What is wrong with being gay exactly?

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

So when the slaves were freed they were given 'special' rights that 'superseded' those who disagreed with them?

Goddam, you've caught Where are my Keys disease.

Slaves were not exhibiting DEVIANT BEHAVIOR Gilligan.

Deviant behavior - as you call it - is constitutional.

No Gilligan, it's not. You 'feel' strongly that it is... but you've no means to sustain your 'feelings', thus such is merely a manifestation of the same mental disorder that presents as sexual deviancy.

You see you demand that such is true, where such is literally and inarguably false.

Where you are able to convince someone else of that drivel, you take the injury to yourself... and transmit it to another, proving that such is destructive.

Where such is transmitted to sufficient members of the culture, this makes it entirely unlikely that the culture will be capable of sustaining itself, and this by virtue of the culture's collective inability to discern the distinction between right and wrong. Thus their collective decisions, are likely to be flawed and where one strings together sufficient numbers of flawed decisions, one destroys their viability.

Such is as true for individuals as it is for the sum of individuals, OKA: The Culture, Society, Civilization.

Homosexual acts between consenting adults are constitutionally protected.

No they aren't.

 

[Carla_Danger]

What is that damage, specifically?

Well there is truly no limit to the destruction Gilligan, which is sorta what catastrophic means... .

But one example is the inability to discern a distinction between that which is right, thus sustainable and that which is wrong, thus unsustainable.

Unlimited destruction but you cannot specify what it is.

That is delusion.

Look up catastrophic Gilligan... Its time you learned what some of these big words mean. If you're going to stay in adult discussions, you're going to have to take responsibility for your own ignorance.

Really? Detail the catastrophic consequences.

That must mean when an all loving Gawd punishes us with bad weather??? I dunno, I give up.

Where_r_my_brains can't answer the question.

 

[Carla_Danger]

The Framers felt the need to expressly make it clear that the Government was not to infringe on the right of the people's right to practice their Religion.......and yet the Left screams that Gay people's "rights" are superior to Religious people's "rights".

Wow, for a moment I thought you were sane. Sorry, we have discrimination laws. You're free to practice whatever religion you like.

 

[Seawytch]

A "gay" man can likely have a child if he marries a person of the opposite sex. No one is stopping that. A sexually deviant person will never be truly happy no matter what some in a society choose to label such activity. And it isn't productive for society to promote deviant sexuality for the sake of being deviant. The only solidly rational for encouraging marriage is to foster well adjusted children. And as you say IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR 2 GAY MEN TO BE ADAM & EVE.

Gay men can adopt or use a surrogate. I gave birth to three babies for a gay male couple. Lesbians can also adopt or go to a sperm bank. No god, no sex with a member of the opposite gender needed.

The rest of your post is religious claptrap that has nothing to do with civil marriage.

You're their mother. No matter what perverted "family" scheme you Leftists come up with, every baby has just one mother and one father.

Even if you do a swirl.

No, I'm not their mother. I was their oven. Wasn't my egg. They used a donor egg and their sperm. I think the twins had two different fathers.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted Gilligan.

As always, you did the very best you can... .

Cite ONE harm to society that occurs when two women have sex.

There is no harm involved.

Why does their sex life warrant special rights?

Rights that they feel must be super imposed the rights of others.....

They don't want special rights.

Of course they do.

They demand that their "rights" supercede the "rights" of those who disagree with them.

So when the slaves were freed they were given 'special' rights that 'superseded' those who disagreed with them?

Goddam, you've caught Where are my Keys disease.

That's Where_r_my_brains!!!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Framers felt the need to expressly make it clear that the Government was not to infringe on the right of the people's right to practice their Religion.......and yet the Left screams that Gay people's "rights" are superior to Religious people's "rights".

Ignorant nonsense.

No one is 'screaming' anything.

The 14th Amendment jurisprudence requiring the states to allow same-sex couples access to marriage law applies solely to government, not private persons or private organizations, such as churches.

Should the Court reverse the Sixth Circuit, allowing same-sex couples to access marriage law in all 50 states in accordance with the Constitution, churches and other religious entities will remain at liberty to refuse to accommodate same-sex couples in religious marriage, where government will in no way 'infringe' on the right of the people to practice their religion.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

A "gay" man can likely have a child if he marries a person of the opposite sex. No one is stopping that. A sexually deviant person will never be truly happy no matter what some in a society choose to label such activity. And it isn't productive for society to promote deviant sexuality for the sake of being deviant. The only solidly rational for encouraging marriage is to foster well adjusted children. And as you say IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR 2 GAY MEN TO BE ADAM & EVE.

Gay men can adopt or use a surrogate. I gave birth to three babies for a gay male couple. Lesbians can also adopt or go to a sperm bank. No god, no sex with a member of the opposite gender needed.

The rest of your post is religious claptrap that has nothing to do with civil marriage.

You're their mother. No matter what perverted "family" scheme you Leftists come up with, every baby has just one mother and one father.

Even if you do a swirl.

No, I'm not their mother. I was their oven. Wasn't my egg. They used a donor egg and their sperm. I think the twins had two different fathers.

That doesn't change the fact you're their mother. You all carry on with this freak show trying to change what can't be changed, that children are made with one man and one woman. The only difference is that children will grow up confused as to who their parents really are. They are independent human beings and will eventually make up their own minds. Surrogate eggs and semen swirls can't change the basic structure of the family.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Should the Court reverse the Sixth Circuit, allowing same-sex couples to access marriage law in all 50 states...

the SCOTUS will no longer have any relevance to Americans, who's consent to be governed, will be summarily and finally withdrawn.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

A "gay" man can likely have a child if he marries a person of the opposite sex. No one is stopping that. A sexually deviant person will never be truly happy no matter what some in a society choose to label such activity. And it isn't productive for society to promote deviant sexuality for the sake of being deviant. The only solidly rational for encouraging marriage is to foster well adjusted children. And as you say IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR 2 GAY MEN TO BE ADAM & EVE.

Gay men can adopt or use a surrogate. I gave birth to three babies for a gay male couple. Lesbians can also adopt or go to a sperm bank. No god, no sex with a member of the opposite gender needed.

The rest of your post is religious claptrap that has nothing to do with civil marriage.

You're their mother. No matter what perverted "family" scheme you Leftists come up with, every baby has just one mother and one father.

Even if you do a swirl.

No, I'm not their mother. I was their oven. Wasn't my egg. They used a donor egg and their sperm. I think the twins had two different fathers.

That doesn't change the fact you're their mother. You all carry on with this freak show trying to change what can't be changed, that children are made with one man and one woman. The only difference is that children will grow up confused as to who their parents really are. They are independent human beings and will eventually make up their own minds. Surrogate eggs and semen swirls can't change the basic structure of the family.

There's no evil greater than one wherein children are conceived in order to be given to sexual deviants... Christ made it clear that such people would be better off tying a millstone around their neck and throwing it into the sea, than to stand in judgment before God having harmed children in this life.

 

[Syriusly]

A "gay" man can likely have a child if he marries a person of the opposite sex. No one is stopping that. A sexually deviant person will never be truly happy no matter what some in a society choose to label such activity. And it isn't productive for society to promote deviant sexuality for the sake of being deviant. The only solidly rational for encouraging marriage is to foster well adjusted children. And as you say IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR 2 GAY MEN TO BE ADAM & EVE.

Gay men can adopt or use a surrogate. I gave birth to three babies for a gay male couple. Lesbians can also adopt or go to a sperm bank. No god, no sex with a member of the opposite gender needed.

The rest of your post is religious claptrap that has nothing to do with civil marriage.

You're their mother. No matter what perverted "family" scheme you Leftists come up with, every baby has just one mother and one father.

Even if you do a swirl.

No, I'm not their mother. I was their oven. Wasn't my egg. They used a donor egg and their sperm. I think the twins had two different fathers.

That doesn't change the fact you're their mother. You all carry on with this freak show trying to change what can't be changed, that children are made with one man and one woman. The only difference is that children will grow up confused as to who their parents really are. They are independent human beings and will eventually make up their own minds. Surrogate eggs and semen swirls can't change the basic structure of the family.

Why would they grow up confused?

Children born from artificial insemination don't grow up 'confused' who their 'real' parents are. Children born of surrogacy don't grow up confused who their 'real' parents are.

Thousands of children are adopted every year- for the most part children abandoned by their biological parents- the people who adopt them are their 'real' parents- the ones who care enough to step up and be parents.

 

[Syriusly]

A "gay" man can likely have a child if he marries a person of the opposite sex. No one is stopping that. A sexually deviant person will never be truly happy no matter what some in a society choose to label such activity. And it isn't productive for society to promote deviant sexuality for the sake of being deviant. The only solidly rational for encouraging marriage is to foster well adjusted children. And as you say IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR 2 GAY MEN TO BE ADAM & EVE.

Gay men can adopt or use a surrogate. I gave birth to three babies for a gay male couple. Lesbians can also adopt or go to a sperm bank. No god, no sex with a member of the opposite gender needed.

The rest of your post is religious claptrap that has nothing to do with civil marriage.

You're their mother. No matter what perverted "family" scheme you Leftists come up with, every baby has just one mother and one father.

Even if you do a swirl.

No, I'm not their mother. I was their oven. Wasn't my egg. They used a donor egg and their sperm. I think the twins had two different fathers.

That doesn't change the fact you're their mother. You all carry on with this freak show trying to change what can't be changed, that children are made with one man and one woman. The only difference is that children will grow up confused as to who their parents really are. They are independent human beings and will eventually make up their own minds. Surrogate eggs and semen swirls can't change the basic structure of the family.

There's no evil greater than one wherein children are conceived in order to be given to sexual deviants... Christ made it clear that such people would be better off tying a millstone around their neck and throwing it into the sea, than to stand in judgment before God having harmed children in this life.

You are a lunatic.

 

[Lumpy 1]

I don't think actual Gays have a choice but non-the-less they like to promote their lifestyle to others who really don't need the added confusion in their lives...

 

[Syriusly]

T...and yet the Left screams that Gay people's "rights" are superior to Religious people's "rights".

Only the lunatic fringe on the right here those screams.

No ones rights are superior to another's rights.

The 1964 Civil Rights Acts says that business's cannot discriminate against customers because of their color or religion. Religious rights protected.

Notice- no protection there for 'gays'.

Some states also say that business's cannot discriminate against customers because of sexual orientation- that means both Christians and Gays have the same rights against discrimination- in those states.

 

[Syriusly]

Yes- you think swimming pools are a disease just like you think 'gay' is a disease

. As I said, the CDC tracks diseases, you know, like gays.

And you are lying again.

Not lying by saying the CDC tracks diseases- because it does- lying because you know that the CDC does not consider gays to be a disease.

No more than the CDC thinks swimming pools are a disease. Or teen driving.

You are just a liar.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

On the topic of 'What's Evil; THIS JUST IN:

"Three-way Marriages May Now Be Legalized"

Liberals want to destroy God-ordained definition of marriage. The Supreme Court is now debating about same-sex marriage but the next battle is already in its early stages in Europe…then coming to America.

According to Breitbart, the Green Party in the U.K. has announced that they are “open” to legalizing threeway marriages in the country.

During a recent Q&A, reporter Jon Barrett asked Green Party leader Natalie Bennett, “As someone living with his two boyfriends in a stable long-term relationship, I would like to know what your stance is on polyamory rights. Is there room for Green support on group civil partnerships or marriages?”

“We have led the way on many issues related to the liberalisation of legal status in adult consenting relationships, and we are open to further conversation and consultation,” she replied.

One of the main criticisms people have for gay marriage is that it would create a “slippery slope” that would result in marriage being defined in many ridiculous ways.

“Why is the government saying there should be same sex marriages?” Conservative MP Matthew Offord asked the House of Commons when gay marriage was being legalized. “Why should it not also be blood relatives? Why should it not also be polygamists? It seems they are rushing this forward and they have not thought out what the consequences are going to be.”
“What will our successors be discussing and have to legislate for in the future? Polygamy? Three-way relationships? Who knows what else?” his colleague Craig Whittaker also asked.

This news comes the same week that the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Congress found that polygamy quadruples the risk of heart disease.
“We found an association between an increasing number of wives and the severity and number of coronary blockages,” said the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
“This could be because the need to provide and maintain separate households multiplies the financial burden and emotional expense,” they added. “Each household must be treated fairly and equally, and it seems likely that the stress of doing that for several spouses and possibly several families of children is considerable.”

Europe once paved the way for gay marriage to be brought up in the U.S. Should Britain legalize threeway marriages, it won’t be long before it makes it’s way to the U.S. God only knows what’s next…

Green Party Open to Permitting Three-Way Marriages - Breitbart
​

 

[Syriusly]

On the topic of 'What's Evil; THIS JUST IN:

"Three-way Marriages May Now Be Legalized"​

​

You are a loon.

 

[kaz]

All government is, is US. And the only reason we form a government is so that we can GOVERN HUMAN BEHAVIOR

That's sure the hell not why I want government. I want government for only those things that cannot function unless there is general recognition. The police, civil and criminal courts and military to protect us. Recognition of property rights. Management of limited resources, etc. The only behavior government should have a say over is when one person's right limits someone else's rights. For example, I have the right to my property, you don't have the right to blast music above certain volumes at certain times on my property. You want to screw a guy in the privacy of your own home, that's not a legitimate function of government.

 

[kaz]

And you are lying again.

Not lying by saying the CDC tracks diseases- because it does- lying because you know that the CDC does not consider gays to be a disease

you just contradicted yourself, liar

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

A "gay" man can likely have a child if he marries a person of the opposite sex. No one is stopping that. A sexually deviant person will never be truly happy no matter what some in a society choose to label such activity. And it isn't productive for society to promote deviant sexuality for the sake of being deviant. The only solidly rational for encouraging marriage is to foster well adjusted children. And as you say IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR 2 GAY MEN TO BE ADAM & EVE.

Gay men can adopt or use a surrogate. I gave birth to three babies for a gay male couple. Lesbians can also adopt or go to a sperm bank. No god, no sex with a member of the opposite gender needed.

The rest of your post is religious claptrap that has nothing to do with civil marriage.

You're their mother. No matter what perverted "family" scheme you Leftists come up with, every baby has just one mother and one father.

Even if you do a swirl.

No, I'm not their mother. I was their oven. Wasn't my egg. They used a donor egg and their sperm. I think the twins had two different fathers.

That doesn't change the fact you're their mother. You all carry on with this freak show trying to change what can't be changed, that children are made with one man and one woman. The only difference is that children will grow up confused as to who their parents really are. They are independent human beings and will eventually make up their own minds. Surrogate eggs and semen swirls can't change the basic structure of the family.

Why would they grow up confused?

Children born from artificial insemination don't grow up 'confused' who their 'real' parents are. Children born of surrogacy don't grow up confused who their 'real' parents are.

Thousands of children are adopted every year- for the most part children abandoned by their biological parents- the people who adopt them are their 'real' parents- the ones who care enough to step up and be parents.

You're wrong. Many kids who grew up in adopted homes seek out their biological parents, even if they were given a wonderful upbringing. This will be especially true when they are deliberately conceived to be put in a situation where they are deprived of a mother or a father and they see their friends who have both.

We're going to start seeing kids raised by faggots murdering their "parents" in their sleep. As far as I'm concerned, they are innocent of any wrongdoing.

You perverts got it coming to you.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

A "gay" man can likely have a child if he marries a person of the opposite sex. No one is stopping that. A sexually deviant person will never be truly happy no matter what some in a society choose to label such activity. And it isn't productive for society to promote deviant sexuality for the sake of being deviant. The only solidly rational for encouraging marriage is to foster well adjusted children. And as you say IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR 2 GAY MEN TO BE ADAM & EVE.

Gay men can adopt or use a surrogate. I gave birth to three babies for a gay male couple. Lesbians can also adopt or go to a sperm bank. No god, no sex with a member of the opposite gender needed.

The rest of your post is religious claptrap that has nothing to do with civil marriage.

You're their mother. No matter what perverted "family" scheme you Leftists come up with, every baby has just one mother and one father.

Even if you do a swirl.

No, I'm not their mother. I was their oven. Wasn't my egg. They used a donor egg and their sperm. I think the twins had two different fathers.

That doesn't change the fact you're their mother. You all carry on with this freak show trying to change what can't be changed, that children are made with one man and one woman. The only difference is that children will grow up confused as to who their parents really are. They are independent human beings and will eventually make up their own minds. Surrogate eggs and semen swirls can't change the basic structure of the family.

There's no evil greater than one wherein children are conceived in order to be given to sexual deviants... Christ made it clear that such people would be better off tying a millstone around their neck and throwing it into the sea, than to stand in judgment before God having harmed children in this life.

It's horrible. Can you imagine being one of these kids knowing they could have had a normal life with a loving mother AND father but instead were deliberately spawned to gratify perverts and their selfish obsession to create the illusion of "family"?

I won't even blink when these kids start killing their creepy, queer "parents" in their sleep.

Children have the right to defend themselves against such a filthy sexual imposition even with the use of deadly force.