What are Liberals trying to Liberalize?

People like you are going to make November so much more enjoyable. Do you have early voting in your state? Wanna come down to Florida for a few days of fishing and camaraderie during election week? I'll buy you a beer when the race is called.

you talkin to yourself?
 
People like you are going to make November so much more enjoyable. Do you have early voting in your state? Wanna come down to Florida for a few days of fishing and camaraderie during election week? I'll buy you a beer when the race is called.

Like last November?

That was fun....
 
What are Liberals trying to Liberalize?

The tiny, closed in minds in indoctrinated extremist Republicans. Obviously. I thought everyone knew.

Uh huh. And you want to do this by force and increase laws and regulation to meet this objective? How does that meet the definition of "liberal?" Don't you think if your ideas were any good they could stand on their own and influence people by virtue of your ideas being logical and plausible? Since they apparently aren't you are willing to force your ideas onto people through laws and punishments? Doesn't that show that you succumb to defeat and that your ideology is a flop? How does forcing others to believe what you believe meet the definition of "liberal?"
 
Last edited:
Liberal = Progressive = Socialist = Commie = Anti American
As usual......you're wrong.....again.....

eusa_doh.gif

Stupid Fuckin' Teabagger


progressive: (adj) : making use of or interested in new ideas, findings, or opportunities : moving forward or onward

progressive: (n) : one believing in moderate political change and especially social improvement by governmental action : a member of a predominantly agrarian minor party that around 1912 split off from the Republicans

If you Teabaggers are incapable of learning the English-language, perhaps you'd be more-comfortable living somewhere-else.....somewhere with (your preference for) a Right-Wing dictator.
 
First, know your enemy. But even before that, make certain that they are your enemy.

The Founders knew what Govenment could become. We are witnessing thier warnings now.
No DOUBT!!!!!

(Uhhhhh.....that's "t-h-e-i-r warnings.")

eusa_doh.gif

Stupid Fuckin' Teabaggers

"On the dogmas of religion, as distinguished from moral principles, all mankind, from the beginning of the world to this day, have been quarreling, fighting, burning and torturing one another, for abstractions unintelligible to themselves and to all others, and absolutely beyond the comprehension of the human mind."
- Thomas Jefferson

.....And, we can't very-well forget about Tom Paine's warnings about "the inspired Word o' God."​

"Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we call it the word of a demon than the word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind."
- Thomas Paine
 
First, know your enemy. But even before that, make certain that they are your enemy.

The Founders knew what Govenment could become. We are witnessing thier warnings now.

It's interesting when you put it that way. In some sense we are privileged to witness it...in another way we are cursed for it.
wow.....how profound
297.png
.....and, typically-"conservative" (i.e. void of any-and-all actual details).

handjob.gif
 
They want to free government from the constraints of the Constitution

Free us from all responsibility


And that's really about it. Achieve that and we will have a totalitarian utopia.

How can "totalitarian" be a "utopia?" You mean there's people that think that once ALL their FREEDOM is GONE, they'll be HAPPY?

The idea of "totalitarian utopia" is actually an idea that has much stronger support on the right. After all, that's sorta the core message of Christianity. Eternal life in a celestial dictatorship.
 
liberal: (adj) : marked by generosity : given or provided in a generous and openhanded way : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives.


Exactly. The liberals of today are going on a feeling. They neglect economics in reality in favor of one dreamed up and that is unchained from reality. However, this thinking is not consolidated just to the, shall we call them, neoliberals. It is also the same economic philosophy adopted by the neoconservaatives of today.

The neoliberal wants the government to fix all the problems in society by introducing totalitarian legislation that forwards the agenda of A) freeing the chains of economic/fiscal constraint and B) to force others to comply with their version of "liberty". Which is not liberty at all. It is the exact opposite.

Which is what i've learned about most neoliberals. They have it all backwards, upside down and inside out.
 
They want to free government from the constraints of the Constitution

Free us from all responsibility


And that's really about it. Achieve that and we will have a totalitarian utopia.

How can "totalitarian" be a "utopia?" You mean there's people that think that once ALL their FREEDOM is GONE, they'll be HAPPY?

And if you don't like it, well we have a new and happier place for you to live.
 
Yeah, it's easy to point the finger...but can you tell me what Conservatives are trying to conserve, and how you expect improvement out of the front-running neo-con corporate cronies?

Bet you can't...

Just curious, you seem to give off the illusion that you're all knowing.
 
Yeah, it's easy to point the finger...but can you tell me what Conservatives are trying to conserve, and how you expect improvement out of the front-running neo-con corporate cronies?

Bet you can't...

Just curious, you seem to give off the illusion that you're all knowing.

They're not trying to conserve anything. At heart, it's a revolutionary movement. A right-wing Jacobinism.
 
Yeah, it's easy to point the finger...but can you tell me what Conservatives are trying to conserve, and how you expect improvement out of the front-running neo-con corporate cronies?

Bet you can't...

Just curious, you seem to give off the illusion that you're all knowing.

They're not trying to conserve anything. At heart, it's a revolutionary movement. A right-wing Jacobinism.

You give them more credit than I'm willing to.

Wake me up if/when the first shots are fired.
 

Forum List

Back
Top