Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
67% of refugees referred to the US by the UN are children under the age of 12 and women.The vast majority are children under the age of 14, women, and older men. A male, 20 - 30 years of age, is an obvious red flag in the screening process and most have not made it through.Here are the leading causes of death in the US:
ISIS didn't make the list.
Neither did Muslims.
Neither did Ebola.
Neither did Obama.
In fact, you are way, way, way more likely to be shot to death by someone you know than to be killed by ISIS.
So...yeah. Hysterical fear. Yes. Definitely.
So should we just open our borders and let in every radical who has declared Jihad on the USA?
Nope. But we should let in the refugees who are seeking protection from those radical jihadists.
Why does this not penetrate your thick skull?
Why?
The people who died on 9/11 and in Paris might take issue with your attitude, if they were still here.
Only if they were as retarded as you are. I think most of them would know there is a huge difference between a jihadist and a refugee, unlike you.
the problem is that no one can tell them apart. BTW, where are the women and children and old people in the so-called refugees? Why are the vast majority of them men in their 20s and 30s?
You're obviously an idiot because 62% of the so-called "refugees" are males of military age.
False! there at least 2 posts that debunk that bullshit.The vast majority are children under the age of 14, women, and older men. A male, 20 - 30 years of age, is an obvious red flag in the screening process and most have not made it through.Here are the leading causes of death in the US:
ISIS didn't make the list.
Neither did Muslims.
Neither did Ebola.
Neither did Obama.
In fact, you are way, way, way more likely to be shot to death by someone you know than to be killed by ISIS.
So...yeah. Hysterical fear. Yes. Definitely.
So should we just open our borders and let in every radical who has declared Jihad on the USA?
Nope. But we should let in the refugees who are seeking protection from those radical jihadists.
Why does this not penetrate your thick skull?
Why?
The people who died on 9/11 and in Paris might take issue with your attitude, if they were still here.
Only if they were as retarded as you are. I think most of them would know there is a huge difference between a jihadist and a refugee, unlike you.
the problem is that no one can tell them apart. BTW, where are the women and children and old people in the so-called refugees? Why are the vast majority of them men in their 20s and 30s?
You're obviously an idiot because 62% of the so-called "refugees" are males of military age.
False! there at least 2 posts that debunk that bullshit.The vast majority are children under the age of 14, women, and older men. A male, 20 - 30 years of age, is an obvious red flag in the screening process and most have not made it through.So should we just open our borders and let in every radical who has declared Jihad on the USA?
Nope. But we should let in the refugees who are seeking protection from those radical jihadists.
Why does this not penetrate your thick skull?
Why?
The people who died on 9/11 and in Paris might take issue with your attitude, if they were still here.
Only if they were as retarded as you are. I think most of them would know there is a huge difference between a jihadist and a refugee, unlike you.
the problem is that no one can tell them apart. BTW, where are the women and children and old people in the so-called refugees? Why are the vast majority of them men in their 20s and 30s?
You're obviously an idiot because 62% of the so-called "refugees" are males of military age.
"The origin of the Republicans' claim is a statistic showing that 62% of immigrants and refugees who arrived in the EU by sea during 2015 were male. That is true, but the statistic does not claim that 62% are "military-age," just that they are male, so that includes children and older men as well. And, of course, 62% is not 72%. Also, that is not a statistic about Syrian refugees. That statistic is about all immigrants arriving by sea. Half of the immigrants were from other countries. Over the summer, large numbers of migrants from Africa attempted to enter the EU by crossing the Mediterranean. The migration from Africa was major news culminating in the horrible capsizing of a Portuguese merchant vessel in which over 800 migrants died. The reason that slightly more (62%) than half of the migrants arriving in the EU by boat were male is presumably related to a slightly highly willingness to risk the dangerous journey from Africa in overloaded and low quality boats, not anything to do with Syria.False! there at least 2 posts that debunk that bullshit.The vast majority are children under the age of 14, women, and older men. A male, 20 - 30 years of age, is an obvious red flag in the screening process and most have not made it through.Nope. But we should let in the refugees who are seeking protection from those radical jihadists.
Why does this not penetrate your thick skull?
Why?
Only if they were as retarded as you are. I think most of them would know there is a huge difference between a jihadist and a refugee, unlike you.
the problem is that no one can tell them apart. BTW, where are the women and children and old people in the so-called refugees? Why are the vast majority of them men in their 20s and 30s?
You're obviously an idiot because 62% of the so-called "refugees" are males of military age.
I haven't seen anyone debunk it.
because you have not looked, even if you did you'd scream it's a lie or some other shit to avoid admitting you were talking out your ass.False! there at least 2 posts that debunk that bullshit.The vast majority are children under the age of 14, women, and older men. A male, 20 - 30 years of age, is an obvious red flag in the screening process and most have not made it through.Nope. But we should let in the refugees who are seeking protection from those radical jihadists.
Why does this not penetrate your thick skull?
Why?
Only if they were as retarded as you are. I think most of them would know there is a huge difference between a jihadist and a refugee, unlike you.
the problem is that no one can tell them apart. BTW, where are the women and children and old people in the so-called refugees? Why are the vast majority of them men in their 20s and 30s?
You're obviously an idiot because 62% of the so-called "refugees" are males of military age.
I haven't seen anyone debunk it.
because you have not looked, even if you did you'd scream it's a lie or some other shit to avoid admitting you were talking out your ass.False! there at least 2 posts that debunk that bullshit.The vast majority are children under the age of 14, women, and older men. A male, 20 - 30 years of age, is an obvious red flag in the screening process and most have not made it through.the problem is that no one can tell them apart. BTW, where are the women and children and old people in the so-called refugees? Why are the vast majority of them men in their 20s and 30s?
You're obviously an idiot because 62% of the so-called "refugees" are males of military age.
I haven't seen anyone debunk it.
,
wrong al you have to do is read the thread .because you have not looked, even if you did you'd scream it's a lie or some other shit to avoid admitting you were talking out your ass.False! there at least 2 posts that debunk that bullshit.The vast majority are children under the age of 14, women, and older men. A male, 20 - 30 years of age, is an obvious red flag in the screening process and most have not made it through.
You're obviously an idiot because 62% of the so-called "refugees" are males of military age.
I haven't seen anyone debunk it.
,
Why would I bother looking for your evidence? You don't seem to understand how a debate works.
As opposed to someone named Redfish on the internet. I'll take Mr. Milbank, the Post, and Time with an unnamed quote in every instance.LOL, from the Washington post and "senior administration officials". and you are so fricken naïve that you believe it. sad, truly sad.
its a free country, you can believe whatever you want. I really don't give a shit what you believe. your opinions have no value or credence, but I support your right to state them.
But....but I thought it was 'fricken naive' to quote unnamed sources. And yet you do it regularly.
What happened to your mantra of 'prove them wrong' when we asked you to back the drivel spewed by some random WordPress blog post you cited?
Sigh......'fricken naive' indeed.
everyone on this silly message board is posting their opinions. Anyone can find a cite to support their opinions, so claiming that one is valid and another is not is bullshit.
And it was citing unnamed sources that you found 'fricken naive'. Yet you do exactly that. And with sources far less credible than the Washington Post: random WordPress blogs.
And yet when asked to back the narrative you presented from the blog with actual evidence, you shriek "prove its wrong!!". Wouldn't that standard apply just as fully to the 'senior administration officials'?
Or do your standards not apply to you?
Klansmen were and are extreme right wing. Always have been, always will be.rationalize this much over what you had for dinner too?bullshit! if Christians don't believe in murder why the fuck do they do so much of it?Christians do not believe in murder, neither do conservatives. The KKK was neither Christian or conservative. nor was it liberal, but it was made up primarily of democrats.
spin that however you like. David Duke was not a Christian or a conservative. He was, and is, a white racist Nazi. He represents no one but himself and a tiny minority of idiots.
the they are not real Christians ploy will not wash .they are just as Christian from there pov than any other.
stop rationalizing .
Other than the crusades, when have Christians killed in the name of Christianity?
Do you know anything about the crusades? Do you know why Christian Europe decided to rid the world of Islam? Do you know how much territory and how many millions the muslims killed before stopped by the crusadrers?
like all libs, you rant and rave from ignorance. you are quite pathetic.
Which of the world wars was waged in the name of Jesus?
When did a murderer ever scream "praise Jesus" before blowing himself up and killing innocents?
What I said was true, no rationalization needed.
David Duke lived about two miles from me and worked out at the same health club that I belong to. He was, and is, an asshole. He is as far right as anyone could possibly be.
What I said about the KKK of the past being made up of mostly democrats is true, and it was during that time that the KKK lynched and burned. Today's KKK is a bunch of idiot rednecks who are too stupid to even know how stupid they are.
I know you lefties want to tie the conservative movement to the KKK, but it won't work.
A simple fact of life you can't swallow.
Another fact you can't swallow is that the Democratic party once had a lot of right wing conservatives in it. Especially in the South.
In fact, that is exactly why JFK was visiting Dallas on November 22, 1963. The right wing members of the Democratic party were going to cost him the 1964 re-election, and he was there to woo them.
ISIS has learned our pants shitters are fucking terrified of them. ISIS has learned they only need to kill a few Westerners and we curl up in the fetal position.
This is pathetic.
ok! you be the first to volunteerISIS has learned our pants shitters are fucking terrified of them. ISIS has learned they only need to kill a few Westerners and we curl up in the fetal position.
This is pathetic.
the solution is easy. blow them all into tiny pieces. Putin and Hollande and the king of Jordan understand this, obozo and you libtards never will.
ok! you be the first to volunteerISIS has learned our pants shitters are fucking terrified of them. ISIS has learned they only need to kill a few Westerners and we curl up in the fetal position.
This is pathetic.
the solution is easy. blow them all into tiny pieces. Putin and Hollande and the king of Jordan understand this, obozo and you libtards never will.
We have done more than France and Jordan and your hero Putin have done combined, useful idiot.ISIS has learned our pants shitters are fucking terrified of them. ISIS has learned they only need to kill a few Westerners and we curl up in the fetal position.
This is pathetic.
the solution is easy. blow them all into tiny pieces. Putin and Hollande and the king of Jordan understand this, obozo and you libtards never will.
Just as I thought you're a chicken shit .ok! you be the first to volunteerISIS has learned our pants shitters are fucking terrified of them. ISIS has learned they only need to kill a few Westerners and we curl up in the fetal position.
This is pathetic.
the solution is easy. blow them all into tiny pieces. Putin and Hollande and the king of Jordan understand this, obozo and you libtards never will.
We have a volunteer military. They are ready and able to eliminate ISIS if only obozo would let them do it.
