What conservatism does to people.

Liberals in the United States have been losing political debates to conservatives for a quarter century. In order to start winning again, liberals must answer two simple questions: what is conservatism, and what is wrong with it? As it happens, the answers to these questions are also simple:


Q: What is conservatism?
A: Conservatism is the domination of society by an aristocracy.
Q: What is wrong with conservatism?
A: Conservatism is incompatible with democracy, prosperity, and civilization in general. It is a destructive system of inequality and prejudice that is founded on deception and has no place in the modern world.

Thats all I read and thats all I needed to. You dont know what your talking about.

The domination of a society by an aristocracy is called an oligarchy, not conservatism. Conservatism is limited government and maximum freedom. Sound money and a sound money system.

Here is an example of conservatism. Judging by your avatar your a homsexual, or you like homesexual people. Either way, its not my thing, but who am I to use the government enforce my beliefs on you? What your used to is neocon mentality, which is fascism at its finest.

whats in contradiction with freedom and prosperty is liberalism, and more importantly the mentality that the strong must take care of the weak. That a man that works 55 hours a week should not be entitled to better life then someone that doesnt want to work at all. Capitalism is the answer (we are not living in capitalism) but it should be controlled by the government. Take our current crisis, which is a crisis of wealth concentration. If our government was functioning then we would be structing our taxes around where the money in the money supply is. Then the funds can be used by the government to fund infastructure, the safety net, and innovation.
 
Philip E. Agre is a former associate professor of information studies at the University of California, Los Angeles. His new media writing includes the essay, Surveillance and Capture. He was successively the publisher of The Network Observer (TNO) and The Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). TNO ran from January 1994 until July 1996. RRE, an influential mailing list he started in the mid-1990s, ran for around a decade. A mix of news, Internet policy and politics, RRE served as a model for many of today's political blogs and online newsletters.[1]

Prior to his teaching position at UCLA, Agre held faculty positions at the University of Chicago, the School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences (now the School of Informatics) at the University of Sussex and the Department of Communication at the University of California, San Diego. He received his doctorate in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT in 1989.[2]

Agre went missing on October 16, 2009, but was found in good health on January 16, 2010.[3][4]

....

Philip E. Agre - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

:eek:

He's also manic depressive. Yea, that's someone who I'd want to take seriously. Not.
 
I couldn't agree with you more Sky Dancer. Conservatives are ruining this country. I am actually looking for someone to write regular blog posts for an up and coming political website. If you know anyone who might be interested, please send me a message.
 
Philip E. Agre is a former associate professor of information studies at the University of California, Los Angeles. His new media writing includes the essay, Surveillance and Capture. He was successively the publisher of The Network Observer (TNO) and The Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). TNO ran from January 1994 until July 1996. RRE, an influential mailing list he started in the mid-1990s, ran for around a decade. A mix of news, Internet policy and politics, RRE served as a model for many of today's political blogs and online newsletters.[1]

Prior to his teaching position at UCLA, Agre held faculty positions at the University of Chicago, the School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences (now the School of Informatics) at the University of Sussex and the Department of Communication at the University of California, San Diego. He received his doctorate in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT in 1989.[2]

Agre went missing on October 16, 2009, but was found in good health on January 16, 2010.[3][4]

....

Philip E. Agre - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

:eek:

He's also manic depressive. Yea, that's someone who I'd want to take seriously. Not.
But look who does take it seriously. ;)

I had to look into him because I honestly thought this had to be an exercise for students in critical analysis.

But, he is not faculty any longer.
 
When you start off with inherently false statements

"Q: What is conservatism?
A: Conservatism is the domination of society by an aristocracy.
Q: What is wrong with conservatism?
A: Conservatism is incompatible with democracy, prosperity, and civilization in general. It is a destructive system of inequality and prejudice that is founded on deception and has no place in the modern world."

You know the rest is absolute bullshit as well...

You weren't expecting an honest analysis were you?
 
I couldn't agree with you more Sky Dancer. Conservatives are ruining this country. I am actually looking for someone to write regular blog posts for an up and coming political website. If you know anyone who might be interested, please send me a message.

Prove it...

This whole economy is only the democrats fault...

"pass the CRA (forced lending) or you republicans are racists"

Progressive congress' have spent more than any republican congress...

Progressive ideas have destroyed this country... Conservatives want conservative cohesion and progressives want socialist anarchy.
 
:lol:

The only hate I see is down at occupy wall street - now that IS hate...

As usual the progressives accuse others of what they're guilty of themselves...
Well, that makes you too blind to see YOUR hate for OWS.
So that must make YOU a "progressive."

I never claimed I liked OWS... However OWS claims to be a peaceful movement when they're obviously ANYTHING but peaceful. OWS entire message is based on hatred of capitalism and hatred of the rich and hatred of those who have more than they do..

Progressivism is based on hate...

Conservatism is based on logic..
There is nothing logical about CON$ervative hate. CON$ervative hate is based purely on SPITE.
 
Well, that makes you too blind to see YOUR hate for OWS.
So that must make YOU a "progressive."

I never claimed I liked OWS... However OWS claims to be a peaceful movement when they're obviously ANYTHING but peaceful. OWS entire message is based on hatred of capitalism and hatred of the rich and hatred of those who have more than they do..

Progressivism is based on hate...

Conservatism is based on logic..
There is nothing logical about CON$ervative hate. CON$ervative hate is based purely on SPITE.

You only have one problem with that statement.

There is no conservative hate.
 
I never claimed I liked OWS... However OWS claims to be a peaceful movement when they're obviously ANYTHING but peaceful. OWS entire message is based on hatred of capitalism and hatred of the rich and hatred of those who have more than they do..

Progressivism is based on hate...

Conservatism is based on logic..
There is nothing logical about CON$ervative hate. CON$ervative hate is based purely on SPITE.

You only have one problem with that statement.

There is no conservative hate.
That is just a big old lie.
Lying is the Holy Eucharist of the hate religion of CON$ervatism.
 
Well, that makes you too blind to see YOUR hate for OWS.
So that must make YOU a "progressive."

I never claimed I liked OWS... However OWS claims to be a peaceful movement when they're obviously ANYTHING but peaceful. OWS entire message is based on hatred of capitalism and hatred of the rich and hatred of those who have more than they do..

Progressivism is based on hate...

Conservatism is based on logic..
There is nothing logical about CON$ervative hate. CON$ervative hate is based purely on SPITE.
Is ANY hate ever logical?

What's your point?
 
Well, that makes you too blind to see YOUR hate for OWS.
So that must make YOU a "progressive."

I never claimed I liked OWS... However OWS claims to be a peaceful movement when they're obviously ANYTHING but peaceful. OWS entire message is based on hatred of capitalism and hatred of the rich and hatred of those who have more than they do..

Progressivism is based on hate...

Conservatism is based on logic..
There is nothing logical about CON$ervative hate. CON$ervative hate is based purely on SPITE.

Give me an example of a conservative policy that's based on hate???

Let me guess because conservatives don't agree with the redistribution of wealth they must hate those who are too lazy or stupid to make a buck?

Because conservatives actually analyze the cost of programs and reject them if they're not solvent they must hate those who benefit from them..

Yeah I call analyzing programs and determining their solvency LOGICAL.... Meanwhile progressives don't analyze shit - they just say "sounds good to me, fuck it if it fails we can blame republicans."

Progressives are dishonest pieces of shit that could give a fuck about the future or the future of their kids just as long as they get what they want for free now and assholes like Pelosi and Obama will be glad to give you what you want NOW just as long as they can keep their power...

Hell, look at that bitch down at OWS that used her kids as a human shield...

Progressives are shit....
 
I guess the conservatives who wrote the most amazing document in history would be rolling over in their graves. Libs like to call the Founding Fathers liberals and maybe they were by 18th century standards but liberalism has drifted so far left that it's hard to tell the difference between Karl Marx and Barry Hussein Obama these days. The type of conservatism the left is wringing their hands and whining about is about strict adherence to the Constitution. Is there a problem with that? You can't find a conservative who says that Chairman Mao, the butcher of China, is their personal hero but the some people on the president's staff seem to think so.
 
Last edited:
I never claimed I liked OWS... However OWS claims to be a peaceful movement when they're obviously ANYTHING but peaceful. OWS entire message is based on hatred of capitalism and hatred of the rich and hatred of those who have more than they do..

Progressivism is based on hate...

Conservatism is based on logic..
There is nothing logical about CON$ervative hate. CON$ervative hate is based purely on SPITE.
Is ANY hate ever logical?

What's your point?

Hate can be logical as long as your reasons for that hate are logical.

Hating someone because they make the wrong decision that will ultimately affect you would be logical.

Hating a person over envy would be illogical and that is 99% of OWS...
 
I guess the conservatives who wrote the most amazing document in history would be rolling over in their graves. Libs like to call the Founding Fathers liberals and maybe they were by 16th century standards but liberalism has drifted so far left that it's hard to tell the difference between Karl Marx and Barry Hussein Obama these days. The type of conservatism the left is wringing their hands and whining about is about strict adherence to the Constitution. Is there a problem with that? You can't find a conservative who says that Chairman Mao, the butcher of China, is their personal hero but the some people on the president's staff seem to think so.

You're absolutely correct..

Conservatives only became conservative because the left kept on drifting or "progressing" farther and farther left.

Conservatives are generally classical liberals, conservatives embrace the founding fathers ideas - progressives don't, progressives want to write the rules and recreate standards as they "progress."
 
There is nothing logical about CON$ervative hate. CON$ervative hate is based purely on SPITE.
Is ANY hate ever logical?

What's your point?

Hate can be logical as long as your reasons for that hate are logical.

Hating someone because they make the wrong decision that will ultimately affect you would be logical.

Hating a person over envy would be illogical and that is 99% of OWS...
Hmmm. I hate very little because I find it not only useless, but damaging to me.

That seems like a logical thing for me to do. But others' mileages varies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top