What is Wrong With This?

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Nonelitist, Jul 6, 2010.

  1. Nonelitist
    Offline

    Nonelitist BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,235
    Thanks Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +183
    I am not sure I can believe my eyes on this one... does anyone else notice something outrageous about this paragraph in the article?

    FOXNews.com - Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case

    "The Bush Justice Department brought the first case against three members of the group, accusing them in a civil complaint of violating the Voter Rights Act. The Obama administration initially pursued the case, winning a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panther members did not appear in court. But then the administration moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a "deadly weapon" near a polling place until 2012."
     
  2. JScott
    Offline

    JScott I check facts.

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,538
    Thanks Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +93
    No.
     
  3. Nonelitist
    Offline

    Nonelitist BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,235
    Thanks Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +183
    ok.. maybe I am misinterpreting something... but I am going to leave this open to further comment before commenting myself.
     
  4. The Infidel
    Offline

    The Infidel EVIL CONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    17,252
    Thanks Received:
    3,170
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    AMERITOPIA
    Ratings:
    +3,173
    The outrageous thing is that the charges were dropped.

    How dare we try to convict the "Black" panthers of something that even they admitted to doing :cuckoo:
     
  5. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,387
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,404
    Several things

    "bush justice department"

    It also confirms that the administration considered what they were carrying was in fact DEADLY WEAPONS.

    It also in interesting and very telling... that a time line is given 2012

    And the apparent approval of the administration condoning voter intimidation, just not with deadly weapons. Is the administration also saying that it alright for the KKK to stand in front of polling places in white sheets, just so long as they aren't carrying weapons?

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2010
  6. Nonelitist
    Offline

    Nonelitist BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,235
    Thanks Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +183
    The dropped the charges because one of them agreed to not have a deadly weapon at a polling place until 2012?

    So... commit a serious crime.... promise that you won't do it again for 4 years and you don't get prosecuted?

    WTF?

    And liberals want these jackasses in charge of prosecuting terrorists?

    The world is upside down.
     
  7. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    I promise I won't speed or run stop signs until 2016.

    If I can drive drunk tonight, that is.
     
  8. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,387
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,404

    Amnesty at work already ya know. Now i am not saying these men are illegals, but is working out like the obama amnesty program. Wasn't that part of the illegal amnesty, Promise you wont commit any more crime?

    I guess now we can do all the shit we want, get caught, and say we wont do it again. uhhuh.
     
  9. peach174
    Offline

    peach174 Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    20,613
    Thanks Received:
    4,064
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    S.E. AZ
    Ratings:
    +7,453
    Don't let anyone. No matter who it is or what they might yell at you, to try and intimidate your right to vote this fall election.
     
  10. Nonelitist
    Offline

    Nonelitist BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,235
    Thanks Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +183
    2% of me can see the argument that someone says they will never commit the crime again... but asking someone to not do it for a limited time... until a specific year?

    That is seriously f'd up.... wtf?

    I can't believe it... this is one of the most stupid things I have ever seen... someone explain this reasoning to me.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2010

Share This Page