What Precendents/Rulings Would You Like The SC To Overturn?

[Biff_Poindexter]

Here's how conservatives on the Supreme Court plan to attack civil rights

With the new make up of the Supreme Court on the near horizon -- Trump has a chance to appoint a solid strict constitutionalist who will NOT be a swing vote for libs.

So what rulings or laws would you like to see overturned as being unconstitutional?

My biggest one is the sacred Civil Rights Act --- I believe it should be overturned or at least seriously gutted -- and I believe we may get to see that happen very soon if they can get rid of just this one provision “disparate impact” --- from the article:

The key here is that a practice doesn’t have to intentionally discriminate, but if the impact primarily falls on those belonging to a protected class, it warrants investigation. That has been the yardstick for measuring discrimination for over forty years now. One can imagine that if a plaintiff had to prove intent to discriminate, almost no provision in the civil rights laws would ever be enforced.

When you have these Black Activist-LGBT agitator types who wants to cry discrimination about everything -- when you force them to prove intent to discriminate, they will most definitely fail to do so -- therefore making the Civil Rights Act irrelevant. This will give companies and landowners the freedom to do as they wish with their property or business without having the fear of the government coming down on them.

If someone wants to discriminate based on race or religion, they should be free to do so if the person who feels they have been discriminated against can't prove their intent -- if you just happen to belong to a group that gets discriminated against the most, maybe that says more about you than the one who is discriminating against you.

There are more rulings that need to be or will be overturned, this is just one.

 

[mdk]

Kelo v. City of New London

 

[NightFox]

Marbury v. Madison

 

[Richard-H]

Here's how conservatives on the Supreme Court plan to attack civil rights

With the new make up of the Supreme Court on the near horizon -- Trump has a chance to appoint a solid strict constitutionalist who will NOT be a swing vote for libs.

So what rulings or laws would you like to see overturned as being unconstitutional?

My biggest one is the sacred Civil Rights Act --- I believe it should be overturned or at least seriously gutted -- and I believe we may get to see that happen very soon if they can get rid of just this one provision “disparate impact” --- from the article:

The key here is that a practice doesn’t have to intentionally discriminate, but if the impact primarily falls on those belonging to a protected class, it warrants investigation. That has been the yardstick for measuring discrimination for over forty years now. One can imagine that if a plaintiff had to prove intent to discriminate, almost no provision in the civil rights laws would ever be enforced.

When you have these Black Activist-LGBT agitator types who wants to cry discrimination about everything -- when you force them to prove intent to discriminate, they will most definitely fail to do so -- therefore making the Civil Rights Act irrelevant. This will give companies and landowners the freedom to do as they wish with their property or business without having the fear of the government coming down on them.

If someone wants to discriminate based on race or religion, they should be free to do so if the person who feels they have been discriminated against can't prove their intent -- if you just happen to belong to a group that gets discriminated against the most, maybe that says more about you than the one who is discriminating against you.

There are more rulings that need to be or will be overturned, this is just one.

So what your saying is that intent is what is important, not effect.

That would rule out all forms of negligence in all court cases. It's O.K. to burn down someone's house if you didn't MEAN to burn it down. - or at least if they can't PROVE that you meant to burn it down.

 

[Defiant1]

Rule public access laws on private businesses unconstitutional.
Public access laws should only apply to government entities.

 

[saltydancin]

Rule public access laws on private businesses unconstitutional.
Public access laws should only apply to government entities.

Seems precedent sentence structure of the supreme swastika up Uranus court lynching enforcement for the assassination of JFK after baptizing thine eyes by urination & another Rehnquist immaculate drug conception for some fabricated misnomer attempted assault on SCOTUS Kennedy to protect & serve Arab terrorists that threatened POTUS & to nuke Temple Mount prior to 9/11 must be language "serve the Pope or die" & "death to the infidels" Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities find too native...….

 

[IsaacNewton]

The new court will do it's best to overturn as many things in the Constitution as it can.

Trump with the gleeful idiots behind him is appointing the worst activist judges there are. The right wants these people to NEVER vote against them. Ever. They view the Constitution as a wall to be ignored.

 

[saltydancin]

The new court will do it's best to overturn as many things in the Constitution as it can.

Trump with the gleeful idiots behind him is appointing the worst activist judges there are. The right wants these people to NEVER vote against them. Ever. They view the Constitution as a wall to be ignored.

Why would they even waste the time to overturn things in the Constitution as the gleeful Islamidiotocracy have already judged thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists to be nothing more than federal sin Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The new court will do it's best to overturn as many things in the Constitution as it can.

Trump with the gleeful idiots behind him is appointing the worst activist judges there are. The right wants these people to NEVER vote against them. Ever. They view the Constitution as a wall to be ignored.

Why would they even waste the time to overturn things in the Constitution as the gleeful Islamidiotocracy have already judged thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists to be nothing more than federal sin Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities.

Try English next time. No one knows wtf you are saying.

 

[saltydancin]

The new court will do it's best to overturn as many things in the Constitution as it can.

Trump with the gleeful idiots behind him is appointing the worst activist judges there are. The right wants these people to NEVER vote against them. Ever. They view the Constitution as a wall to be ignored.

Why would they even waste the time to overturn things in the Constitution as the gleeful Islamidiotocracy have already judged thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists to be nothing more than federal sin Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities.

Try English next time. No one knows wtf you are saying.

Yet another schizophrenic dual citizen of US Christian-Vatican City Islam-Mecca super ego with Cannon-Sharia law lynching enforcement for the supreme swastika up Uranus court where US Constitutions are of no value in their megalomaniacal business of one nation under God..

 

[Sunsettommy]

Here's how conservatives on the Supreme Court plan to attack civil rights

With the new make up of the Supreme Court on the near horizon -- Trump has a chance to appoint a solid strict constitutionalist who will NOT be a swing vote for libs.

So what rulings or laws would you like to see overturned as being unconstitutional?

My biggest one is the sacred Civil Rights Act --- I believe it should be overturned or at least seriously gutted -- and I believe we may get to see that happen very soon if they can get rid of just this one provision “disparate impact” --- from the article:

The key here is that a practice doesn’t have to intentionally discriminate, but if the impact primarily falls on those belonging to a protected class, it warrants investigation. That has been the yardstick for measuring discrimination for over forty years now. One can imagine that if a plaintiff had to prove intent to discriminate, almost no provision in the civil rights laws would ever be enforced.

When you have these Black Activist-LGBT agitator types who wants to cry discrimination about everything -- when you force them to prove intent to discriminate, they will most definitely fail to do so -- therefore making the Civil Rights Act irrelevant. This will give companies and landowners the freedom to do as they wish with their property or business without having the fear of the government coming down on them.

If someone wants to discriminate based on race or religion, they should be free to do so if the person who feels they have been discriminated against can't prove their intent -- if you just happen to belong to a group that gets discriminated against the most, maybe that says more about you than the one who is discriminating against you.

There are more rulings that need to be or will be overturned, this is just one.

It seems that the Civil Rights Act destroyed the power of institutionalized racism in the deep south, but did little beyond what was already given to them from the 1860's to the 1870's when they were granted citizenship, vote and freedom.

Since it was the democrats who tried for 100 years after they lost the Civil war, to limit blacks with their segregationist games (Which are violations of the 13-15th amendments), making it hard to vote and denying them full freedom, it is no surprising why they quickly fell apart in the 1960's when the Civil rights acts took away their divisive games.

Now that it has worked as intended, it is out of date in a nation that is supposed to run on the creed of EQUITABLE rights for all, no matter the color or sex of the person. The amendments are now in place to support the rights of blacks and women.

 

[saltydancin]

The new court will do it's best to overturn as many things in the Constitution as it can.

Trump with the gleeful idiots behind him is appointing the worst activist judges there are. The right wants these people to NEVER vote against them. Ever. They view the Constitution as a wall to be ignored.

Why would they even waste the time to overturn things in the Constitution as the gleeful Islamidiotocracy have already judged thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists to be nothing more than federal sin Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities.

Try English next time. No one knows wtf you are saying.

The gravity of your master race master plan being exposed must be new to a totalitarian of the Islamidiotocracy where SCOTUS deems immaculate drug conceptions as the law of the land; whether it be to protect & serve thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists or Arab terrorists which in all probability were training for 9/11.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Rule public access laws on private businesses unconstitutional.
Public access laws should only apply to government entities.

Seems precedent sentence structure of the supreme swastika up Uranus court lynching enforcement for the assassination of JFK after baptizing thine eyes by urination & another Rehnquist immaculate drug conception for some fabricated misnomer attempted assault on SCOTUS Kennedy to protect & serve Arab terrorists that threatened POTUS & to nuke Temple Mount prior to 9/11 must be language "serve the Pope or die" & "death to the infidels" Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities find too native...….

Little early for that much crack, doncha think?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The new court will do it's best to overturn as many things in the Constitution as it can.

Trump with the gleeful idiots behind him is appointing the worst activist judges there are. The right wants these people to NEVER vote against them. Ever. They view the Constitution as a wall to be ignored.

DERP

What in the Constitution do you think they will overturn, Comrade shitferbrains? Roe v. Wade? cuz dat iz TWOOOO in da constafanution....

Fucking retard.

 

[saltydancin]

Rule public access laws on private businesses unconstitutional.
Public access laws should only apply to government entities.

Seems precedent sentence structure of the supreme swastika up Uranus court lynching enforcement for the assassination of JFK after baptizing thine eyes by urination & another Rehnquist immaculate drug conception for some fabricated misnomer attempted assault on SCOTUS Kennedy to protect & serve Arab terrorists that threatened POTUS & to nuke Temple Mount prior to 9/11 must be language "serve the Pope or die" & "death to the infidels" Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities find too native...….

Little early for that much crack, doncha think?

Ya KKKrack me up. SCOTUS abortions in gravity of a master race master plan being exposed must be new to a totalitarian of the Islamidiotocracy where SCOTUS deems immaculate drug conceptions as the law of the land; whether it be to protect & serve thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists or Arab terrorists which in all probability were training for 9/11.

 

[Muhammed]

NFIB v Sebelius

 

[saltydancin]

NFIB v Sebelius

Where in the O'bummer unaffordable health care act do SCOTUS abortions in gravity of a master race master plan being exposed must be new to a totalitarian of the Islamidiotocracy where SCOTUS deems immaculate drug conceptions as the law of the land; whether it be to protect & serve thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists or Arab terrorists which in all probability were training for 9/11.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Dunno, maybe overturn 16th Amendment

 

[Muhammed]

NFIB v Sebelius

Where in the O'bummer unaffordable health care act do SCOTUS abortions in gravity of a master race master plan being exposed must be new to a totalitarian of the Islamidiotocracy where SCOTUS deems immaculate drug conceptions as the law of the land; whether it be to protect & serve thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists or Arab terrorists which in all probability were training for 9/11.

Don't post drunk.

 

[saltydancin]

NFIB v Sebelius

Where in the O'bummer unaffordable health care act do SCOTUS abortions in gravity of a master race master plan being exposed must be new to a totalitarian of the Islamidiotocracy where SCOTUS deems immaculate drug conceptions as the law of the land; whether it be to protect & serve thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists or Arab terrorists which in all probability were training for 9/11.

Don't post drunk.

Just what's needed, another immaculate conception of Islam in that flying carpet, flaming chariot genre......that SCOTUS rules by so well.