Coloradomtnman
Rational and proud of it.
You don't understand a lot of things. In this case, it would be the difference between responding to the thread and declaring that the thread shouldn't exist because I don't believe in the premise.
You'll notice, if you pull your head out, that I've never gone to a thread and said, "You're all stupid for discussing this at all." If I think it's a stupid thread, I just don't go there.
Thank you for taking the time to post an attack that's utterly apropos of nothing I said, though. I can always count on you.
I note, by the way, that you yourself have contributed nothing substantial to this topic, saying only, "Any disagreement from religious people will be viewed by me as an attack on you, and I will jump in to crow about how mean they are." Did you have anything real to contribute, or are you just like Huggy?
I thought N4mddissent pretty much said everything that needed to be said in his OP and his response to your first posting here. I agree with his point of view. I also think its futile to communicate with you as you see any argument against religion or Christianity as an attack, not to mention that you insult people and get personal in your responses. Then you misrepresent what you said in an earlier post when someone uses what you said in that post against you. And you call them an idiot for somehow misunderstanding what you wrote.
When you can post something that's relevant, discussable; and isn't dripping with dogmatic blindness, insults, and contempt; and when you understand what the OP was actually saying so that communicating with you isn't a complete waste of time and effort, then I would gladly do so. However, that isn't the case.