What are YOU doing to help stop terror?

Im frankly tired of hate america first, make excuse and apologize for others second. The left better is like islam. Two factions. Radicals, and moderates, and if they dont take back the party, republicans, let alone conservatives wont work with a america-hater led party, that talks crap about our soldiers, and praises hamas, and makes apologies/special consessions to non-christians and illegal aliens, but american citzens, screw you.

Oh you mean like the truths you post?? Like the surge is working?? That sort of truth?? LOL...You are such a joke. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
IVe seen many conservatives willing to criticise their own party, and believe in the truth first, party second, but when the democrats tried to kick lieberman out of the party, for not towing the line of anti-war, that showed me another reason why i cant be a liberal.

Republicans have radicals, but they are not as bad as the liberal radicals, the republican radicals, dont hate america, dont make excuses for terrorists, and our party is not run by radicals. Atleast not to the degree the dems are, we allow people to dessent. And we dont call someone a traitor to their race, if they are not a republican.

Im frankly tired of hate america first, make excuse and apologize for others second. The left better is like islam. Two factions. Radicals, and moderates, and if they dont take back the party, republicans, let alone conservatives wont work with a america-hater led party, that talks crap about our soldiers, and praises hamas, and makes apologies/special consessions to non-christians and illegal aliens, but american citzens, screw you.
 
IVe seen many conservatives willing to criticise their own party, and believe in the truth first, party second, but when the democrats tried to kick lieberman out of the party, for not towing the line of anti-war, that showed me another reason why i cant be a liberal.

They didnt try to kick him out of the democratic party, he lost a primary. Or do you think the Democrats don't have a right to choose who they want to represent them?

Republicans have radicals, but they are not as bad as the liberal radicals, the republican radicals, dont hate america, dont make excuses for terrorists, and our party is not run by radicals. Atleast not to the degree the dems are, we allow people to dessent. And we dont call someone a traitor to their race, if they are not a republican.

No, the Republican radicals just blow up abortion clinics and invade poor third world countries...oh wait, thats the mainstream.
 
One of the things that disgusts me the most about the "war" on terror concept is that nearly everyone, regardless of whether they're on the far right or the far left, seems to think that dealing with terrorism is someone else's problem.

Time to wake up.

Traveling halfway around the world to guard some billionaire's oil well isn't deterring terrorism. Slapping a silly looped ribbon sticker on the back of your SUV isn't deterring terrorism. Peace marches don't deter terrorism.

At the end of the day, terrorists operate only on an individual or cell level. Which means that the civilized world has to fight them on the same level. Remember those "neighborhood watch" programs? If you haven't already done so, stop watching Idol and get to know your neighbors, dang it! Get to know the people who work in your favorite supermarket, and the people you commute with. (Maybe even read my signature, while you're at it.)

America was built by doers, not by partisan cheerleaders. What are you doing?

Politics isn't sports. Put down your pom poms and come up with some ideas.

Start off by forgetting such capitalist inpired "patriotic" tripe as, "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for the WOT."

Then ask WHY your country ends up bombing or invading a country every other year. Ask what makes America think it is ENTITLED to dictate to the entire world?

I'm convinced it's because of the inordinate Christian supremacist programming Americans get from cradle to grave.

There is nothing as narcissistic as believing you are "saved" and anyone who dares disagree with your phantasmagorical philosophy is fit only for the fires of Hell.

Once indoctrinated into the American version of Christianity, you can't help but think this way,

How did they come by such self-serving convictions? The massive extent of their privilege has convinced them that they’re the quintessence of human virtue, that they’re the most gifted of all golden children ever kissed by the radiant light of the sun. In other words, they’re the worst sort of emotionally arrested brats — spoiled children inhabiting adult bodies who mistake their feelings of infantile omnipotence for the benediction of superior ability: “I’m so special that what’s good for me is good for the world,” amounts to the sum total of their childish creed. In the case of narcissists such as these, over time, self-interest and systems of belief grow intertwined. Hence, within their warped, self-justifying belief systems, their actions, however mercenary, become acts of altruism.

Substitute Rockstroh’s “elites” with “decent family values Ameri-Christians,” and read the article this para came from
 
They didnt try to kick him out of the democratic party, he lost a primary. Or do you think the Democrats don't have a right to choose who they want to represent them?



Libs savaged Sen Lieberman because he put his country ahead of his party. It was nice to see the Moveon.org nuts lose this one
 
'The Daily Show’ Ridicules Bush-Supporting Vietnam Veteran
Posted by Melissa Lopez on June 27, 2007 - 18:23.
“The Daily Show” often pokes fun at President Bush and his closest advisors and Cabinet members, but isn’t it a little low, even for “The Daily Show,” to mock a Vietnam veteran because he supports the President?

On June 25, the Comedy Central show did exactly that, airing a pre-recorded and what appears to be a heavily edited interview with Bill Thomas, a Vietnam veteran who won four Bronze Stars and three Purple Heart medals. Back in April, Thomas decided to give one his Purple Heart to President Bush, believing that the President is a “a hero by virtue of the fact that he’s shown phenomenal courage in the face of bitter personal attacks on his competence, his integrity and everything else.”

watch the video

http://newsbusters.org/node/13784
 
Libs savaged Sen Lieberman because he put his country ahead of his party. It was nice to see the Moveon.org nuts lose this one

They savaged Liberman because he wasn't a liberal.
 
One of the things that disgusts me the most about the "war" on terror concept is that nearly everyone, regardless of whether they're on the far right or the far left, seems to think that dealing with terrorism is someone else's problem.

Time to wake up.

Traveling halfway around the world to guard some billionaire's oil well isn't deterring terrorism. Slapping a silly looped ribbon sticker on the back of your SUV isn't deterring terrorism. Peace marches don't deter terrorism.

At the end of the day, terrorists operate only on an individual or cell level. Which means that the civilized world has to fight them on the same level. Remember those "neighborhood watch" programs? If you haven't already done so, stop watching Idol and get to know your neighbors, dang it! Get to know the people who work in your favorite supermarket, and the people you commute with. (Maybe even read my signature, while you're at it.)

America was built by doers, not by partisan cheerleaders. What are you doing?

Every time an Iraqi or other arab types appear on the telly I shake my head grit my teeth and say "I hate those bastards" apart from that I am doing very little.What did you say you were doing again?:D
 
The democratic party, will not allow anyone who supports the war in their party, while the republicans are not kicking out people who are against the war.

The voters, on the the other hand, can do whatever they want. No offense, but their is a different between the party, and the voters.

And, while im against blowing up abortion clinics, that is a very small minority. And the U.S. does not invade poor third world countries cause it has nothing better to do. Saddam was a terrorist, and did not obey the terms to which he agreed, when we ended the war in 1991. Its not as simple as you make it.


They didnt try to kick him out of the democratic party, he lost a primary. Or do you think the Democrats don't have a right to choose who they want to represent them?



No, the Republican radicals just blow up abortion clinics and invade poor third world countries...oh wait, thats the mainstream.
 
wait a minute, liberals have to agree with everything the party says?. I guess their is no room for moderates in the democratic party.

Republican allow gays in the party, but democrats wont allow someone who is for the war?

Great... :eusa_dance: (sarcasm)

They savaged Liberman because he wasn't a liberal.
 
The democratic party, will not allow anyone who supports the war in their party, while the republicans are not kicking out people who are against the war.

As I said before, Lieberman was not kicked out, he lost a primary.

The voters, on the the other hand, can do whatever they want. No offense, but their is a different between the party, and the voters.

Yes there is. So why are you blaming the party for what the voters did?

And, while im against blowing up abortion clinics, that is a very small minority. And the U.S. does not invade poor third world countries cause it has nothing better to do. Saddam was a terrorist, and did not obey the terms to which he agreed, when we ended the war in 1991. Its not as simple as you make it.

Yes, those who blow up abortion clinics are, thankfully, a very small minority.

Saddam was NOT a terrorist. He was a dictator who viciously abused human rights. But we did not go there to save peoples lives...that much should be patently obvious to anyone with any decent knowledge of the other atrocious acts around the world...acts the US isn't lifting a finger to stop, much less invading countries to stop them.

wait a minute, liberals have to agree with everything the party says?. I guess their is no room for moderates in the democratic party.

Not everything...but you know...1 or 2 things might be nice.
 
He did lose a primary, but why was their such animosity towards him, god forbid he disagreed. Thats what im trying to say, the voters have every right to change their mind, but the animosity, is what bothers me.

Fair enough, im sorry. I take back that statement. I blame the party, NOT the voters, is that kosher ? (not being sarcastic)

I agree, one blown up abortion clinic is one too many.

Saddam hussein paid 25 thousand dollars per palestinian family, to the families to homicide bombers inside of israel. Now i am not suggesting as an american, that america is responsible for any other country, but factually speaking, he was a terrorist.

Oh, and yes you are right, we did not go there to stop saddam's genocide against his own people. we went there because we thought, we could easily topple him, and take care of our oil interests and youre right again, the u.s. doesnt government, not just bush's, going back a long time, doesnt give a dam about the worlds dictators, and its sad, cause, while I think we cant save the world, I think we could try and help, with and only with cooperation from the west of the world, and that brings me to the next point, i condemn the entire world for turning a blind eye to genocide.

Would you agree with me on atleast that?.

I respect you, and I honestly think you have some good points :)

As I said before, Lieberman was not kicked out, he lost a primary.



Yes there is. So why are you blaming the party for what the voters did?



Yes, those who blow up abortion clinics are, thankfully, a very small minority.

Saddam was NOT a terrorist. He was a dictator who viciously abused human rights. But we did not go there to save peoples lives...that much should be patently obvious to anyone with any decent knowledge of the other atrocious acts around the world...acts the US isn't lifting a finger to stop, much less invading countries to stop them.



Not everything...but you know...1 or 2 things might be nice.
 
The democratic party, will not allow anyone who supports the war in their party, while the republicans are not kicking out people who are against the war.

The voters, on the the other hand, can do whatever they want. No offense, but their is a different between the party, and the voters.

And, while im against blowing up abortion clinics, that is a very small minority. And the U.S. does not invade poor third world countries cause it has nothing better to do. Saddam was a terrorist, and did not obey the terms to which he agreed, when we ended the war in 1991. Its not as simple as you make it.

and hear I thought Dems were the "big tent" party

I guess it is a restricted tent
 
They didnt try to kick him out of the democratic party, he lost a primary. Or do you think the Democrats don't have a right to choose who they want to represent them?



Libs savaged Sen Lieberman because he put his country ahead of his party. It was nice to see the Moveon.org nuts lose this one

Which country was that, Israel of Noo Joisey? :lol:
 
He did lose a primary, but why was their such animosity towards him, god forbid he disagreed. Thats what im trying to say, the voters have every right to change their mind, but the animosity, is what bothers me.

Lets see...he is supporting a war fought under false pretenses that had no justification. Gee...you think people might get a little bit pissed?

Saddam hussein paid 25 thousand dollars per palestinian family, to the families to homicide bombers inside of israel. Now i am not suggesting as an american, that america is responsible for any other country, but factually speaking, he was a terrorist.

Not at all. Factually speaking he took care of the families of terrorists.

I think we could try and help, with and only with cooperation from the west of the world, and that brings me to the next point, i condemn the entire world for turning a blind eye to genocide.

This is what I am pretty much going to dedicate my life to doing...so yeah, you could say I agree.
 
Lets see...he is supporting a war fought under false pretenses that had no justification. Gee...you think people might get a little bit pissed?

False pretenses?...justification??

Larrikin, doncha know that America's evil, manifestly "LIBRUL" (to the average brainwashed Seppo) press provided the casus belli and the continuing justification for the WOT?!! Just the same as they promote pooftery, pedophilia, pornography, and (...shudder!) Peace :omg:

Geez, what are you; some sort of rump-pumping Pinko pansy?
 
Start off by forgetting such capitalist inpired "patriotic" tripe as, "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for the WOT."

Then ask WHY your country ends up bombing or invading a country every other year. Ask what makes America think it is ENTITLED to dictate to the entire world?

I'm convinced it's because of the inordinate Christian supremacist programming Americans get from cradle to grave.

There is nothing as narcissistic as believing you are "saved" and anyone who dares disagree with your phantasmagorical philosophy is fit only for the fires of Hell.

Once indoctrinated into the American version of Christianity, you can't help but think this way
I'll let you in on a little secret, Raff:

Most Americans, myself included, have just as much contempt for the holy-rolling wack jobs as you do. I still happen to believe in that good ol' "wall of separation" between church and state - which now might only be salvagable by purging the fundies from politics altogether.
 

Forum List

Back
Top