What is Meant When Someone Uses the Words "Un-American" or "Anti-American"

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Coloradomtnman, Apr 18, 2010.

  1. Coloradomtnman
    Offline

    Coloradomtnman Rational and proud of it.

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,311
    Thanks Received:
    863
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Denver
    Ratings:
    +1,495
    What is Meant When Someone Uses the Words "Un-American" or "Anti-American" about another American?

    Do they mean that the person wants to destroy the U.S. outright, not just the government but its citizens and culture?

    Because I can't think of what else it might mean.

    The terms seem to be used a lot more than is safe. I do remember my history lessons, and no body thinks what McCarthy did was a just thing.

    I hear conservatives accusing the President of being un-American or anti-American and I would like to ask, "What exactly do you mean by that?"

    If you mean that he is trying to cause the end of the United States as a nation, I have to disagree and wonder what could cause someone to react so vehemently to his political perspective. If they mean that he is attempting to destroy the American ideal, then I would like an explanation of what the American ideal is?

    From my point of view the American ideal is a government which is a democratic republic, which is a government by the people for the people. I don't see how Obama isn't representing his consituency. I'm an American and he's doing (if not exactly what I would like) just fine by me. I could want him do more, and do things which are more to my liking(like a single payer system for health care - but at least we made the first step...), but I don't see how reacting as though he is trying to destroy us is valid.

    I don't see how socialism and freedom are not synonymous (especially when I look at almost all other Western democracies...) unless one believes freedom means acquiring wealth and property. That's just how I see it. If you don't see it that way I don't think you're un-American or anti-American, its just how you see it. You believe that government shouldn't do all the things that I think it should. You don't think government is a tool for the people the way I believe it is. Ok. No big deal.

    Pale Rider and I could hang out in a bar, drinking whiskey and telling stories. Perhaps if we started talking politics we'd come to blows (though I would hope not) - but otherwise we'd get along just fine. I don't think he's trying to harm people or is evil or is a traitor or is a bad person. The way he sees things is the way he sees things, and the way he believes is just the way he believes and the only thing that's gonna change him is him - not me. So I can get angry, call him names, get physical, and end up nothing to show for it but a new enemy - one who is one of my countrymen, an American. Just like I am.

    Or we can talk about things, and maybe see the world in a broader frame of mind, become friends instead of enemies, and maybe even find a solution that works for both of us. And if it doesn't work perfectly, at least the compromise is better than nothing but potential hatred and violence from both sides. Take the the current health care reform, which IMHO, kinda sucks, but I do like it better than it was: no more pre-existing conditions, more purchasing power for small businesses, etc. And I don't know for a fact, but I could guess that Pale Rider doesn't like the new system either, but there must be something about that even he thinks ais an improvement on the old system.

    So he and I could hate eachother because we don't like what the other wants, or we could think that its not all bad and at least we don't hate each other.

    Because that's what I think someone means when they say "un-American" or "anti-American" - that they hate who it is they're accusing of such ambiguous, nebulous, and vaguely bad intentions or behavior - its no longer just disagreement.

    You could just let it go and live for today.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  2. jswiftproposal
    Offline

    jswiftproposal Registered Baby-Cannibal

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    74
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +20
    yeah..... what he said.....

    no but seriously THANK YOU for writing that... thank you.... so much... :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2:
     
  3. PubliusInfinitum
    Offline

    PubliusInfinitum BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    6,805
    Thanks Received:
    725
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +726

    It means that the other person stands against the principles on which America was founded...

    Most often, this is directed towards those individuals who adhere to the principle-less notions of the Ideological Left. As the full measure of that ideology stands in diametric opposition to those Immutable American Principles...

    Often Leftists are found lamenting their being unqualified for the title of American... usually found defining the definition of America DOWN to the lowest common denominator; rendering the value of the term to meaningless... typically one wherein America amounts to a term of geography.

    So the SAME idiot that DEMANDS THAT "THEY'RE AMERICANS TOO!" need to define what being an American IS... down to being absolutely NOTHING!
     
  4. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,755
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,757
    Seems pretty clear to me.

     
  5. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,750
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    Then you need to look more closely.

    In the American ideal you can do what you like, if you want to share all your money or form groups to do that, you are free to do so and free not to do so.

    In the socialist ideal you have no choice, your freedom is curtailed and you must submit or be punished.

    Socialism can NEVER be synonymous with freedom no matter how badly you may want it to be so.
     
  6. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    I wish elections mattered to people.

    When we have a litgitimate election then theresults should be respected.

    There are a few Americans today who dont think elections matter.
     
  7. Foxfyre
    Offline

    Foxfyre Eternal optimist Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    47,685
    Thanks Received:
    10,799
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Desert Southwest USA
    Ratings:
    +14,396
    I honestly don't know what anybody else means when they define something as 'anti-American'.

    What that term means when I use it, however, means opposition to the principles the Founders wrote into the Constitution, aversion to some or even many of the traditional values that have defined a uniquely American culture, and/or distrust of the people as competent and capable of governing themselves. It is generally targeted at those who see only the warts and flaws and don't appreciate America as the great and successful experiment that it was and is. It refers to those who despise America for perceived sins and refuse to recognize its basic goodness and compassion and generosity, or why setting many tens of millions of people free to chart their own destiny is a remarkable thing. And sometimes it includes some of our citizens who so admire Europe and think America the inferior entity who should emulate them.
     
  8. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    Caging (voter suppression) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I think this is clearly unAmerican



    1980s
    In 1981 and 1986 the Republican National Committee (RNC) sent out letters to predominately African-American neighborhoods. When tens of thousands of them were returned undeliverable, the party successfully challenged the voters and had them deleted from voting rolls. Due to the violation of the Voting Rights Act, the RNC was taken to court. Its officials entered a consent decree which prohibited the party from engaging in anti-fraud initiatives that targeted minorities or conducting mail campaigns to "compile voter challenge lists."[5]

    [edit] 2004 US Election
    BBC journalist Greg Palast obtained an RNC document entitled "State Implementation Template III.doc" that described Republican election operations for caging plans in numerous states. The paragraph in the document pertaining to caging was:
     
  9. Luissa
    Offline

    Luissa Annoying Customer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    43,190
    Thanks Received:
    5,593
    Trophy Points:
    1,785
    Location:
    TARDIS
    Ratings:
    +5,664
    I think both terms are used way too much by the right, along with unpatriotic.

    It also pisses me off when someone like Pubes, a complete douch bag who obviously hates most of his fellow man calls me or someone else un American.
     
  10. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,324
    Thanks Received:
    19,835
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,380
    By "Un-American"

    They mean that "our side lost" and anyone who does not follow our failed agenda is obviously un-american.
     

Share This Page