- Dec 6, 2009
- 77,656
- 4,167
- 1,815
When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.And now........Tinmore will get back to the thread's topic by telling us what "From the River to the Sea" means to him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.And now........Tinmore will get back to the thread's topic by telling us what "From the River to the Sea" means to him.
Another meaningless slogan from the Caliphate Inc.When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.And now........Tinmore will get back to the thread's topic by telling us what "From the River to the Sea" means to him.
Jordan ruled the Arabs living in Judea and Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem after they invaded and conquered those areas until 1967.There may have been people living in disputed territory prior to 67 but they weren't ruled by a country so they don't count.
Another meaningless slogan from the Caliphate Inc.When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.And now........Tinmore will get back to the thread's topic by telling us what "From the River to the Sea" means to him.
All You know is to say You lack rights while celebrating public executions of gays in the streets,
and demanding a Jew free Palestine as a national goal.
Jordan gave up their rights to the land.Jordan ruled the Arabs living in Judea and Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem after they invaded and conquered those areas until 1967.There may have been people living in disputed territory prior to 67 but they weren't ruled by a country so they don't count.
They were not allowed to annex all of those areas.
But Yes, there was a country ruling over all of those Arab people living in those areas.
That was not the point of your previous post.Jordan gave up their rights to the land.Jordan ruled the Arabs living in Judea and Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem after they invaded and conquered those areas until 1967.There may have been people living in disputed territory prior to 67 but they weren't ruled by a country so they don't count.
They were not allowed to annex all of those areas.
But Yes, there was a country ruling over all of those Arab people living in those areas.
ie the land was unowned available to be owned by Israel at their convenience.That was not the point of your previous post.Jordan gave up their rights to the land.Jordan ruled the Arabs living in Judea and Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem after they invaded and conquered those areas until 1967.There may have been people living in disputed territory prior to 67 but they weren't ruled by a country so they don't count.
They were not allowed to annex all of those areas.
But Yes, there was a country ruling over all of those Arab people living in those areas.
When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.
(COMMENT)Murdering Jews is not an inalienable right, even though you support the notion.When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.
RE: What does "from the river to the sea, Palestine must be free" mean?
⁜→ Dogmaphobe, P F Tinmore, et al,
(COMMENT)Murdering Jews is not an inalienable right, even though you support the notion.When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.
Two Points:
◈ The Arab Palestinians "HAVE" all the inalienable rights as a people.Which is it. Remember, inalienable rights are not a prelude to political suicide. Isreal is not obliged to take or permit a actionby the Arab Palestinians that will result in the death of the Jewish National Home (now or in the future). ALL nations (that survive) that the action that is is their own best interest.
✦Exactly what is the inalienable rights are you missing?◈ Positive Rights: IF the Arab Palestinians have these as Positive Rights, THEN Israel is obligated to perfom some action.
✦ Who has them?
(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;
(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;
◈ Negative Rights: IF the Arab Palestinians have these as Negative Rights, THEN Israel is obligation to refrain from an action.
Most Respectfully,
R
Palestine is the poster child of external interference.(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;
Another slogan.RE: What does "from the river to the sea, Palestine must be free" mean?
⁜→ Dogmaphobe, P F Tinmore, et al,
(COMMENT)Murdering Jews is not an inalienable right, even though you support the notion.When the Palestinians have all of their inalienable rights as a people.
Two Points:
◈ The Arab Palestinians "HAVE" all the inalienable rights as a people.Which is it. Remember, inalienable rights are not a prelude to political suicide. Isreal is not obliged to take or permit a actionby the Arab Palestinians that will result in the death of the Jewish National Home (now or in the future). ALL nations (that survive) that the action that is is their own best interest.
✦Exactly what is the inalienable rights are you missing?◈ Positive Rights: IF the Arab Palestinians have these as Positive Rights, THEN Israel is obligated to perfom some action.
✦ Who has them?
(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;
(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;
◈ Negative Rights: IF the Arab Palestinians have these as Negative Rights, THEN Israel is obligation to refrain from an action.
Most Respectfully,
RPalestine is the poster child of external interference.(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;
(COMMENT)Palestine is the poster child of external interference.(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;