What is an "ice age?"

[Crick]

Old Rocks doesn't like people who question his birdbrained left wing factless parroting. OR wants everyone to parrot with him - no thinking allowed. Try again, parrot. Your side went to court and LOST on

1. 90% of Earth ice INCREASING
2. no correlation between CO2 and temps in ice cores


Indeed, the level of idiocy required to believe Algore's FRAUD isn't human, it is this species...

I've been away for a bit. Did I miss you providing a link to some court case that actually came to the conclusions you claim?

 

[LaDexter]

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’


And what are those inaccuracies?

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

 

[Crick]

So, you ARE talking about Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education and Skills. As I have posted before now, the ACTUAL court opinion [Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education & Skills [2007] EWHC 2288 (Admin) (10 October 2007)] lists NINE items and the mapping between them and your list is poor. Additionally, the only actual result of this court case is that UK public school teachers are required to present a disclaimer based on the court's findings before showing the film. Dimmock's suit had sought to to have the school system stop showing the film and on that point he lost. The court's decision found the film's premise and presentation "broadly accurate". The court did NOT say that sea level was not rising nor that the evidence indicated it was not rising. The court did NOT say that the Antarctic ice mass balance was positive. In short, the court did not find what you have repeatedly said it found and lacks ANY of the significance you have repeatedly claimed it holds.

You have repeatedly been informed of the facts in this matter and are therefore CHOOSING to lie.

 

[LaDexter]

lists NINE items

The media really hates to admit Antarctic ice is growing...

the only actual result of this court case is that UK public school teachers are required to present a disclaimer based on the court's findings before showing the film.

LMFAO!!!

Two sides went to court, one side one, the other side didn't appeal, and now insists it really didn't lose....

LOL!!!


The greed of those behind the FRAUD is as limitless as Hillary's corruption.

 

[Crick]

I invite anyone who wonders which of us is accurately describing the results of this case to go to the COURT'S ACTUAL FINDING in this case at Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education & Skills [2007] EWHC 2288 (Admin) (10 October 2007)

 

[jc456]

I invite anyone who wonders which of us is accurately describing the results of this case to go to the COURT'S ACTUAL FINDING in this case at Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education & Skills [2007] EWHC 2288 (Admin) (10 October 2007)

what exactly are you arguing?

 

[LaDexter]

The Court's actual findings....


1. 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica INCREASING
2. NO CORRELATION between CO2 and temps in the ice cores


Warmers really really HATE that TRUTH.

 

[Crick]

"One side one"? !?!?

Holy fuck are you stupid.

SHOW US A STATEMENT FROM THE COURT MAKING THESE CLAIMS YOU LYING PIECE OF SHIT

The Court's actual findings....

1. 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica INCREASING
2. NO CORRELATION between CO2 and temps in the ice cores
/QUOTE]

 

[LaDexter]

Over and over I post it, and over and over our resident taxpayer funded fudge lover denies it...

 

[Crick]

I have never seen such a liar.

Again, the ACTUAL, OFFICIAL COURT'S CONCLUSION in this case may be read at
Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education & Skills [2007] EWHC 2288 (Admin) (10 October 2007)

and will clearly show that poster LaDexter has chosen to blatantly LIE through his teeth to us.