants which they were legally declared are not entitled to due process, you fool.

Remember the Nazis that were captured on Long Island during WWII? They hadn't even done anything to anyone, but were on our shores. FDR gave them a military tribunal and they were shot dead within 3 weeks. Now THAT'S justice.

I agree. If you want to beat these dirtbags then you have to get down and dirty in the sewer just lilke them. Get all the info you can get and then execute all of them. Thats the only language the Al Queda thugs understand. Trying to make nice just ain't gonna cut it with these bastards. We have to start playing for keeps.

Yes, the Hell with American morals and scruples. They're just words on a paper, aren't they?