what about the .001% ?

[Article 15]

Just sent out my OTS/OCS packs this past week actually. If I am not accepted, I will try every year while attending a masters program, and then every year after that until I am no longer qualified in relation to age. Why aren't you? Low IQ?

Well good luck.

To answer your question:

Been there. Done that. Have the t-shirt and medals.

You're welcome.

If that were true how can you be so dumb to realize what he means by .001%?

I get what he means but his math is off by a long shot. He's trying to claim he is 1 of 30,000. It's laughable.

 

[Intense]

I don't know that I will ever come close to being appreciative enough of what these folks do.

Great thread.

Oh please? You are dripping. Where were you during Nam?

Junior High.

 

[The T]

LOL

Nice!

 

[kaz]

I wonder what is with liberals that constantly use forum handles that clearly do not describe them:

Factfinder
Truthmatters
Truthseeker

all liberals that have no interest in facts or the truth. pretty funny.

I don't get the need either socialists like RightWinger and JakeStarkey who support the Democratic party down the line and repeat every ridiculous sweeping sterotype of Republicans to then say they are a Republican and the only problem with Republicans are they aren't Democrats. I don't see Republicans do that the other way.

 

[Photonic]

Oh look at Photonic sitting on his cloud of judgment handing life lessons down to all the sinners. Shut it.

http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/10C45.txt

Everyone complained about an ex marine wearing his uniform at an OWS rally, explain how this is different other than you guys agree with him.

are you retarded? It is a picture of a man in uniform, holding an apolitical sign. That is not against anything. It does not mention republican, democrat, a specific politician, threaten anyone, or anything of the like. You are grasping at straws and you like extremely unintelligent when you do. Plus, he hid his face, so he did not violate anything as it is a faceless message. Give it a rest....really you are not very intelligent.

LOL, and now you are saying it isn't political.

That's precious.

 

[Liberty]

http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/10C45.txt

Everyone complained about an ex marine wearing his uniform at an OWS rally, explain how this is different other than you guys agree with him.

are you retarded? It is a picture of a man in uniform, holding an apolitical sign. That is not against anything. It does not mention republican, democrat, a specific politician, threaten anyone, or anything of the like. You are grasping at straws and you like extremely unintelligent when you do. Plus, he hid his face, so he did not violate anything as it is a faceless message. Give it a rest....really you are not very intelligent.

LOL, and now you are saying it isn't political.

That's precious.

where does the sign mention anything political?

 

[Photonic]

are you retarded? It is a picture of a man in uniform, holding an apolitical sign. That is not against anything. It does not mention republican, democrat, a specific politician, threaten anyone, or anything of the like. You are grasping at straws and you like extremely unintelligent when you do. Plus, he hid his face, so he did not violate anything as it is a faceless message. Give it a rest....really you are not very intelligent.

LOL, and now you are saying it isn't political.

That's precious.

where does the sign mention anything political?

The sign is in opposition to a political movement, how the hell is this apolitical?

FYI, just because something doesn't have the word politics literally written on it doesn't mean it isn't for a political purpose.

 

[Liberty]

LOL, and now you are saying it isn't political.

That's precious.

where does the sign mention anything political?

The sign is in opposition to a political movement, how the hell is this apolitical?

Grasping at straws much? Where does the UCMJ say anything about making a sign and banning the words occupy and 99%? I can't seem to find it.

 

[Photonic]

where does the sign mention anything political?

The sign is in opposition to a political movement, how the hell is this apolitical?

Grasping at straws much? Where does the UCMJ say anything about making a sign and banning the words occupy and 99%? I can't seem to find it.

Wow, that's an absurd argument and you know it.

God I'm not trying to win a fucking debate here, I'm trying to point out a very real issue with the use of uniform here.


I APPROVE OF THE SIGN, I DON'T APPROVE OF THE USE OF UNIFORM.

 

[Liberty]

The sign is in opposition to a political movement, how the hell is this apolitical?

Grasping at straws much? Where does the UCMJ say anything about making a sign and banning the words occupy and 99%? I can't seem to find it.

Wow, that's an absurd argument and you know it.

God I'm not trying to win a fucking debate here, I'm trying to point out a very real issue with the use of uniform here.


I APPROVE OF THE SIGN, I DON'T APPROVE OF THE USE OF UNIFORM.

It's not like the guy is holding a sign that says, "Pass House bill 2424" or something....
By your definition it should be illegal for a military member to applaud if the President is speaking at a base or something.

 

[Photonic]

Grasping at straws much? Where does the UCMJ say anything about making a sign and banning the words occupy and 99%? I can't seem to find it.

Wow, that's an absurd argument and you know it.

God I'm not trying to win a fucking debate here, I'm trying to point out a very real issue with the use of uniform here.


I APPROVE OF THE SIGN, I DON'T APPROVE OF THE USE OF UNIFORM.

It's not like the guy is holding a sign that says, "Pass House bill 2424" or something....

Are you doing this on purpose?

 

[Liberty]

Wow, that's an absurd argument and you know it.

God I'm not trying to win a fucking debate here, I'm trying to point out a very real issue with the use of uniform here.


I APPROVE OF THE SIGN, I DON'T APPROVE OF THE USE OF UNIFORM.

It's not like the guy is holding a sign that says, "Pass House bill 2424" or something....

Are you doing this on purpose?

what? I honestly don't see your point. its not a political sign at all.

 

[Listening]

If this makes people hate the OWS even more then it is mission accomplished.

I never thought of OWS until you brought it up.

OWS can exist because of the sacrifice of others.

That is about the only connection I see.

You comment makes little sense to me.

From the OP: "I have multiple deployments to countries you"99%" would never occupy."

Didn't you read it? It is an attack on the occupy movement implying that they (some of whom are soldiers with multiple deployments) have no idea what sacrifice is about.

He was making a statement to the 99% of which I am one.

And I happen to agree with him.

Your desire to make this about the people of OWS is fine.

I read it and did not see an attack anywhere. He was making a statement and I took it to mean me as well as the OWS.

I guess I am just not as sensitive.

 

[Listening]

Quote: Originally Posted by Liberty

just like the 1960s hippy movement, OWS wants to incite violence and then play the victim card to garner sympathy in the media since they lack any coherent or intelligent message. It will fail now just like it did then. You people are worthless scum.
===========
nice racist undertone there.

Yes, damn those students at Berkley for hitting those billy clubs with their spleens.

And damn that 84 year old lady in Seattle for hitting that pepper spray with her face.

And damn that Iraq war veteran in Oakland for hitting that tear gas canister with his skull.

What ?

You could not find one of your standard jerk-off graphs to post ?

Fraud.