Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is a "Reaffirmation Act" in response to the debacles in Colorado and New Mexico.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
It is a "Reaffirmation Act" in response to the debacles in Colorado and New Mexico.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
In both cases the businesses were found to be owned by Christians and targeted for that reason only.
These reaffirmation laws prevent your side from targeting( discriminating against) certain business owners.
How about getting rid of those stupid laws on every level and letting people alone?It is a "Reaffirmation Act" in response to the debacles in Colorado and New Mexico.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
In both cases the businesses were found to be owned by Christians and targeted for that reason only.
These reaffirmation laws prevent your side from targeting( discriminating against) certain business owners.
It changed nothing. The States of Co and NM brought cases against those businesses because the broke the law by discriminating. If Indiana were to add LGBT's to their protected persons then Indiana could very well do the same. Or if the law is modified on a national level (lol).
There were no "cases"....The baker in Colorado was fined an absurd almost unconscionable amount ($15K).It is a "Reaffirmation Act" in response to the debacles in Colorado and New Mexico.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
In both cases the businesses were found to be owned by Christians and targeted for that reason only.
These reaffirmation laws prevent your side from targeting( discriminating against) certain business owners.
It changed nothing. The States of Co and NM brought cases against those businesses because the broke the law by discriminating. If Indiana were to add LGBT's to their protected persons then Indiana could very well do the same. Or if the law is modified on a national level (lol).
e
You don't have unlimited rights to practice what you call religion.
If a baker can not refuse to bake a cake for a ss wedding based on their religious convictions, can a priest refuse to perform a ss wedding based on their religious convictions?
Still waiting for an answer.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.Do you see political affiliation on the list.
If some dumb-ass wants to thread that needle when refusing service to gays let them take it to court and let the coiurts decide.
Hmmm.. I don't know if that will stop the fag militia.If a baker can not refuse to bake a cake for a ss wedding based on their religious convictions, can a priest refuse to perform a ss wedding based on their religious convictions?
Yes because a church is not covered under applicable public accommodation laws.
Still waiting for an answer.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.Do you see political affiliation on the list.
If some dumb-ass wants to thread that needle when refusing service to gays let them take it to court and let the coiurts decide.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Still waiting for an answer.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.Do you see political affiliation on the list.
If some dumb-ass wants to thread that needle when refusing service to gays let them take it to court and let the coiurts decide.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Still waiting for an answer.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.Do you see political affiliation on the list.
If some dumb-ass wants to thread that needle when refusing service to gays let them take it to court and let the coiurts decide.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
OK.... and....I've posted Indiana's law on protected groups. No political parties are listed. On the federal level political parties and not listed either.-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Still waiting for an answer.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.Do you see political affiliation on the list.
If some dumb-ass wants to thread that needle when refusing service to gays let them take it to court and let the coiurts decide.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
There is no law which determines which groups you libs choose to set up as special classes.-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Still waiting for an answer.Oh please...Then why all the hullaballoo?
If its nothing, then...?...
Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.Do you see political affiliation on the list.
If some dumb-ass wants to thread that needle when refusing service to gays let them take it to court and let the coiurts decide.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
I've posted Indiana's law on protected groups. No political parties are listed. On the federal level political parties and not listed either.
There is no law which determines which groups you libs choose to set up as special classes.-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Still waiting for an answer.Here is Indiana's PA law.
It is against the law for an individual to be denied access or to receive poor service or lesser quality accommodations because of his or her race, color, national origin, ancestrny, religion, sex, familial status (having children under 18) and disablility in any of the following:
ICRC Public Accommodation
Why the need for the new law at all? I think it was they wanted to feed their base but then got jumped by the opportunist on the other side.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.Do you see political affiliation on the list.
If some dumb-ass wants to thread that needle when refusing service to gays let them take it to court and let the coiurts decide.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
I've posted Indiana's law on protected groups. No political parties are listed. On the federal level political parties and not listed either.
Oh? Please post any info you may have on these laws which specifically mention special protected classes....There is no law which determines which groups you libs choose to set up as special classes.-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Still waiting for an answer.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
I've posted Indiana's law on protected groups. No political parties are listed. On the federal level political parties and not listed either.
Except that there is.
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate laws against discrimination?Except that there is.There is no law which determines which groups you libs choose to set up as special classes.-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Still waiting for an answer.
What's there for a court to decide? According to you, political beliefs are not protected by anti-discrimination law.
Period.
The End.
Why do you refuse to stand by your position and agree that a a baker who refuses to serve people who support gay marriage does not violate laws against discrimination?
Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
I've posted Indiana's law on protected groups. No political parties are listed. On the federal level political parties and not listed either.
Oh? Please post any info you may have on these laws which specifically mention special protected classes....There is no law which determines which groups you libs choose to set up as special classes.-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.Obviously, a gay couple intending to get married support gay marriage and a baker in business selling wedding cakes certain states cannot refuse to make them a wedding cake. Does that help?
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
I've posted Indiana's law on protected groups. No political parties are listed. On the federal level political parties and not listed either.
Except that there is.
Ugh.....Protected classes are not a matter of law. They are created by liberals and supported by liberal politicians.Oh? Please post any info you may have on these laws which specifically mention special protected classes....There is no law which determines which groups you libs choose to set up as special classes.-You- said that political positions were not protected by discrimination laws.
How does refusing to serve someone because of their political belief that gays should be allow to marry violate those laws?
I've posted Indiana's law on protected groups. No political parties are listed. On the federal level political parties and not listed either.
Except that there is.
What Are The Protected Classes Under Discrimination Laws - Attorneys.com
