Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What if our media would be nice enough to allow decent politicians onto political debates, who have something legitimate to say, instead of accusing each other as the two party circus clowns have been doing for decades? do you think our establishment media could do that, or no chance?
No such thing as a decent politician running for national office.
You are a true definition of n asshole, show me a link where I said anything like that, and if it's the video, quote the text part and what mark.Are you still promoting capital punishment for candidates who promote themselves beyond your state media, commie?
No such thing as a decent politician running for national office.
That is a bit bold, no ?
Here's the deal.....The media is 100% responsible for the money in politics.What if our media would be nice enough to allow decent politicians onto political debates, who have something legitimate to say, instead of accusing each other as the two party circus clowns have been doing for decades? do you think our establishment media could do that, or no chance?
Here's the deal.....The media is 100% responsible for the money in politics.What if our media would be nice enough to allow decent politicians onto political debates, who have something legitimate to say, instead of accusing each other as the two party circus clowns have been doing for decades? do you think our establishment media could do that, or no chance?
Why? Because the media corps require payment for their air time. So, political candidates must beg borrow and suck up to rich people and businesses for donations so they can run their shitty and annoying attack ads against each other.
One of two things need to occur before your dream becomes reality.
Free air time...Or...Make it SO expensive that no political candidate would bother to buy time.
Either way, the whole system sucks sideways.
pvsi.net - People versus Special Interests is precisely about that and it states so clearly, but I like the way you put itHere's the deal.....The media is 100% responsible for the money in politics.What if our media would be nice enough to allow decent politicians onto political debates, who have something legitimate to say, instead of accusing each other as the two party circus clowns have been doing for decades? do you think our establishment media could do that, or no chance?
Why? Because the media corps require payment for their air time. So, political candidates must beg borrow and suck up to rich people and businesses for donations so they can run their shitty and annoying attack ads against each other.
One of two things need to occur before your dream becomes reality.
Free air time...Or...Make it SO expensive that no political candidate would bother to buy time.
Either way, the whole system sucks sideways.
It has nothing to do with the media.
It has to do with apathetic voters too lazy to do the hard work necessary to bring about actual change.
Public financing, anyone? How else to break the Republicrat/Koch-Soros duopoly?
Other solutions seem to amount to telling everyone how they should be voting or bemoaning the level of education in the country. Probably both true, but ineffective as strategies.
What if our media would be nice enough to allow decent politicians onto political debates, who have something legitimate to say, instead of accusing each other as the two party circus clowns have been doing for decades? do you think our establishment media could do that, or no chance?
No such thing as a decent politician running for national office, there may have been some in the past but in today's political landscape decent people are at too much of a disadvantage to run with that pack of hyenas who attack decency like a limping antelope.
In the United States the people do not hate the higher classes of society, but are not favorably inclined towards them and carefully exclude them from the exercise of authority. They do not fear distinguished talents, but are rarely fond of them. In general, everyone who rises without their aid seldom obtains their favor.
While the natural instincts of democracy induce the people to reject distinguished citizens as their rulers, an instinct not less strong induces able men to retire from the political arena, in which it is so difficult to retain their independence, or to advance without becoming servile.
pvsi.net - People versus Special Interests is precisely about that and it states so clearly, but I like the way you put itHere's the deal.....The media is 100% responsible for the money in politics.What if our media would be nice enough to allow decent politicians onto political debates, who have something legitimate to say, instead of accusing each other as the two party circus clowns have been doing for decades? do you think our establishment media could do that, or no chance?
Why? Because the media corps require payment for their air time. So, political candidates must beg borrow and suck up to rich people and businesses for donations so they can run their shitty and annoying attack ads against each other.
One of two things need to occur before your dream becomes reality.
Free air time...Or...Make it SO expensive that no political candidate would bother to buy time.
Either way, the whole system sucks sideways.
Public financing, anyone? How else to break the Republicrat/Koch-Soros duopoly?
Other solutions seem to amount to telling everyone how they should be voting or bemoaning the level of education in the country. Probably both true, but ineffective as strategies.
The irony of Obama's win vs his policies is this: While black voters selected Obama at over 98%, it was white suburban moderates who put Obama over the top. It is those same suburbanites that Obama despises. Obama has a chip on his shoulder for these people and the idea of suburbs themselves. Like all new urbanist/ smart growth people Obama believes that people left cities due to racism and taxation.It has nothing to do with the media.
It has to do with apathetic voters too lazy to do the hard work necessary to bring about actual change.
they DID...they voted In Obama...and HOW well has that worked so far?
It has nothing to do with ‘the media.’
It has to do with apathetic voters too lazy to do the hard work necessary to bring about actual change.
You are a true definition of n asshole, show me a link where I said anything like that, and if it's the video, quote the text part and what mark.Are you still promoting capital punishment for candidates who promote themselves beyond your state media, commie?
