- Thread starter
- #21
None of the above. The system of governance needs to be repaired.
It is what it is. Deal with it. What do you propose congress does?
Codifies it’s rules where (for one idea) it takes 75% of the other body (Senate has to change the House rules and vice versa).
So there is no more speaker/majority leader deciding what the rest of the body does.
If the House Passes a bill, the Senate has to take up the legislation in 90 days and vice versa. By “take up” the legislation…there has to be a floor vote by a quorum of the entire body.
For starters.
Make the rules effective starting on 1/1/XX when the next Congress is sworn in. Politics will always be there but when you codify the rules and make them unimpeachable, the politics take a backseat to the rules that govern the enterprise; not the other way around.
As for legislation; the only thing that matters is campaign reform. Top to bottom. Involving finance, redistricting, election logistics….
Meh. Not sure that would improve anything. Nothing would ever get done, plus it would take Constitutional amendments to effect those changes. Redistricting is a State function, so are election logistics to a degree. The USSC already ruled on campaign finance in the Citizens United decision.
"Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning campaign finance. ... The ruling effectively freed labor unions and corporations to spend money on electioneering communications and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates."