What ELSE happened to cause the firstThanksgiving?

What the Pilgrims tried to practice, took place before the name "socialism" was coined. But it had all the important characteristics of it, and it failed as miserably as socialism usually fails, with half the people dying of exposure and starvation while they couldn't must enough interest in working hard, to fend off the effects of a rough winter.

When the governor took drastic action and threw out the socialistic practices, instituting capitalism, personal responsibility, and private charity in its place, the colony then blossomed, producing far more food, shelter, etc. than it had with twice the workers under their previous form of socialism.

The resident socialists and other liberal fanatics don't dare question these facts, but continue to try to pretend they didn't matter.

(So did the original Pilgrims, which resulted in a great many deaths. Apparently liberals just can't acknowledge reality, even when it kills them)

[SNIP]..."The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century... The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs. A group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community.".......
a group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community. "After eleven years, about forty of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World, where they would certainly face hardships, but could live and worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences. On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs. Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from?
"From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found, according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. There were no friends to greet them, he wrote.

"There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning. During the first winter, half the Pilgrims -- including Bradford's own wife -- died of either starvation, sickness or exposure." For a long time, many of them continued to live on the Mayflower. There was nowhere else to live. "When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats. Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper!
"This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives," and teaching them to grow food and eat and all that, "rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of both the Old and New Testaments." The Bible. Remember, these were religious people. They set out on a journey to a place that they had no idea of, and they just found barren wilderness.
The very idea that they survived -- even before they began to prosper, the very idea that they just survived -- was what gave them pause to thank God. That was the original Thanksgiving, and that's not taught. The original Thanksgiving is taught as, "If it weren't for the Indians, Pilgrims would have died. The Indians saved their bacon! The Indians saved them." It's an understandable effort here, but that's not what happened, is the point. "Here's the part that's been omitted..."

The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors..." in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community," all 40 of them, "was entitled to one common share. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belong to the community as well. "....

It was a commune. It was socialism! Because they wanted to be fair. "They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well. Nobody owned anything. They just had a share in it. It was a commune, folks. "It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California -- and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way," in case you'd like to know. "Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives," and half the people weren't carrying their weight, didn't have to.
"He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage," and they got to keep the bulk of what they produced, "thus turning loose the power of the marketplace. That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism. And what happened? It didn't work! ... "What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation!
"But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years ... the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future. 'The experience that we had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years,'" meaning it was tough for a long time, "'that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing -- as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote."
Meaning: We thought we knew, but we were wrong.
"'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense...that was thought injustice.'" So what happened was, the hard workers began to see a bunch of slackers. Even in the first Pilgrims, they had a bunch of slackers, and they said, "What the hell are we doing? If everybody's getting an equal share here and half of these people aren't working, to hell with this!" and they threw it out.
William Bradford wrote about it in the journal. "The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property. Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work," and they were permitted to use it as they saw fit, "and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result? 'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.'"...

They had surpluses. You know what they did with the surpluses? They shared them with the Indians. Capitalism, as opposed to socialism, produced abundance, the likes of which they had never experienced. They remembered the help they got when they first landed from the Indians. They shared their abundance. That's the first Thanksgiving: A thanks to God for their safety, a thanks to God for their discovery, and a thanks to the Indians by sharing the abundance that they themselves produced after first trying what could only be called today Obamaism or Clintonism or socialism.

That, my friends, is the real story of Thanksgiving.[/SNIP]

Excerpted from..."Chapter 6: Dead White Guys, or What the History Books Never Told You, the True Story of Thanksgiving," from See, I Told You So.

You people have some odd notions as to what socialism is.
Yes, communal living resembles socialism but it is an insular thing more concerned with retreating from the social ills of the world rather than trying to transform it.
 
What the Pilgrims tried to practice, took place before the name "socialism" was coined. But it had all the important characteristics of it, and it failed as miserably as socialism usually fails, with half the people dying of exposure and starvation while they couldn't must enough interest in working hard, to fend off the effects of a rough winter.

When the governor took drastic action and threw out the socialistic practices, instituting capitalism, personal responsibility, and private charity in its place, the colony then blossomed, producing far more food, shelter, etc. than it had with twice the workers under their previous form of socialism.

The resident socialists and other liberal fanatics don't dare question these facts, but continue to try to pretend they didn't matter.

(So did the original Pilgrims, which resulted in a great many deaths. Apparently liberals just can't acknowledge reality, even when it kills them)
What he threw out then were the teachings of Jesus. Run with it.
The "I Hate Jesus" crowd always manages to show up.
 
Only 37 passengers of 102 were separatists. The 37 are from the Leiden congregation. They had been in Leiden for a decade.
 
What the Pilgrims tried to practice, took place before the name "socialism" was coined. But it had all the important characteristics of it, and it failed as miserably as socialism usually fails, with half the people dying of exposure and starvation while they couldn't must enough interest in working hard, to fend off the effects of a rough winter.

When the governor took drastic action and threw out the socialistic practices, instituting capitalism, personal responsibility, and private charity in its place, the colony then blossomed, producing far more food, shelter, etc. than it had with twice the workers under their previous form of socialism.

The resident socialists and other liberal fanatics don't dare question these facts, but continue to try to pretend they didn't matter.

(So did the original Pilgrims, which resulted in a great many deaths. Apparently liberals just can't acknowledge reality, even when it kills them)
What he threw out then were the teachings of Jesus. Run with it.
The "I Hate Jesus" crowd always manages to show up.
Most atheists don't hate Jesus, just his crappy judgmental fan club.
 
The Indians helped the Pilgrims, for which they gave thanks. That is true... but it's not the only thing that happened.

After a very bad start, the Pilgrims also helped themselves... by realizing that their form of government was destroying the colony. And they got rid of it, just in time.

We'll have the usual bevy of liberal socialists insisting that since what the Pilgrims did at first, didn't meet 100% of the dictionary definition of "socialism" (it only achieved 90% :cuckoo:), they don't want us to call it that. Or that the dates are wrong, or some other "important" objection that tries hard to miss the real significance.

But the fact is, what these liberals are pushing today, has never worked... including the first time it was tried on this continent in 1623. Then, as now, it caused only division, discontent, starvation, and death. Not until they got rid of it, did prosperity begin.

-------------------------------------------

http://www.post-journal.com/page/con....html?nav=5071

Thanksgiving: Deliverance From Socialism

November 21, 2009
By Daniel McLaughlin

In the fall of the year 1623, William Bradford and the pilgrims who resided in Plymouth Plantation sat down for a thanksgiving feast. It was a celebration of a plentiful harvest. It hadn't been so in the preceding couple of years.

They had arrived in the new world in 1620. After the death of John Carver, the first governor of the colony, in April of 1621, Mr. Bradford was chosen as the second governor. From the start of their journey from England, he had kept a diary of their activities. They had early on decided on communal living and agreed to work all together for a common store of provisions and share equally in its use. He wrote that this community was found to breed much confusion and discontent. It retarded employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. "For the young men that were most able and fit for labour and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to worke for other men's wives and children, with out any recompence." The strong and productive didn't get any more food or provisions than the unproductive, and that was thought injustice. The older and weaker thought it indignity and disrespect to them to have to do the same amount of work as the younger and stronger. He wrote, "for men's wives to be commanded to doe service for other men, as dresing their meate, washing their cloaths, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brooke it."

In other words, people produced less and were discontented when they were forced to work for the benefit of others, at the expense of their own well-being. Plymouth Colony had a first hand taste of the effects of socialism on a community. As Bradford described it, few crops were planted or harvested. For a couple of years, the people languished in misery, and many died.

In 1923, they decided to try something different to get a better crop and raise themselves up. The solution was to give each family its own plot of land, and to hold them responsible for their own welfare. The idea was that, if each family was allowed to prosper according to its own efforts, each person would have the incentive to work harder to plant and harvest more. Again in the words of Governor Bradford: "This had very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corne was planted than other ways would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deall of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now wente willingly into the field, and tooke their little-ones with them to set corne, which before would allege weakness, and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression."

William Bradford and the colonists had made a profound discovery. They had, in effect, conducted a controlled experiment in political organization. In everything other than property rights and personal responsibility, they continued as before. Under socialism, or communal living, or the Marxist philosophy of "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his need," the community languished. There was little incentive to produce more than the average. Thus the average declined and starvation and deprivation resulted.

Under conditions of private property, where families trusted in their own abilities, and "every man to his own particular," the people began to prosper. Bradford wrote in his journal several decades later that from that time on, they never suffered from deprivation, but rather the community improved and flourished.

That experiment has been conducted many times over the course of centuries, and indeed the whole of human history. The results are always ultimately the same. Where people are free to enjoy the benefits of their own labors and property, there is progress and plenty. Where property is subject to arbitrary confiscation, there is no incentive to produce. There is no incentive to try to accumulate wealth against unforeseen hardships of the future, and there is dependence, degradation and, ultimately, slavery.

This Thanksgiving season is a good time for reflection. Americans are traveling down a road toward the first Plymouth, the collectivism that leads to misery. As for me, I think we should be turning back toward the second Plymouth, toward personal responsibility and the resulting prosperity. Then we can join Governor Bradford in Thanksgiving for deliverance from the catastrophe called socialism.

The first thanksgiving was 1621.
 
How are the Pilgrims doing now? Oh wait....

lol, Massachusetts is one of the most liberal states in the Union, with low unemployment, a budget surplus, and one of the highest rated educational systems in the country.

...and they don't wear the funny shoes and hats anymore, either.
 
[SNIP]..."The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century... The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs. A group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community.".......
a group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community. "After eleven years, about forty of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World, where they would certainly face hardships, but could live and worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences. On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs. Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from?
"From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found, according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. There were no friends to greet them, he wrote.

"There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning. During the first winter, half the Pilgrims -- including Bradford's own wife -- died of either starvation, sickness or exposure." For a long time, many of them continued to live on the Mayflower. There was nowhere else to live. "When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats. Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper!
"This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives," and teaching them to grow food and eat and all that, "rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of both the Old and New Testaments." The Bible. Remember, these were religious people. They set out on a journey to a place that they had no idea of, and they just found barren wilderness.
The very idea that they survived -- even before they began to prosper, the very idea that they just survived -- was what gave them pause to thank God. That was the original Thanksgiving, and that's not taught. The original Thanksgiving is taught as, "If it weren't for the Indians, Pilgrims would have died. The Indians saved their bacon! The Indians saved them." It's an understandable effort here, but that's not what happened, is the point. "Here's the part that's been omitted..."

The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors..." in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community," all 40 of them, "was entitled to one common share. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belong to the community as well. "....

It was a commune. It was socialism! Because they wanted to be fair. "They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well. Nobody owned anything. They just had a share in it. It was a commune, folks. "It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California -- and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way," in case you'd like to know. "Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives," and half the people weren't carrying their weight, didn't have to.
"He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage," and they got to keep the bulk of what they produced, "thus turning loose the power of the marketplace. That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism. And what happened? It didn't work! ... "What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation!
"But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years ... the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future. 'The experience that we had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years,'" meaning it was tough for a long time, "'that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing -- as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote."
Meaning: We thought we knew, but we were wrong.
"'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense...that was thought injustice.'" So what happened was, the hard workers began to see a bunch of slackers. Even in the first Pilgrims, they had a bunch of slackers, and they said, "What the hell are we doing? If everybody's getting an equal share here and half of these people aren't working, to hell with this!" and they threw it out.
William Bradford wrote about it in the journal. "The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property. Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work," and they were permitted to use it as they saw fit, "and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result? 'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.'"...

They had surpluses. You know what they did with the surpluses? They shared them with the Indians. Capitalism, as opposed to socialism, produced abundance, the likes of which they had never experienced. They remembered the help they got when they first landed from the Indians. They shared their abundance. That's the first Thanksgiving: A thanks to God for their safety, a thanks to God for their discovery, and a thanks to the Indians by sharing the abundance that they themselves produced after first trying what could only be called today Obamaism or Clintonism or socialism.

That, my friends, is the real story of Thanksgiving.[/SNIP]

Excerpted from..."Chapter 6: Dead White Guys, or What the History Books Never Told You, the True Story of Thanksgiving," from See, I Told You So.

Learn to be laconic.

Some people are just terse. I'm not!
 
What the Pilgrims tried to practice, took place before the name "socialism" was coined. But it had all the important characteristics of it, and it failed as miserably as socialism usually fails, with half the people dying of exposure and starvation while they couldn't must enough interest in working hard, to fend off the effects of a rough winter.

When the governor took drastic action and threw out the socialistic practices, instituting capitalism, personal responsibility, and private charity in its place, the colony then blossomed, producing far more food, shelter, etc. than it had with twice the workers under their previous form of socialism.

The resident socialists and other liberal fanatics don't dare question these facts, but continue to try to pretend they didn't matter.

(So did the original Pilgrims, which resulted in a great many deaths. Apparently liberals just can't acknowledge reality, even when it kills them)

[SNIP]..."The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century... The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs. A group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community.".......
a group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community. "After eleven years, about forty of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World, where they would certainly face hardships, but could live and worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences. On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs. Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from?
"From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found, according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. There were no friends to greet them, he wrote.

"There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning. During the first winter, half the Pilgrims -- including Bradford's own wife -- died of either starvation, sickness or exposure." For a long time, many of them continued to live on the Mayflower. There was nowhere else to live. "When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats. Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper!
"This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives," and teaching them to grow food and eat and all that, "rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of both the Old and New Testaments." The Bible. Remember, these were religious people. They set out on a journey to a place that they had no idea of, and they just found barren wilderness.
The very idea that they survived -- even before they began to prosper, the very idea that they just survived -- was what gave them pause to thank God. That was the original Thanksgiving, and that's not taught. The original Thanksgiving is taught as, "If it weren't for the Indians, Pilgrims would have died. The Indians saved their bacon! The Indians saved them." It's an understandable effort here, but that's not what happened, is the point. "Here's the part that's been omitted..."

The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors..." in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community," all 40 of them, "was entitled to one common share. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belong to the community as well. "....

It was a commune. It was socialism! Because they wanted to be fair. "They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well. Nobody owned anything. They just had a share in it. It was a commune, folks. "It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California -- and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way," in case you'd like to know. "Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives," and half the people weren't carrying their weight, didn't have to.
"He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage," and they got to keep the bulk of what they produced, "thus turning loose the power of the marketplace. That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism. And what happened? It didn't work! ... "What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation!
"But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years ... the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future. 'The experience that we had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years,'" meaning it was tough for a long time, "'that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing -- as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote."
Meaning: We thought we knew, but we were wrong.
"'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense...that was thought injustice.'" So what happened was, the hard workers began to see a bunch of slackers. Even in the first Pilgrims, they had a bunch of slackers, and they said, "What the hell are we doing? If everybody's getting an equal share here and half of these people aren't working, to hell with this!" and they threw it out.
William Bradford wrote about it in the journal. "The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property. Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work," and they were permitted to use it as they saw fit, "and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result? 'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.'"...

They had surpluses. You know what they did with the surpluses? They shared them with the Indians. Capitalism, as opposed to socialism, produced abundance, the likes of which they had never experienced. They remembered the help they got when they first landed from the Indians. They shared their abundance. That's the first Thanksgiving: A thanks to God for their safety, a thanks to God for their discovery, and a thanks to the Indians by sharing the abundance that they themselves produced after first trying what could only be called today Obamaism or Clintonism or socialism.

That, my friends, is the real story of Thanksgiving.[/SNIP]

Excerpted from..."Chapter 6: Dead White Guys, or What the History Books Never Told You, the True Story of Thanksgiving," from See, I Told You So.

You people have some odd notions as to what socialism is.

And you have no idea!
 
Thanksgiving-Immigrants.jpg
 
The Indians wanted "documents"?

The Indians had some fear of the newcomers stealing their stuff?

The Indians had laws forbidding the newcomers from coming in?

The Indians didn't welcome the newcomers with open arms?

The Indians had a government forcing them against their will to help the newcomers whether they liked it or not, instead of doing it completely voluntarily?

Has little hazelnut ever put up a post that had ANY real relation to the subject at hand?

(Hint: All these questions have the same answer.)
 
In a nutshell (I love that term), the Pilgrims tried a socialistic society at first, and it wiped out half the colony, pretty gruesomely.

Then they threw it out, assigned each family a plot of land, and told them they could keep whatever they produced on it, to consume or trade or etc. as they wished.

The colony became much more productive and prospered ever since.

Liberals hate it when that happens. Because despite the chilling evidence to the contrary, they still want to believe socialism will work. And there's no limit to the number of other peoples' lives and happiness they are willing to sacrifice to try to make it so.
 
In a nutshell (I love that term), the Pilgrims tried a socialistic society at first, and it wiped out half the colony, pretty gruesomely.

Then they threw it out, assigned each family a plot of land, and told them they could keep whatever they produced on it, to consume or trade or etc. as they wished.

The colony became much more productive and prospered ever since.

Liberals hate it when that happens. Because despite the chilling evidence to the contrary, they still want to believe socialism will work. And there's no limit to the number of other peoples' lives and happiness they are willing to sacrifice to try to make it so.
Socialism does work, all over the world, even here my little man. What they tried to have was a Utopia, and those always end in failure because man is an immoral and selfish animal, something you hate and won't even acknowledge.
 
Well, looks like the liberals have been completely unable to refute what was said in the OP. They've come up with nothing more than the usual insults, vague tossed-off one-line cracks, and changes of subject.

That's a pretty common pattern among liberals when they're unable to refute facts. And since the last election, it has become even more common.
 
In a nutshell (I love that term), the Pilgrims tried a socialistic society at first, and it wiped out half the colony, pretty gruesomely.

Then they threw it out, assigned each family a plot of land, and told them they could keep whatever they produced on it, to consume or trade or etc. as they wished.

The colony became much more productive and prospered ever since.

Liberals hate it when that happens. Because despite the chilling evidence to the contrary, they still want to believe socialism will work. And there's no limit to the number of other peoples' lives and happiness they are willing to sacrifice to try to make it so.
Where is this prospering pilgrim community that you speak of?
 
Well, looks like the liberals have been completely unable to refute what was said in the OP. They've come up with nothing more than the usual insults, vague tossed-off one-line cracks, and changes of subject.

That's a pretty common pattern among liberals when they're unable to refute facts. And since the last election, it has become even more common.

On his father’s death, Bradford received an inheritance, which he later converted into money in 1611. With this funding he was able to establish himself as a marginally successful businessman. In 1620, financing was secured through a group of English investors, and plans were made to migrate to the new world (McGiffert 362). Three groups participated in the agreement for the financing of the excursion to the new world. The London adventurers provided the majority of the funding for the trip, while the planters and the adventurer planters possessed either one or two shares in the investment by either purchase or labor. Though the London adventurers provided much of the funding, and would hold the other two parties in servitude to repay the debt, they held no civil governing authority over the planters (Magill 75).
William Bradford The Puritan Ethic The Mayflower Compact - Student Pulse


Financing & Building the Colony

"I make no question now but that New Plymouth will quickly return your money again. For the most part they are honest and careful men. However, they have had many crosses."

- Emmanuel Altham, 1624

The Mayflower passengers went heavily into debt to come to America, borrowing from a group of English "merchant adventurers." Merchants and passengers together formed a stock company, which held all money, livestock and land. Assets were to be divided after seven years.

The Pilgrims were unlucky in their moneymaking efforts. Ships were lost at sea or captured by pirates. The Pilgrims had to ask for even more money for supplies.

The debt, which quickly became much larger, was renegotiated in 1626. Eight colonists, with four London associates, undertook to repay an agreed portion; these "undertakers" shared the debt with 45 Plymouth householders.

"Therefore they resolved, for sundrie reasons, to take in all amongst them, that were either heads of families, or single yonge men, that were of abillity, and free, (and able to governe them selvs with meete descretion, and their affairs, so as to be helpful in ye comone-welth,) into this partnership or purchass. First, yey considered that they had need of men & strength both for defence and carrying on of bussinesses. 2ly, most of them had borne ther parts in former miseries & wants with them, and therfore (in some sort) but equall to partake in a better condition, if ye Lord be pleased to give it. But cheefly they saw not how peace would be preserved without so doing, but danger & great disturbance might grow to their great hurte & prejudice other wise. Yet they resolved to keep such a mean in distribution of lands, and other courses, as should not hinder their growth in others coming to them.
"So they caled ye company togeather, and conferred with them, and came to this conclusion, that ye trade should be managed as before, to help to pay the debts; and all such persons as were above named should be reputed and inrouled for purchasers; single free men to have a single share, and every father of a familie to be alowed to purchass so many shares as he had persons in his family; that is to say, one for him selfe, and one for his wife, and for every child that he had living with him, one. As for servants, they had none, but what either their maisters should give them out of theirs, or their deservings should obtaine from ye company afterwards. Thus all were to be cast into single shares according to the order abovesaid; and so every one was to pay his part according to his proportion towards ye purchass, & all other debts, what ye profite of ye trade would not reach too; viz. a single man for a single share, a maister of a famalie for so many as he had. This gave all good contente."

- William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation

Plymouth Colony was not a success for the investors. The colonists eventually repaid 1800 pounds; the total invested may have been as high as 7000 pounds.

In order to pay off their debts, the Plymouth colonists grew corn and traded it to Natives in Maine for furs. The furs were shipped to England and sold at auction to hatters. The hatters shaved the wool off the pelt and then felted the wool to produce fashionable and expensive hats such as this. High-crowned hats, usually with decorative bands, were very popular in Western Europe for both men and women.

The Pilgrims' primary trading partner was England. They did not, however, do business with England exclusively. In 1627, Dutch colonists from New Amsterdam first visited the Pilgrims to arrange trade relations.
Pilgrim Hall Museum - About the Pilgrims - Financing Building the Colony

The Plymouth colonists also traded with other English colonies. In 1630. a thousand Puritans came from England to the Massachusetts Bay Colony north of Plymouth and founded Boston. People from Plymouth Colony traded with the new arrivals, who needed cattle and finished goods.
Through the Mayflower Compact, a government through consensus was formed. Leaders were to be chosen by the majority, and the body politic was to submit to rule by them (Palmer 276). The Pilgrims founded what would essentially be considered to be a Democratic government, ruled by officials elected by majority consensus. Magill asserts that, “the Pilgrims who landed at Plymouth in 1620 would have been appalled at the thought of being called democrats.” They did, however, lay the foundation for the future democratic government that would be put in place for the United States in the following century (Magill 76). The Compact was finally put into application following the election of the colony’s first governor, John Carver (Palmer 276). After Carver’s death the following April,
William Bradford The Puritan Ethic The Mayflower Compact - Student Pulse


The 1630 Bradford Patent
The Pilgrims had a contract with the company of merchant adventurers: all land and profits accrued to the company for 7 years, at which time the assets would be divided among the shareholders. Most of the Pilgrims held stock.

In 1626, the Pilgrims negotiated a more favorable contract. 53 Plymouth freemen, known as "The Purchasers," agreed to buy out the company over a period of years. In turn, 12 "Undertakers" (8 from Plymouth and 4 from London) agreed to pay off Plymouth’s debts in return for trade benefits.

Renegotiating the contract necessitated a new patent. The Council for New England granted the "Bradford Patent" jointly to Bradford and his associates, The Purchasers, in 1630.

The text of the 1630 Bradford Patent begins:
To all to whom these present shall come greetinge: - Whereas our late sovereigne lord King James for the advancemente of a colonie and plantacon in the cuntry called or knowne by the name of New-Englande in America, by his highnes letters pattents under the greate seale of Englande bearinge date att Westminster the third day of November in the eighteenth yeare of his highnes raigne of England &c. did give graunte and confirme unto the right honorble Lodowicke late lord duek of Lenox, George late lord marques of Buckingham, James Marques Hamilton, Thomas earle of Arundell, Robert earle of Warwicke and Ferdinando Gorges, knight, and divers others whose names are expressed in the said letters pattents and their successors that they should bee one bodie pollitique and corporate perpetually consistinge of forty persons, and that they should have perpetuall succession and one common seale to serve for the said body and that they and their successors should be incorporated called and knowne by the name of the Councell established at Plymouth in the county of Devon for the plantinge ruelinge orderinge and governinge of New Englande in America, and alsoe of his spetiall grace certaine knowledge and meere motion did give graunte and confirme unto the said presidente and councell and their successors forever under the reservations limitations and declaracons in the said letters pattents expressed, all that part and portion of the said cuntry now called New-England in America scituate, lyinge and beinge in breadth from ffourty degrees of northerly latitude from the aquinoctiall line to ffourty eight degrees of the said northerly latitude inclusively, and in length of and in all the breadth aforesaide throughout the maine lande from sea to sea, together alsoe with all the firme landes soyles grounds creeks inletts havens portes seas rivers islands waters fishinges mynes and mineralls...

In witness whereof, the said councell established att Plimouth in the county of Devon for the plantinge ruleinge orderinge and governinge of New England in America have hereunto putt their seale the thirteenth day of January in fifte yeare of the raigne of our Soveraigne Lord Charles by the grace of God, Kinge of Englande Scotland Fraunce and Ireland defender of the ffaithe &c Anno Domi 1629.
[signed] R. WARWICKE
Pilgrim Hall Museum - Collections - Patents


:itsok:




Edward Winslow,
Mourt's Relation:
"our harvest being gotten in, our governour sent foure men on fowling, that so we might after a speciall manner rejoyce together, after we had gathered the fruits of our labours ; they foure in one
day killed as much fowle, as with a little helpe beside, served the Company almost a weeke, at which time amongst other Recreations, we exercised our Armes, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and amongst the rest their greatest king Massasoyt, with some ninetie men, whom for three dayes we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five Deere, which they brought to the Plantation and bestowed on our Governour, and upon the Captaine and others. And although it be not always so plentifull, as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God,we are so farre from want, that we often wish you partakers of our plentie."

http://www.pilgrimhallmuseum.org/pdf/TG_What_Happened_in_1621.pdf

Note: it would be heinous to be starving and party for three days and not save the food.
 

Forum List

Back
Top