What is the first thing you think of when you look at this?

you see your rewrites of history will not be allowed to stand in the face of facts.


You have been warned so pursue your lies at your own risk.
 
The "War of Northern Aggression" (Civil War) was clearly about "States Rights"

The Confederates believed in the U.S. Constitution as written out by the Founding Fathers.


The people of the Northern Union were much like the lefty liberals today.

Who believe the Constitution was written on a sheet of rubber and can be pulled and streched any which way to suit their current agenda. :doubt:
 
Rewrites of histroy will not be allowed for poltical purposes.


You will lose this fight EVERYTIME.

The civil war would have never taken place if slavery had not exsisted in the US at the time.

It was about slavery
 
January 1861 -- The South Secedes.
When Abraham Lincoln, a known opponent of slavery, was elected president, the South Carolina legislature perceived a threat


The first fucking line of your timeline link asshole

Lets remember what you idiots are claiming and failing miserably to achieve
 
Rewrites of histroy will not be allowed for poltical purposes.


You will lose this fight EVERYTIME.

The civil war would have never taken place if slavery had not exsisted in the US at the time.

It was about slavery

NO SHIT!!! REALLY?!?!?

:slap:
 
The "War of Northern Aggression" (Civil War) was clearly about "States Rights"

The Confederates believed in the U.S. Constitution as written out by the Founding Fathers.


The people of the Northern Union were much like the lefty liberals today.
Who believe the Constitution was written on a sheet of rubber and can be pulled and streched any which way to suit their current agenda. :doubt:

:clap2::clap2:
 
Don't deny the fact, DownssyndromeMatters, that the state's rights argument is also valid. But saying that it was one without the other is being disingenuous at best. It was over the issue of a state's right to have slavery be legal.

END OF FUCKING ARGUMENT!!!!!
 
Slavery. There is a long long long long long history of slavery and it did not begin and end in the United States of America. Remember when those of Northern Egypt enslaved the Jewish people? You don't hear anyone bitching about that. Wonder why? It befuddles me.
 
Don't deny the fact, DownssyndromeMatters, that the state's rights argument is also valid. But saying that it was one without the other is being disingenuous at best. It was over the issue of a state's right to have slavery be legal.

END OF FUCKING ARGUMENT!!!!!

That war ended in 1865. Libruls still hate the Southern people to this very day. By that logic they should hate the Egyptians too don'tchyathink?
 
grow the fuck up

whambulance.jpg
 
Slavery. There is a long long long long long history of slavery and it did not begin and end in the United States of America. Remember when those of Northern Egypt enslaved the Jewish people? You don't hear anyone bitching about that. Wonder why? It befuddles me.

Left : "Slavery = racism = America" [/end] (nothing more, nothing less)
 
The "War of Northern Aggression" (Civil War) was clearly about "States Rights"

The Confederates believed in the U.S. Constitution as written out by the Founding Fathers.


The people of the Northern Union were much like the lefty liberals today.

Who believe the Constitution was written on a sheet of rubber and can be pulled and streched any which way to suit their current agenda. :doubt:
Suuuure...and Mo is a pedo.

:thup:
 
History will NOT bend for your political purposes.

Give it up , you will NEVER win
 
This is about history willow.

take your insane bullshit to another thread

Speaking of insane bull shit... there's no one on this board that spreads more incoherent bull shit than you, and in this thread, you sound like you've already polished off a twelve pack of beer and half a bottle of cheap vodka.

Please, shut the fuck up and go away you pathetic piece of shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top