We’s all the UN’s chillun

[Flanders]

Before getting to education it is important to show how Hussein and his New World Order backers are attacking the American people on every front. I’ll begin with the Senate.

The Senate is the machinery Hussein & Company intend to use to hand this country to global government. Without the Senate they would have to rely on the media and the parasite class alone.

Let’s go back to 2008

I said electing a sitting senator was the worst thing Americans could do. Go back to before the nominating conventions in 2008 and you’ll see that the media made sure a senator was going to win. Why a senator? Answer: There are more traitors in the Senate eager to rubberstamp any betrayal a senator cum president sends over.

Come hell or high water the country was going to get Senator Hillary Clinton, Senator Hussein, Senator Joe Biden or Senator John McCain. As it turned the country got three. As soon as they took over I said Hussein’s Administration was a Senate Administration.

For the first time in history the Senate ratified a treaty in a lame-duck session. The New START Treaty was ratified with the help of 13 Republicans; Senators Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), Robert Bennett (Utah), Scott Brown (Mass.), Thad Cochran (Miss.), Susan Collins (Maine), Bob Corker (Tenn.), Judd Gregg (N.H.) Johnny Isakson (Ga.), Mike Johanns (Neb.), Richard Lugar (Ind.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska.), Olympia Snowe (Maine.), and George Voinovich (Ohio).

The Senate also voted to pass the Affordable Care Act. —— first the Senate passed it, now they will protect it.

Before the XVII Amendment was implemented (there is some doubt that it was ratified) senators represented their states. The ACA shows that senators no longer put their state first:

Conservatives press the states to keep fighting ‘ObamaCare’
By Sam Baker - 11/09/12 10:12 AM ET

Conservatives press the states to keep

In effect, governors, and state legislatures, have been placed in the position of fighting a law their senators may have voted for —— 60 out of 100 senators voted for it. They were all Democrats. No matter. The ACA was going to pass one way or another. A few RINO were on tap in the event a Democrat or two dropped dead just before the vote was taken.

United Nations treaties

The recent election held out some hope that Republicans would win the Senate. Had that happened Republican senators would not have had enough cover to chance ratifying any UN treaty on a “bipartisan vote.” There is still a chance that 34 Republicans will NOT RATIFY a treaty in a Democrat-controlled Senate. It’s a slim chance at best because RINO can vote to ratify giving Democrats enough votes to reach the required the 67.

The Arms Trade Treaty is the first one Hussein will try to ratify. Here’s a little background:

The good news is that the ATT process failed to reach agreement on the terms of an arms treaty, and that at least for now, the matter is dead. The bad news is that neither this arms-control effort, nor any other of the many bad ideas emanating from the UN headquarters on the banks of New York City’s East River, is ever really dead. Much like Great Britain’s Fabian Society, which seeks to achieve incremental political goals by simply outlasting its opponents, the bureaucracy at the United Nations will simply re-group, schedule more meetings and present more “papers” about the dire need to rein in out-of-control international “trafficking” in firearms.

The United States played a decidedly ambivalent role in this latest rendition of “Keystone Kops at the United Nations.” President Barrack Obama had signaled three years ago that the US was reversing a decade of opposition to a formal UN firearms protocol such as the ATT, and would support the treaty process. However, given the timing of this ATT process in the middle of a tight presidential race – and the fact that anything smacking of gun control would likely cost the incumbent votes in November -- Obama is likely offering a quiet prayer of thanks that the ATT is a dead issue for the moment.

In the summer of 2001, when the UN’s foray into gun control was just getting underway, Washington took a very different approach. Under the decisive leadership of then-Undersecretary of State John Bolton, the U.S. made clear it would neither support nor allow to be adopted any international instrument that directly or indirectly infringed any constitutionally-protected rights. Throughout the administration of George W. Bush, Bolton proactively prevented the international body from formally adopting any such instrument.

UN Firearms Treaty Dead...At Least For Now
Bob Barr
August 1, 2012

UN Firearms Treaty Dead...At Least For Now - Bob Barr - [page]

Bob Barr was right on the money. It’s back:

Proof: Obama Is Coming for Your Guns - YouTube

Ratifying United Nations treaties is only the beginning of Hussein’s second term betrayals. He is giving the UN the green light to come after America’s children like never before. Note the reference to Bolsheviks. Did Hussein get his plan for educating America’s children from his mentor —— Communist Frank Marshall Davis:

When your children or grandchildren venture off to school in America, someday soon, most likely, their education curricula will be developed not by a state education association, or even by the National Education Association (NEA). Rather, they will be developed by the United Nations -- specifically, their education arm, United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). This is an educational organization that could not only threaten the sovereignty of America, but indoctrinate our unsuspecting children with a dangerous progressive ideology -- an ideology in which children are no longer taught that America is the land of the free and home of the brave or the right to freedom of worship.

XXXXX​

According to a White House press release dated March 10, 2009, "President Obama is committed to helping states develop seamless, comprehensive, and coordinated 'Zero to Five' systems to improve developmental outcomes and early learning for all children."

XXXXX​

Educational elites support the president. "These new partnerships must also inspire students to take a bigger and deeper view of their civic obligations -- not only to their countries of origin but to the betterment of the global community."

XXXXX​

This is not the first time early education and a call to hand over babies to the government has been attempted. The First Congress of Bolshevik Workers said in 1918 that "we must remove children from the crude influence of their families. We must take them over, and to speak frankly, nationalize them. From the first days of their lives they will be under the healthy influence of children's nurseries and schools."

The Bolsheviks understood that the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.

November 10, 2012
Early Education or Early Indoctrination?
By Jamie A. Hope

Articles: Early Education or Early Indoctrination?

If UNESCO is not enough to scare you try another UN agency —— UNICEF:

A UNICEF-funded book being passed out at the United Nations Child Summit encourages children to engage in sexual activities with other minors and with homosexuals and animals.

XXXXX​

An accompanying workshop book produced by the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) tells Latin American mothers and teens: "Situations in which you can obtain sexual pleasure: 1. Masturbation. 2. Sexual relations with a partner - whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. 3. A sexual response that is directed toward inanimate objects, animals, minors, non-consenting persons."

The book, which was distributed by the Mexican government with U.N. funding, suggests lesbian sex as an acceptable alternative for girls.

XXXXX​

UNICEF spokesman Alfred Ironside acknowledged U.N. funding for the book, but said it was produced by the Mexican government in 1999 and pulled from circulation "when the content was more carefully reviewed."

Child sex book given out at U.N. summit
Washington Times 05/10/02: George Archibald

Child sex book given out at U.N. summit

I’ll let you decide why it was pulled from circulation.

Finally, I have to wonder why Latinos supported Hussein in such large numbers. I will never believe decent people want their children to engage in bestiality and all the of rest of it. Latinos may not realize it, but that is exactly what they vote for when they support Hussein and his pals at the UN.

 

[blimpo]

Senators aren't supposed to represent their states in opinion. That's part of the reason they're elected for the longest terms of any elected officials(6 years).
Senators are supposed to weigh the evidence and vote for what's best for the country, keeping in mind what voters back home might want.
This is why only the Senate votes on treaties.

If you want direct opinion representation, that comes from those elected to the House. If they don't pay attention to what the folks back home want these guys are out quickly (2 years).

 

[Flanders]

blimpo;6350163

Senators aren't supposed to represent their states in opinion.

To blimpo: That makes no sense.

blimpo;6350163

That's part of the reason they're elected for the longest terms of any elected officials(6 years).

To blimpo: This is what the Constitution originally said:

Article 1
Section 3

1: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.

Voters gave the country long-serving senators elected by the people thanks to the XVII Amendment. Some senators served for a long time before the XVII Amendment, but those senators were in the mode the Founders intended.

blimpo;6350163

Senators are supposed to weigh the evidence and vote for what's best for the country, keeping in mind what voters back home might want.

To blimpo: Senators have not the served the country since 1945. Instead of senators serving their states as the Founders intended, senators neither serve their states, nor the people who elected them. Senators have been serving the New World Order crowd and the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) since 1945.

blimpo;6350163

This is why only the Senate votes on treaties.

To blimpo: Treaties meant treaties between nations prior to membership in the United Nations. The United Nations is an organization not a nation. Ratifying UN treaties automatically means signing a treaty with America’s enemies simply because every one of America’s enemies is also a member state. Tell me how senators are doing what is best for country when they ratify any UN treaty?

Incidentally, the XVII Amendment was implemented in 1913. In 1919 senators refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles because it included the League of Nations. More importantly, the American people wanted no part of the League, just as most Americans today want no part of the United Nations.

Thirty-two years after the XVII Amendment was implemented all but two senators voted to join the United Nations. It’s fair to say it took 32 years for the Senate to go from an institution dedicated to America’s independence to an institution that betrays this country at every turn.

blimpo;6350163

If you want direct opinion representation, that comes from those elected to the House. If they don't pay attention to what the folks back home want these guys are out quickly (2 years).

To blimpo: Senators never do what the folks back home want. Passing the Affordable Care Act is the most egregious example. So why are the same senators elected time after time? One answer is the media. Another answer is offered by Winston Churchill:

The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.

 

[blimpo]

Whatever you said...

 

[Samson]

Is there a fucking point to this thread?

I mean other than the ability of the OP to cut'n paste a bunch of shit cobbled together in an absurd, desperate attempt to be relevant about something?