eagleseven
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
A "saved job" is a fluffy term that sounds beautiful and means nothing. Even leftist academics realize it's pure propaganda...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The stimulus has saved millions of jobs.
No question.
From the housing industry to the automotive industry to the contruction industy, the stimulus has done a good job of saving the economy.
A saved job?
Easy.
Had the States not gotten additional help from the FEDS they'd be firing even more people then they are right now.
So those people they did not have to fire (like teachers, cops and so forth) still have jobs thanks to the bailout.
The bailout isn't a success, but it's not entirely a failure either.
What is a saved job?
What is a saved job?
A saved job is the government's attempt to maintain the status quo. Companies fail all the time and people lose their jobs. In a free market economy, these failed companies are usually replaced by companies providing a better product or service. Some of these companies and jobs have become obsolete because a replacement has become available that is superior. Allowing poorly performing companies to fail can mean great progress.
And then came the big government politicians. By bailing out (using taxpayer dollars) a company like GM, they've essentially shut the door on the possibility that new and better start-ups would replace them. Same goes for the financial sector. To sell this lie to the American people, politicians say things like, "it's too big to fail" and "the entire sector will collapse if we don't do anything." In the end, it's just wealth redistribution of the worst kind. As a result, we are left with poorly performing companies and a lot of unpaid debt.
A saved job?
Easy.
Had the States not gotten additional help from the FEDS they'd be firing even more people then they are right now.
So those people they did not have to fire (like teachers, cops and so forth) still have jobs thanks to the bailout.
The bailout isn't a success, but it's not entirely a failure either.
A saved job?
Easy.
Had the States not gotten additional help from the FEDS they'd be firing even more people then they are right now.
So those people they did not have to fire (like teachers, cops and so forth) still have jobs thanks to the bailout.
The bailout isn't a success, but it's not entirely a failure either.
And proof that easy is often not correct.
As David Gregory demanded of the White House representative on the Sunday morning show, show me the concept of saved jobs, or the ability to calculate same in any Economics text.
Maybe he also saved BRAZILIAN jobs with the Olympics, too.OBAMA: I saved a million jobs today! I think I'll save a billion or maybe even a JILLION or a KAZILLION!! tomorrow!!
....
The stimulus has saved millions of jobs.
No question.
From the housing industry to the automotive industry to the contruction industy, the stimulus has done a good job of saving the economy.
Thank you for the consistency!
From global warming to healthcare to Obama-"job saving."
Your logic and grasp of concept remains at the same plateau!
In a world of change and dynamism, thank goodness we can count on your predictably vertiginous logic!
A saved job?
Easy.
Had the States not gotten additional help from the FEDS they'd be firing even more people then they are right now.
So those people they did not have to fire (like teachers, cops and so forth) still have jobs thanks to the bailout.
The bailout isn't a success, but it's not entirely a failure either.
And proof that easy is often not correct.
As David Gregory demanded of the White House representative on the Sunday morning show, show me the concept of saved jobs, or the ability to calculate same in any Economics text.
lolMaybe he also saved BRAZILIAN jobs with the Olympics, too.OBAMA: I saved a million jobs today! I think I'll save a billion or maybe even a JILLION or a KAZILLION!! tomorrow!!
....
A saved job?
Easy.
Had the States not gotten additional help from the FEDS they'd be firing even more people then they are right now.
So those people they did not have to fire (like teachers, cops and so forth) still have jobs thanks to the bailout.
The bailout isn't a success, but it's not entirely a failure either.
And proof that easy is often not correct.
As David Gregory demanded of the White House representative on the Sunday morning show, show me the concept of saved jobs, or the ability to calculate same in any Economics text.
I see them every day.
Without the stimulus the housing industry and the automobile insdustry would be in much worst shape.
Tough to admit you are wrong, eh?
And proof that easy is often not correct.
As David Gregory demanded of the White House representative on the Sunday morning show, show me the concept of saved jobs, or the ability to calculate same in any Economics text.
I see them every day.
Without the stimulus the housing industry and the automobile insdustry would be in much worst shape.
Tough to admit you are wrong, eh?
GM filed bankruptcy anyway. In the end all it did was to prolong the pain at the taxpayers expense.
Very much so. And it is ironic that Ford, having been in the same position as the other two, still managed to stay afloat without taking any of the stimulus money.And proof that easy is often not correct.
As David Gregory demanded of the White House representative on the Sunday morning show, show me the concept of saved jobs, or the ability to calculate same in any Economics text.
I see them every day.
Without the stimulus the housing industry and the automobile insdustry would be in much worst shape.
Tough to admit you are wrong, eh?
GM filed bankruptcy anyway. In the end all it did was to prolong the pain at the taxpayers expense.
Wrong.
The government kept a recession from becoming a depression.