What if Global Warming is a Scam?

[westwall]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

I'm not taking a side either way. But to see the Koch brothers fund low ranked scientists to say "it's not a fact" vs the 95% of scientists who say it's a fact looks pretty shady. Note, the scientist that was against global warming didn't say it's a hoax, they stated there wasn't enough evidence to prove it. But that's politics.

If you want your party to win you have to agree with the stupid for the greater good, (R)ight?

The reality is it is a hoax. They have been unable in 30 years to present empirical data to support their theory. It's as simple as that. The only thing they have are computer models that have now been shown to be less accurate than flipping a coin.

Don't believe a word I say but look it up for yourself. There is loads of information out there for you to enjoy...and it's easy to find so I'll let you do it.

 

[mamooth]

All the deniers here just rave about politics. That says it all. They're political cultists, nothing more.

In direct contrast, the rational people talk about the science. That enrages the deniers, and gets them sputtering more about the great global socialist conspiracy.

And if someone is raving about conspiracies, the proper course of action is to smile and slowly back away.

 

[flacaltenn]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

I'm not taking a side either way. But to see the Koch brothers fund low ranked scientists to say "it's not a fact" vs the 95% of scientists who say it's a fact looks pretty shady. Note, the scientist that was against global warming didn't say it's a hoax, they stated there wasn't enough evidence to prove it. But that's politics.

If you want your party to win you have to agree with the stupid for the greater good, (R)ight?

I'm as "anti-party" as you are and I understand the corporate collusion that BOTH parties currently support for different constituents. But I am 100% certain, that the anti-GW insurgency is grassroots. And it doesn't take a massive amount of money to attack it.. It's handily dismantling itself.. As WestWall pointed out, anybody following the science can smell the desperation in light of both the scientific and political failures of AGW.

In fact -- something this important to a political agenda should NEVER have been entrusted to the UN... THAT was the major flaw in organization. It should have been kept as a National Academies production and more closely controlled so it didn't turn into a parade of 3rd world beggars looking for Global Redistribution...

 

[AntiParty]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

I'm not taking a side either way. But to see the Koch brothers fund low ranked scientists to say "it's not a fact" vs the 95% of scientists who say it's a fact looks pretty shady. Note, the scientist that was against global warming didn't say it's a hoax, they stated there wasn't enough evidence to prove it. But that's politics.

If you want your party to win you have to agree with the stupid for the greater good, (R)ight?

I'm as "anti-party" as you are and I understand the corporate collusion that BOTH parties currently support for different constituents. But I am 100% certain, that the anti-GW insurgency is grassroots. And it doesn't take a massive amount of money to attack it.. It's handily dismantling itself.. As WestWall pointed out, anybody following the science can smell the desperation in light of both the scientific and political failures of AGW.

In fact -- something this important to a political agenda should NEVER have been entrusted to the UN... THAT was the major flaw in organization. It should have been kept as a National Academies production and more closely controlled so it didn't turn into a parade of 3rd world beggars looking for Global Redistribution...

I'm glad you are smart enough to see the "corporate collusion of both parties", that's rare.

But when you attack science, you don't seem to understand science. Science is the most true language on the planet other than math.

You don't like that it's been brought up in the UN but you possibly haven't researched Weather Warfare. It's the newest way to take out Countries without being seen. All the Countries using these Low Frequency Waves could be destroying our planet.

It doesn't take "footprint vouchers" to save our planet. It takes an open mind willing to educate themselves beyond mainstream media. Yet MM held an entire documentary on this, [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNUavxHTtVY]Weather Warfare Documentary (History Channel) - YouTube[/ame] <--Makes it a UN ordeal. But as you stated, you don't rely or follow science............

 

[AntiParty]

Then a whole lot of people should go to prison for many many years

For what? Stating what they believe as a scientist or opinion? Did you think about that before you said it? Are you planning on sending, "The world is flat" people to prison?

Do you read before you right gibberish?

See the word SCAM in the OP?

Might want to check the dictionary before looking the fool

People go to prison for scams. We are talking about Corporations.

 

[Pogo]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

--- using exactly the same tactics, and many of the same people, that were trotted out to lead the denialism on the link between tobacco and cancer.

How'd that work out? I forget.

 

[flacaltenn]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

I'm not taking a side either way. But to see the Koch brothers fund low ranked scientists to say "it's not a fact" vs the 95% of scientists who say it's a fact looks pretty shady. Note, the scientist that was against global warming didn't say it's a hoax, they stated there wasn't enough evidence to prove it. But that's politics.

If you want your party to win you have to agree with the stupid for the greater good, (R)ight?

I'm as "anti-party" as you are and I understand the corporate collusion that BOTH parties currently support for different constituents. But I am 100% certain, that the anti-GW insurgency is grassroots. And it doesn't take a massive amount of money to attack it.. It's handily dismantling itself.. As WestWall pointed out, anybody following the science can smell the desperation in light of both the scientific and political failures of AGW.

In fact -- something this important to a political agenda should NEVER have been entrusted to the UN... THAT was the major flaw in organization. It should have been kept as a National Academies production and more closely controlled so it didn't turn into a parade of 3rd world beggars looking for Global Redistribution...

I'm glad you are smart enough to see the "corporate collusion of both parties", that's rare.

But when you attack science, you don't seem to understand science. Science is the most true language on the planet other than math.

You don't like that it's been brought up in the UN but you possibly haven't researched Weather Warfare. It's the newest way to take out Countries without being seen. All the Countries using these Low Frequency Waves could be destroying our planet.

It doesn't take "footprint vouchers" to save our planet. It takes an open mind willing to educate themselves beyond mainstream media. Yet MM held an entire documentary on this, [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNUavxHTtVY]Weather Warfare Documentary (History Channel) - YouTube[/ame] <--Makes it a UN ordeal. But as you stated, you don't rely or follow science............

I've got 20+ years in the science biz.. And I've invested heavily in understanding the GWarming debate.. The fact that I have QUESTIONS and are skeptical of the fairytale projections of GW doom --- doesn't mean that I am attacking science..

 

[AntiParty]

I'm as "anti-party" as you are and I understand the corporate collusion that BOTH parties currently support for different constituents. But I am 100% certain, that the anti-GW insurgency is grassroots. And it doesn't take a massive amount of money to attack it.. It's handily dismantling itself.. As WestWall pointed out, anybody following the science can smell the desperation in light of both the scientific and political failures of AGW.

In fact -- something this important to a political agenda should NEVER have been entrusted to the UN... THAT was the major flaw in organization. It should have been kept as a National Academies production and more closely controlled so it didn't turn into a parade of 3rd world beggars looking for Global Redistribution...

I'm glad you are smart enough to see the "corporate collusion of both parties", that's rare.

But when you attack science, you don't seem to understand science. Science is the most true language on the planet other than math.

You don't like that it's been brought up in the UN but you possibly haven't researched Weather Warfare. It's the newest way to take out Countries without being seen. All the Countries using these Low Frequency Waves could be destroying our planet.

It doesn't take "footprint vouchers" to save our planet. It takes an open mind willing to educate themselves beyond mainstream media. Yet MM held an entire documentary on this, [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNUavxHTtVY]Weather Warfare Documentary (History Channel) - YouTube[/ame] <--Makes it a UN ordeal. But as you stated, you don't rely or follow science............

I've got 20+ years in the science biz.. And I've invested heavily in understanding the GWarming debate.. The fact that I have QUESTIONS and are skeptical of the fairytale projections of GW doom --- doesn't mean that I am attacking science..

No scientist ever attacked questions. You solidify my point. (Except you call it a "biz")

 

[AntiParty]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

--- using exactly the same tactics, and many of the same people, that were trotted out to lead the denialism on the link between tobacco and cancer.

How'd that work out? I forget.

The doctors smoked "Camels". Doctors are part of the 1% for a reason.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-2oQOIXKuY]Doctors Smoking in the 50's - YouTube[/ame]

 

[AntiParty]

Wonder how many Americans could have had FREE health care with the money wasted by the Manchurian muslim on this PONZI SCAM, that put millions BACK into the DNC's pocket through DONATIONS by these failed companies??? Waiting for the Moonbats spin on this! This list is only through Julty2012!

Below is a list of energy companies backed by President Barack Obama and funded by the American people that have failed. President Obama has wasted tax payer money on these companies and he wants you to re-elect him so he can give you more of the same.
Being the ideologue that he is, he WONT back down from funding more fake (meaning they have never proven themselves profitable or actually have made a product that works)

.Solar Trust of America: FAIL - Filed Bankruptcy in Oakland, CA, April 3, 2012 – On April 2, 2012

Bright Source: FAIL - Bright Source warned Obama’s Energy Department officials in March 2011 that delays in approving a $1.6 billion U.S. loan guarantee would embarrass the White House and force the solar-energy company to close. Lost Billions of dollars but Getting More Money To Keep Trying. Can you say, “This isnt working?”

Solyndra: FAIL - Obama gave Solyndra $500,000,000 in taxpayer money and Solyndra shut its doors and laid off 1100 workers in August 2011 After Billions in Losses due to failure to make a solar product that works!

LSP Energy: FAIL - LSPEnergy LP filed bankruptcy protection and a sale of its assets in Feb 2012

Energy Conversion Devices: FAIL – On February 14, 2012 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. and its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy



Abound Solar: FAIL - Abound Solar received a $400 million loan guarantee from Barack Obama announced in June, 2012 that it would file for bankruptcy

SunPower: FAIL – SunPower stopped producing solar cells last year at near bankruptcy restructured only with help of, get this, oil giant TOTAL who owns 60% stake. Irony! Still

Beacon Power: FAIL – Beacon Power Corp filed for bankruptcy Oct 2011 just a year after Obama approved $43 million loan Government loan guarantee

Ecotality: FAIL - ECOtality, a San Francisco green-tech company that never earned any money on the verge of bankruptcy after receiving roughly $115 million in two loan guarantees from Obama

A123 Solar: FAIL-A123 received $279 million from taxpayers thanks to President Obama’sDepartment of Energy loan guarantees and after Solyndra bankruptcy is getting another $500M from Obama and it has lost $400M

UniSolar: FAIL - Uni-Solar filed for Ch 11 bankruptcy in June 20 this year laid off hundreds got more Obama money still failing but still in business

Azure Dynamics: FAIL - Azure Dynamics files for bankruptcy in June ter millions in Obama “Stimulus”

Evergreen Solar: FAIL - Evergreen Solar received $527 Million in Taxpayer money from Obama filed bankruptcy

Ener1: FAIL received more than $100 million in government funding from the Obama administration filed for bankruptcy January 2012

Update: In May 2012 Obama visited a dusty, desert town 30 miles outside Las Vegas Wednesday to declare he’s doubling down on failed federal efforts to boost the solar industry which has NEVER proven to produce a single working product. Like Socialism, no evidence ot works, but they just keep doubling down on the failed ideals!.

Anyone care to add more to this list, please do!

I notice that you state Obama backed these which I'm not bored enough to solidify but note that they Fail during Obama's presidency.

I have to wonder if this is just another thread like national debt.

Obama has the smallest growth spending of any president since the 50's but is blamed today for all national debt.

It's time for America to stop blaming 1 person for our history. It's uneducated.

 

[westwall]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

I'm not taking a side either way. But to see the Koch brothers fund low ranked scientists to say "it's not a fact" vs the 95% of scientists who say it's a fact looks pretty shady. Note, the scientist that was against global warming didn't say it's a hoax, they stated there wasn't enough evidence to prove it. But that's politics.

If you want your party to win you have to agree with the stupid for the greater good, (R)ight?

I'm as "anti-party" as you are and I understand the corporate collusion that BOTH parties currently support for different constituents. But I am 100% certain, that the anti-GW insurgency is grassroots. And it doesn't take a massive amount of money to attack it.. It's handily dismantling itself.. As WestWall pointed out, anybody following the science can smell the desperation in light of both the scientific and political failures of AGW.

In fact -- something this important to a political agenda should NEVER have been entrusted to the UN... THAT was the major flaw in organization. It should have been kept as a National Academies production and more closely controlled so it didn't turn into a parade of 3rd world beggars looking for Global Redistribution...

I'm glad you are smart enough to see the "corporate collusion of both parties", that's rare.

But when you attack science, you don't seem to understand science. Science is the most true language on the planet other than math.

You don't like that it's been brought up in the UN but you possibly haven't researched Weather Warfare. It's the newest way to take out Countries without being seen. All the Countries using these Low Frequency Waves could be destroying our planet.

It doesn't take "footprint vouchers" to save our planet. It takes an open mind willing to educate themselves beyond mainstream media. Yet MM held an entire documentary on this, [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNUavxHTtVY]Weather Warfare Documentary (History Channel) - YouTube[/ame] <--Makes it a UN ordeal. But as you stated, you don't rely or follow science............

Wrong. The climatologists entire theory is based on computer models. there is no empirical data at all. They have violated the scientific method at every turn. The scientific method requires you to make a prediction about how your theory will behave in the real world. GW supporters claim that global warming will cause both more snow and less snow. More rain and less rain.

That makes the hypothesis untestable. Look up what the definition of an untestable hypothesis is then get back to us.

 

[westwall]

Great post.

If anyone out there that believes global warming is a hoax had a brain they might wonder where all the funding to make people believe so is coming from. If it's simply a hoax, spreading facts is free.

I dare any "hoax" moron to look up the amount of money spent by Corporations to influential people to state, "It's not a fact"

--- using exactly the same tactics, and many of the same people, that were trotted out to lead the denialism on the link between tobacco and cancer.

How'd that work out? I forget.

The doctors smoked "Camels". Doctors are part of the 1% for a reason.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-2oQOIXKuY]Doctors Smoking in the 50's - YouTube[/ame]

Non sequitur equals logic fail. The fact remains that before smoking was actually STUDIED, it was deemed to be OK. Back in the days of the apothecary, they tasted everything...including osmium...the number two most toxic substance on the heavy metal hit parade.

As man's knowledge has increased so too has the awareness that what was once deemed safe actually isn't. The simple fact remains that the global warming scam is perpetrated by lazy and poor scientists who have made millions off of the scam, and they have been aided and abetted by the progressive political parties because those parties WANT control of what you do.

For someone who proclaims themselves anti-party, you are towing the party line extremely well.

 

[westwall]

Wonder how many Americans could have had FREE health care with the money wasted by the Manchurian muslim on this PONZI SCAM, that put millions BACK into the DNC's pocket through DONATIONS by these failed companies??? Waiting for the Moonbats spin on this! This list is only through Julty2012!

Below is a list of energy companies backed by President Barack Obama and funded by the American people that have failed. President Obama has wasted tax payer money on these companies and he wants you to re-elect him so he can give you more of the same.
Being the ideologue that he is, he WONT back down from funding more fake (meaning they have never proven themselves profitable or actually have made a product that works)

.Solar Trust of America: FAIL - Filed Bankruptcy in Oakland, CA, April 3, 2012 – On April 2, 2012

Bright Source: FAIL - Bright Source warned Obama’s Energy Department officials in March 2011 that delays in approving a $1.6 billion U.S. loan guarantee would embarrass the White House and force the solar-energy company to close. Lost Billions of dollars but Getting More Money To Keep Trying. Can you say, “This isnt working?”

Solyndra: FAIL - Obama gave Solyndra $500,000,000 in taxpayer money and Solyndra shut its doors and laid off 1100 workers in August 2011 After Billions in Losses due to failure to make a solar product that works!

LSP Energy: FAIL - LSPEnergy LP filed bankruptcy protection and a sale of its assets in Feb 2012

Energy Conversion Devices: FAIL – On February 14, 2012 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. and its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy



Abound Solar: FAIL - Abound Solar received a $400 million loan guarantee from Barack Obama announced in June, 2012 that it would file for bankruptcy

SunPower: FAIL – SunPower stopped producing solar cells last year at near bankruptcy restructured only with help of, get this, oil giant TOTAL who owns 60% stake. Irony! Still

Beacon Power: FAIL – Beacon Power Corp filed for bankruptcy Oct 2011 just a year after Obama approved $43 million loan Government loan guarantee

Ecotality: FAIL - ECOtality, a San Francisco green-tech company that never earned any money on the verge of bankruptcy after receiving roughly $115 million in two loan guarantees from Obama

A123 Solar: FAIL-A123 received $279 million from taxpayers thanks to President Obama’sDepartment of Energy loan guarantees and after Solyndra bankruptcy is getting another $500M from Obama and it has lost $400M

UniSolar: FAIL - Uni-Solar filed for Ch 11 bankruptcy in June 20 this year laid off hundreds got more Obama money still failing but still in business

Azure Dynamics: FAIL - Azure Dynamics files for bankruptcy in June ter millions in Obama “Stimulus”

Evergreen Solar: FAIL - Evergreen Solar received $527 Million in Taxpayer money from Obama filed bankruptcy

Ener1: FAIL received more than $100 million in government funding from the Obama administration filed for bankruptcy January 2012

Update: In May 2012 Obama visited a dusty, desert town 30 miles outside Las Vegas Wednesday to declare he’s doubling down on failed federal efforts to boost the solar industry which has NEVER proven to produce a single working product. Like Socialism, no evidence ot works, but they just keep doubling down on the failed ideals!.

Anyone care to add more to this list, please do!

I notice that you state Obama backed these which I'm not bored enough to solidify but note that they Fail during Obama's presidency.

I have to wonder if this is just another thread like national debt.

Obama has the smallest growth spending of any president since the 50's but is blamed today for all national debt.

It's time for America to stop blaming 1 person for our history. It's uneducated.

OK, you have just exposed yourself as a progressive shill. You are simply not credible.

 

[Pop23]

For what? Stating what they believe as a scientist or opinion? Did you think about that before you said it? Are you planning on sending, "The world is flat" people to prison?

Do you read before you right gibberish?

See the word SCAM in the OP?

Might want to check the dictionary before looking the fool

People go to prison for scams. We are talking about Corporations.

For the uneducated:

Bernie Madoff

Get it?

Oh genius, where in the OP are corporations mentioned?

You trying to hijack the thread to go after corporations?

 

[AntiParty]

I'm as "anti-party" as you are and I understand the corporate collusion that BOTH parties currently support for different constituents. But I am 100% certain, that the anti-GW insurgency is grassroots. And it doesn't take a massive amount of money to attack it.. It's handily dismantling itself.. As WestWall pointed out, anybody following the science can smell the desperation in light of both the scientific and political failures of AGW.

In fact -- something this important to a political agenda should NEVER have been entrusted to the UN... THAT was the major flaw in organization. It should have been kept as a National Academies production and more closely controlled so it didn't turn into a parade of 3rd world beggars looking for Global Redistribution...

I'm glad you are smart enough to see the "corporate collusion of both parties", that's rare.

But when you attack science, you don't seem to understand science. Science is the most true language on the planet other than math.

You don't like that it's been brought up in the UN but you possibly haven't researched Weather Warfare. It's the newest way to take out Countries without being seen. All the Countries using these Low Frequency Waves could be destroying our planet.

It doesn't take "footprint vouchers" to save our planet. It takes an open mind willing to educate themselves beyond mainstream media. Yet MM held an entire documentary on this, [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNUavxHTtVY]Weather Warfare Documentary (History Channel) - YouTube[/ame] <--Makes it a UN ordeal. But as you stated, you don't rely or follow science............

Wrong. The climatologists entire theory is based on computer models. there is no empirical data at all. They have violated the scientific method at every turn. The scientific method requires you to make a prediction about how your theory will behave in the real world. GW supporters claim that global warming will cause both more snow and less snow. More rain and less rain.

That makes the hypothesis untestable. Look up what the definition of an untestable hypothesis is then get back to us.

So you don't consider "more rain or less rain" extreme climate changes? You think that it just has to ran a lot or droubt a lot to be an extreme climate change?

You should really research the topic before talking bout it. Excuse me, research it beyond Fox News.

 

[AntiParty]

Do you read before you right gibberish?

See the word SCAM in the OP?

Might want to check the dictionary before looking the fool

People go to prison for scams. We are talking about Corporations.

For the uneducated:

Bernie Madoff

Get it?

Oh genius, where in the OP are corporations mentioned?

You trying to hijack the thread to go after corporations?

You didn't quote me on my response to the OP. You quoted me on my response to someone who was talking about Corporations and other things. Try to keep up with the conversation drunkard.

 

[Pop23]

People go to prison for scams. We are talking about Corporations.

For the uneducated:

Bernie Madoff

Get it?

Oh genius, where in the OP are corporations mentioned?

You trying to hijack the thread to go after corporations?

You didn't quote me on my response to the OP. You quoted me on my response to someone who was talking about Corporations and other things. Try to keep up with the conversation drunkard.

You really should smoke less pot.

This whole thing started by you quoting me, not the other way around.

Now off to bed with ya, way past your bedtime.

 

[flacaltenn]

I'm glad you are smart enough to see the "corporate collusion of both parties", that's rare.

But when you attack science, you don't seem to understand science. Science is the most true language on the planet other than math.

You don't like that it's been brought up in the UN but you possibly haven't researched Weather Warfare. It's the newest way to take out Countries without being seen. All the Countries using these Low Frequency Waves could be destroying our planet.

It doesn't take "footprint vouchers" to save our planet. It takes an open mind willing to educate themselves beyond mainstream media. Yet MM held an entire documentary on this, Weather Warfare Documentary (History Channel) - YouTube <--Makes it a UN ordeal. But as you stated, you don't rely or follow science............

Wrong. The climatologists entire theory is based on computer models. there is no empirical data at all. They have violated the scientific method at every turn. The scientific method requires you to make a prediction about how your theory will behave in the real world. GW supporters claim that global warming will cause both more snow and less snow. More rain and less rain.

That makes the hypothesis untestable. Look up what the definition of an untestable hypothesis is then get back to us.

So you don't consider "more rain or less rain" extreme climate changes? You think that it just has to ran a lot or droubt a lot to be an extreme climate change?

You should really research the topic before talking bout it. Excuse me, research it beyond Fox News.

Of course "more rain or less rain" is NOT a valid projection.. It's a self-cancelling logical statement. Just like "a higher Dow avg or a lower Dow avg".. You could argue that natural weathers will STALL out and create intense LOCAL effects, but that's not the same statement. Besides, it's based on a 0.5degC change in warming.. Do you think that 0.5degC matters to your average tornado producing super cell thunderstorm? HOW MANY factors have to come together to create a tornado or a hurricane?? Forecasting WEATHER by TEMPERATURE alone is an excersize for fools.. Especially when the temperature increase is said to be GLOBAL and evenly distributed upon the surface and extends into the weather making portion of the atmosphere..

 

[westwall]

I'm glad you are smart enough to see the "corporate collusion of both parties", that's rare.

But when you attack science, you don't seem to understand science. Science is the most true language on the planet other than math.

You don't like that it's been brought up in the UN but you possibly haven't researched Weather Warfare. It's the newest way to take out Countries without being seen. All the Countries using these Low Frequency Waves could be destroying our planet.

It doesn't take "footprint vouchers" to save our planet. It takes an open mind willing to educate themselves beyond mainstream media. Yet MM held an entire documentary on this, Weather Warfare Documentary (History Channel) - YouTube <--Makes it a UN ordeal. But as you stated, you don't rely or follow science............

Wrong. The climatologists entire theory is based on computer models. there is no empirical data at all. They have violated the scientific method at every turn. The scientific method requires you to make a prediction about how your theory will behave in the real world. GW supporters claim that global warming will cause both more snow and less snow. More rain and less rain.

That makes the hypothesis untestable. Look up what the definition of an untestable hypothesis is then get back to us.

So you don't consider "more rain or less rain" extreme climate changes? You think that it just has to ran a lot or droubt a lot to be an extreme climate change?

You should really research the topic before talking bout it. Excuse me, research it beyond Fox News.

I earned a PhD in geology from Caltech long before you were born junior. The reality is in science you get to make ONE claim. You don't get to say it will do more AND less. That is a fundamental violation of the scientific method. Look that up sometime.

Looks like it's time for you to learn the basics.

 

[Uncensored2008]

What if it isn't a scam?

What if fire is cold?