What aggressive welfare reform should really look like...

[Norman]

Habitual able bodied beggars should be awarded a taxpayer funded fishing pole, a tent, some necessities for rugged survival and a bus ride to a resource rich wilderness. Early settlers had to start from scratch and live off the land...why shouldn't our pet humans have to do the same?

They would just find the closest human settlement and steal what they needed and probably be killed trying!

We need to return to the survival of the fittest and let evolution sort all of this out.

Just imagine DaShawn and ShaQuita hiking around the wilderness with fishing poles....I'm thinking they'd figure out how to pull their heads from their asses real quick if that was actually on the table...haha

So you dont hate all poor people, just poor bkack ones?

Not sure what a bkack is, but out of the poor I would say I hate single-mothers the most, child abuse is not cool. It's not a competition though, no need to compete Coyote.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

 

[Dragonlady]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Public money? That’s a good Leftist. That’s money taken from hard working Americans at gunpoint.

 

[Dragonlady]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Public money? That’s a good Leftist. That’s money taken from hard working Americans at gunpoint.

I wasn't aware that the IRS was going door to door with SWAT teams in tow.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a first world country. If you don't want to pay taxes, there are numerous jurisdictions which have no taxes. None of them are first world countries though.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Do you interpret promote the “general welfare” to mean “buy houses” for the scabs of society?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Public money? That’s a good Leftist. That’s money taken from hard working Americans at gunpoint.

I wasn't aware that the IRS was going door to door with SWAT teams in tow.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a first world country. If you don't want to pay taxes, there are numerous jurisdictions which have no taxes. None of them are first world countries though.

Stop paying your taxes and let us know how it goes.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Public money? That’s a good Leftist. That’s money taken from hard working Americans at gunpoint.

I wasn't aware that the IRS was going door to door with SWAT teams in tow.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a first world country. If you don't want to pay taxes, there are numerous jurisdictions which have no taxes. None of them are first world countries though.

The 50% here who don’t pay taxes should probably get the fuck out then huh?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Public money? That’s a good Leftist. That’s money taken from hard working Americans at gunpoint.

I wasn't aware that the IRS was going door to door with SWAT teams in tow.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a first world country. If you don't want to pay taxes, there are numerous jurisdictions which have no taxes. None of them are first world countries though.

Taxes are to pay for the general welfare of society. Roads, military, etc. Not for handouts to lazy ass druggies.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Public money? That’s a good Leftist. That’s money taken from hard working Americans at gunpoint.

I wasn't aware that the IRS was going door to door with SWAT teams in tow.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a first world country. If you don't want to pay taxes, there are numerous jurisdictions which have no taxes. None of them are first world countries though.

The 50% here who don’t pay taxes should probably get the fuck out then huh?

That’s why I support a flat tax. Everyone pays the same percentage of tax, whether you made $10 or $10M. Watch the lower income folks suddenly start bitching about spending.

 

[Coyote]

Habitual able bodied beggars should be awarded a taxpayer funded fishing pole, a tent, some necessities for rugged survival and a bus ride to a resource rich wilderness. Early settlers had to start from scratch and live off the land...why shouldn't our pet humans have to do the same?

I applaud your courage and inspiration! Thanks for being willing to engage in this brave new welfare experiment

Salvation Army is willing to donate the gear so you won't cost us a cent!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Exhibit 23,734 on how Democrats want to run America.

And you know who’s getting the checks too.

L.A.’s New Project Housing Homeless In Shipping Containers Costs $600k Per Home

The Daily Wire:

Let's have some accurate information about what's going on:

An Audit Lays Out What's Gone Wrong with L.A.'s Homeless Housing Measure

Once again, a government project isn't given to PEOPLE, but rather to corporations. It would be cheaper and more effective to give the money to the people and let them build their own housing.

If you'd read the article you'd know that the primary reason for the outrageous costs are non-construction related. They're 'soft' costs for consultants, architects, lawyers etc...AND of course, the profits for the contractors.

If projects like these could be done directly by government workers entirely, the costs would be way less - probably about 25%.

The problem is the capitalist system - we do not allow the government to do projects directly - they have to hire contractors who milk the government for all they can - and pay the workers squat.

But if anyone suggested that the government hire all the workers directly and design everything, Conservatives would be SCREAMING SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM!

Maybe we need to bring back the WPA:

Works Progress Administration - Wikipedia

But that would be Soooo Socialist!

Why not issue our bottom feeders a tent, a fishing pole and a one way bus fare to a resource rich forest? Early settlers started out that way...no?
Not “tolerant” enough?
What did our framers mean when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”?

Promoting the general welfare is very easy: It means spending public money for the public good.

Public money? That’s a good Leftist. That’s money taken from hard working Americans at gunpoint.

I wasn't aware that the IRS was going door to door with SWAT teams in tow.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a first world country. If you don't want to pay taxes, there are numerous jurisdictions which have no taxes. None of them are first world countries though.

How would you know? Stop paying your taxes long enough and they will show up.