What is the IPCC

[jc456]

Where do you get the idea that the consensus among scientists is getting weaker? The chronology of studies noted in the three Wikipedia articles on the topic all show growing agreement with the IPCC.

Whatever gets you to sleep at night

 

[Crick]

Where do you get the idea that the consensus among scientists is getting weaker? The chronology of studies noted in the three Wikipedia articles on the topic all show growing agreement with the IPCC.

Also still waiting for you to correct my description of the Earth's climate... unless you've taken the other option.

 

[Crick]

Where do you get the idea that the consensus among scientists is getting weaker? The chronology of studies noted in the three Wikipedia articles on the topic all show growing agreement with the IPCC.

Whatever gets you to sleep at night

JC, do you remember what Thumper's mom told him? "If you haven't got anything nice [intelligent] to say, don't say anything at all". It's good advice JC.

 

[jc456]

Where do you get the idea that the consensus among scientists is getting weaker? The chronology of studies noted in the three Wikipedia articles on the topic all show growing agreement with the IPCC.

Whatever gets you to sleep at night

JC, do you remember what Thumper's mom told him? "If you haven't got anything nice [intelligent] to say, don't say anything at all". It's good advice JC.

Goes both ways now back to the OP

 

[Crick]

Where do you get the idea that the consensus among scientists is getting weaker? The chronology of studies noted in the three Wikipedia articles on the topic all show growing agreement with the IPCC.

Wiki....what more need be said!

A real response would be a good start. The references on those articles list dozens of links to the actual material. Everything there may be easily verified. If you think any of it is false, show us. As is, your response is utterly meaningless and without content.

 

[jc456]

Well would you take a look at this:
Link to article.
Cooks 97 consensus disproven by a new peer reviewed paper showing major math errors Watts Up With That

Abstract:
"The new paper by the leading climatologist Dr David Legates and his colleagues, published in the respected Science and Education journal, now in its 21st year of publication, reveals that Cook had not considered whether scientists and their published papers had said climate change was “dangerous”.

The consensus Cook considered was the standard definition: that Man had caused most post-1950 warming. Even on this weaker definition the true consensus among published scientific papers is now demonstrated to be not 97.1%, as Cook had claimed, but only 0.3%.

Only 41 out of the 11,944 published climate papers Cook examined explicitly stated that Man caused most of the warming since 1950. Cook himself had flagged just 64 papers as explicitly supporting that consensus, but 23 of the 64 had not in fact supported it."