Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
rIf the Rs thought calling the whistleblower would help Trump, he'd be in the Senate right now. They're afraid of more evidence. None of it will help Trump.
I don't think you get it - if you're on the side that's fighting for less information and less evidence, you're on the wrong side. You're being played.
No information ever came out of a leftist propaganda circus.
You've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.
Is that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
Biden himself bragged about it, calling you a dumbass would be insulting all other dumbasses. Sheesh.My prediction is this lie about Biden being promoted by Trump will be one of the enduring legacies of the 2020 campaign. Much like the lies about Hillary will live forever in the corrupted minds of Trumpette's.It’s ironic that Donny gets impeached for asking another nation to look into Biden’s admitted corruption.
SURPRISE, SURPRISE: THE DOJ’S HILLARY CLINTON INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN A BUST
Surprise, Surprise: The DOJ’s Hillary Clinton Investigation Has Been a Bust
No information ever came out of a leftist propaganda circus.
You've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.
Is that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
Well, sure, if your goal is to hide evidence, that's an argument. I posted so yesterday a couple of times. Part of the point is for voters to see the Rs and Trump hiding evidence. Democrats have known all along that the Rs would run a cover-up for Trump. They had surrendered their own power previously, when Trump declared phony emergencies for arms sales and diverting funds. The congresscritters and functionaries of the Party of Trump are the most cowardly bunch of quislings to ever don pastel tutus. With luck, enough voters will see that. Good luck, that is. Bad luck and you and King Donald (First of his Name, Breaker of Deals) will flush democracy down the toilet.
What could we learn from all those documents and all the witness testimony Dems are requesting?
If the evidence the Orange Fraud is obstructing was beneficial to him logic dictates he allow it to be revealed.
But every bit of documentary evidence and every witness's testimony revealed thus far shows Don's guilt.
It shows Baby Donald did exactly what he is accused of doing.
And that is why he doesn't want Pandora's box to be opened.
What is Pandoras Box? Well, Pandora was a hooker in TJ and her box was Legendary.
Lolololollol the Trump yelling on a cellphone as evidence!!! Fucking priceless!!1. Trump empowered Giuliani to employ the help of various members of the US diplomatic contingent to Ukraine, and some who were not part of that contingent, to put pressure on Ukraine to announce an investigation in to Joe Biden. A campaign that began in the spring of 2019. Trump directed Ukraine pressure, US diplomat saysThe usual load of bullshit. There is zero evidence against Trump, shit for brains.What could we learn from all those documents and all the witness testimony Dems are requesting?
If the evidence the Orange Fraud is obstructing was beneficial to him logic dictates he allow it to be revealed.
But every bit of documentary evidence and every witness's testimony revealed thus far shows Don's guilt.
It shows Baby Donald did exactly what he is accused of doing.
And that is why he doesn't want Pandora's box to be opened.
2. Leverage was used, at Trump's direction, as a means to get Ukraine to acquiesce to Trump's requests in the form of the withholding of military aid authorized by Congress.
"Clear direction from POTUS to continue hold."
https://www.justsecurity.org/67863/...ts-reveal-extent-of-pentagons-legal-concerns/
3. Resulting from the WB complaint, a summary of the transcript of the Zelensky call was released revealing Trump speaking to Zelensky about the investigations he wanted Ukraine to announce. A transcript WH officials tried to hide from other members of the government and the public by placing it in a code level secret server typically used for keeping national security matters secret. AP FACT CHECK: Trump's flawed 'read the transcript' defense
4. Trump and Sondland were overheard discussing the efforts to get Ukraine to announce an investigation in to Biden.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/21/imp...ow-he-overheard-trump-call-with-sondland.html
5. Officials in the admin and the Pentagon expressed concern the hold was illegal.
https://publicintegrity.org/nationa...rried-ukraine-aid-halt-violated-spending-law/
A GAO analysis of the laws pertaining to the hold found it was, in their opinion, illegal.
6. Ukrainian officials asked about the aid on the day Trump called Zelensky when he said, "I need you to do us a favor though," prior to asking Ukraine to investigate Biden (and the server).
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/20/ukr...ump-zelenskiy-call-impeachment-testimony.html
7. Part time, acting Chief-of-Staff Mick Mulvaney publicly acknowledged the quid pro quo.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/17/poli...d-pro-quo-donald-trump-ukraine-aid/index.html
So did EU ambassador Sondland.
Sondland acknowledges Ukraine quid pro quo, implicates Trump, Pence, Pompeo and others
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...741e3c-0b92-11ea-8397-a955cd542d00_story.html
8. US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch was relieved of her post by Trump as a result of a smear campaign launched against her by Giuliani because she posed on obstacle to carrying out the scheme to extort Ukraine. Defiant Yovanovitch says she was ‘kneecapped’ amid Trump 'smear campaign'
Lev Parnas recently stated her removal was directed as a payoff to get a Ukrainian official to produce dirt on Biden. https://slate.com/news-and-politics...risma-biden-dirt-fire-ukraine-ambassador.html
9. All of the 17 witnesses who testified during the House inquiry corroborate 1-8.
10. If any of the witnesses or documentary evidence Trump has blocked as part of his obstruction of the investigation can offer a refutation of the evidence above it is his prerogative to present it.
11. The solicitation of help in a US election from a foreign person or government is illegal.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...s-illegality-of-soliciting-campaign-help-from
And much, much more.
You've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.
Is that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
Well, sure, if your goal is to hide evidence, that's an argument. I posted so yesterday a couple of times. Part of the point is for voters to see the Rs and Trump hiding evidence. Democrats have known all along that the Rs would run a cover-up for Trump. They had surrendered their own power previously, when Trump declared phony emergencies for arms sales and diverting funds. The congresscritters and functionaries of the Party of Trump are the most cowardly bunch of quislings to ever don pastel tutus. With luck, enough voters will see that. Good luck, that is. Bad luck and you and King Donald (First of his Name, Breaker of Deals) will flush democracy down the toilet.
There ya go...depend on Luck and pray for ! LOL.
Might as well for all the good attacking America has done you so far.
rNo information ever came out of a leftist propaganda circus.
You've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.
Is that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
rYou've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.
Is that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
rIs that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
Why didn’t your people ask for the evidence when the process was in the House?rIs that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
rRead it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
Its sounds like demons being driven from a herd of swine. "Its not faaaaaairrrrrrr".
Now you’re just an idiot.r
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
Its sounds like demons being driven from a herd of swine. "Its not faaaaaairrrrrrr".
Now you're just trolling. If you come up with anything interesting, post it.
Why didn’t your people ask for the evidence when the process was in the House?rRead it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
rIs that another way of saying im on the winning side?
Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
You are behind the times. People recognize what is going on and simply put up with a certain amount of third world antics out of decency. *Nothing* the press says will make a difference. No matter the repetition or the volume. We simply dont care what you think and we dont need your approval do we?
Now you’re just an idiot.The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
Its sounds like demons being driven from a herd of swine. "Its not faaaaaairrrrrrr".
Now you're just trolling. If you come up with anything interesting, post it.
There is a process in the House that was followed.
Now it’s in the Senate.
Yes, they did.Why didn’t your people ask for the evidence when the process was in the House?r
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
They did ask for the evidence. As you know, if you have two brain cells. Is it as simple as asking for it?
All the “evidence” produced so far has been of less value than any waste.Now you’re just an idiot.Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
Its sounds like demons being driven from a herd of swine. "Its not faaaaaairrrrrrr".
Now you're just trolling. If you come up with anything interesting, post it.
There is a process in the House that was followed.
Now it’s in the Senate.
And the Senate - controlled by Repubs - wants to see as little evidence as possible.
Yes, they did.Why didn’t your people ask for the evidence when the process was in the House?The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
They did ask for the evidence. As you know, if you have two brain cells. Is it as simple as asking for it?
Now tell me what the response was and if the response was valid according to law.
All the “evidence” produced so far has been of less value than any waste.
Why didn’t your people ask for the evidence when the process was in the House?rRead it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.
Heres my argument...you lose. And you dont get to pick the testimony or evidence. Maybe a little less anti-Americanism and you could win an election and get to choose. But for now..you only have the power that comes from unelected and unAmerican corporations like CNN.
The House of Representatives doesn't count?
In the 2018 election, Democrats received 9.5 million more votes than the Rs, and in the past 7 Presidential elections, the Repubs have won the popular vote exactly once. You don't get to decide what is and isn't anti-Americanism more than any other American. It doesn't make you 'patriotic' to spew bullshit like that.
Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
Now you’re just an idiot.Of course I get to decide. And I elected a President to do it for me. Shouldn't you get back to telling us how right Iran is and how wrong America is?
I say again..if you want to make the rules then win an election. As for the rest of us the money power and deep state arent a substitute. So you have to take what you get...which is President Trump until 2025 and a Trump dominatedr Supreme Court for the rest of your life.
Learn to lose...and not so shrilly.
I'm not shrill. You're saying stupid stuff. You're on the side that wants less evidence and less information. You're being played.
Its sounds like demons being driven from a herd of swine. "Its not faaaaaairrrrrrr".
Now you're just trolling. If you come up with anything interesting, post it.
There is a process in the House that was followed.
Now it’s in the Senate.
And the Senate - controlled by Repubs - wants to see as little evidence as possible.
