Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by red states rule, Jun 7, 2007.
This is a classic.
D-Day: Crisis On Omaha
imagine that...another day, another cut and paste link to someone else's original thoughts and ideas from the neocon newsbot.
Given how the was over 7 mimutes - you did not watch it
If D Day was to happen today - how would the liberal media report it?
"Invasion Fails - Nazi's Still In Power"
"Thousands of Troops and Innocent Civilians Killed in Bloody Invasion"
as I have told you on numerous occasions, I am precluded from watching streaming video by the firewall of the WAN that I use at work.
Again.... you post links and cut and pastes and never write anything of your own beyond a sentence of two...and those sentences all follow the same form of "libs/dems do BLANK" or "libs/dems are BLANK"
You prove yourself to be an intellectual lightweight every day... but one has to laugh at your continued ability to proclaim victory in debate after debate while lying in the gutter after having been routinely kicked to the curb.
Oh, posting on the boss's time - great way to keep the Bush economy growing
well...since you have no idea as to the nature of my job or my hours or my compensation arrangements, I guess you really can't make that statement, can you?
Yep, usual ploy, attack the messenger not the message. I have ask before of several of people.... why is it if one posts links they are condemned for it and if one DOESN'T post links they are condemned for it, by the same people?
Were is the OUTRAGE at Truthmatters? Not only does he post a shitload of links he pads his post count by answering his own posts and almost always is wrong in his conclusions of what he DOES use his own words for. He is incapable of the simple act of posting a link and typing in the same post.
where is the rage at truthmatters? I would suggest you need look no further than your own writing for that. I am curious as to why you feel that liberals need to call liberals on the carpet when plenty of conservatives do that quite well and quite often. Why is MY credibility somehow diminished by the fact that I don't pile on any and all liberals who make outlandish claims? I am here to debate conservatives, not police liberals. You don't see me running to truthmatters' defense, do you? Like YOU do routinely for RSR?
I condemn RSR for his complete reliance on the writings of others and then his complete refusal to ever stand and do "battle" - his words against my words. I cannot recall a time when I have ever complained about RSR NOT providing a link, since basically, that is all he does.
We have had this discussion. Your silence IS support. And you have admitted as much. Using as a defense that the far left has no power, which is not supported by the facts.
Simple way to get me to quit pointing out your hypocrasy... ADMIT that the ONLY reason you attack Red State Rules methods and not the IDENTICAL methods of Truthmatters is that RSR is not Liberal and doesn't vote dem.
The CNN news lead would have been: Invasion of Choice Causes Wehrmacht Bombings.
Separate names with a comma.