We’re Going to Get Creamed’: Lerner Emails Paint Picture of Planning 501(c)(4) Scruti

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
You all voted for Obama to unleash this government on you with brown shirts and jackboots... and it's not pretty whatsoever...no wonder Democrats want this investigation stopped...
links in article at site


SNIP;


Former IRS official referred to the Tea Party cases as “very dangerous” and expected legal action because they were “itching for a constitutional challenge.”



by
Rodrigo Sermeño





WASHINGTON – A House committee report claims Lois Lerner, who oversaw the Internal Revenue Service’s scrutiny of tea party groups seeking tax-exempt status, lied to Congress about her involvement in the targeting scandal.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a report Tuesday concluding that Lerner “created unprecedented roadblocks for Tea Party organizations” and “worked surreptitiously to advance new Obama administration regulations that curtail the activities of existing 501(c)(4) organizations.”




In 2011, Lerner directed the manager of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Technical Unit to subject Tea Party cases to a “multi-tier review” system. She also stated in an email to her staff that the IRS Cincinnati office “should probably not have these cases.”

In one email, Lerner referred to the Tea Party cases as “very dangerous” and suggested the Chief Counsel’s office should be involved in the review process.

In another email, Lerner forwarded an article to Nanette Downing, director of exempt-organization examinations, from the liberal news site Mother Jones about how “dark money” was being used to influence the political process.

The report accuses Lerner of seeking to “convey her agreement with this sentiment publicly” and engaging “in a wholly inappropriate effort to circumvent federal prohibitions in order to publicize her efforts to crack down on a particular Tea Party applicant.”

Lerner expressed concern that the Citizens United vs. Federal Elections ruling would hurt Democratic senators seeking re-election in 2012. In response to an article sent to her by a colleague about Senate Democrats’ complaint to the FEC that political-oriented nonprofits were violating election law, Lerner writes: “Perhaps the [Federal Election Commission] will save the day.”



ALL of it here
PJ Media » ?We?re Going to Get Creamed?: Lerner Emails Paint Picture of Planning 501(c)(4) Scrutiny

a lot of comments with this article at the site
 
Last edited:
Every American, no matter the political affiliation should be horrified by this......because what comes around goes around. Hopefully, I don't need to elaborate on this. This shit cant happen on either side.......ever.
 
Still looking for any harm done to the TeaTards

Anyone? Anyone?
 
Still looking for any harm done to the TeaTards

Anyone? Anyone?

Well when it take a few years to get the review through,if at all,so ya harm done,there sparky

But thats not the real problem,you have no trouble supporting a corrupt system as long as its the other guy getting screwed. That's about as American as Hugo Chavase,not to mention just plan bad and dishonest.
 
Still looking for any harm done to the TeaTards

Anyone? Anyone?

Well when it take a few years to get the review through,if at all,so ya harm done,there sparky

But thats not the real problem,you have no trouble supporting a corrupt system as long as its the other guy getting screwed. That's about as American as Hugo Chavase,not to mention just plan bad and dishonest.

It didn't take years and their tax status was approved

Still looking for damages
 
Still looking for any harm done to the TeaTards

Anyone? Anyone?

Well when it take a few years to get the review through,if at all,so ya harm done,there sparky

But thats not the real problem,you have no trouble supporting a corrupt system as long as its the other guy getting screwed. That's about as American as Hugo Chavase,not to mention just plan bad and dishonest.

It didn't take years and their tax status was approved

Still looking for damages

:popcorn:
 
Still looking for any harm done to the TeaTards

Anyone? Anyone?

Well when it take a few years to get the review through,if at all,so ya harm done,there sparky

But thats not the real problem,you have no trouble supporting a corrupt system as long as its the other guy getting screwed. That's about as American as Hugo Chavase,not to mention just plan bad and dishonest.

It didn't take years and their tax status was approved

Still looking for damages


s0n......64,000 posts!!! Whats up with that? Love to know who's paying you to troll on here??!! Nobody's life is that pathetic.:D
 
You all voted for Obama to unleash this government on you with brown shirts and jackboots... and it's not pretty whatsoever...no wonder Democrats want this investigation stopped...
links in article at site


SNIP;


Former IRS official referred to the Tea Party cases as “very dangerous” and expected legal action because they were “itching for a constitutional challenge.”



by
Rodrigo Sermeño





WASHINGTON – A House committee report claims Lois Lerner, who oversaw the Internal Revenue Service’s scrutiny of tea party groups seeking tax-exempt status, lied to Congress about her involvement in the targeting scandal.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a report Tuesday concluding that Lerner “created unprecedented roadblocks for Tea Party organizations” and “worked surreptitiously to advance new Obama administration regulations that curtail the activities of existing 501(c)(4) organizations.”




In 2011, Lerner directed the manager of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Technical Unit to subject Tea Party cases to a “multi-tier review” system. She also stated in an email to her staff that the IRS Cincinnati office “should probably not have these cases.”

In one email, Lerner referred to the Tea Party cases as “very dangerous” and suggested the Chief Counsel’s office should be involved in the review process.

In another email, Lerner forwarded an article to Nanette Downing, director of exempt-organization examinations, from the liberal news site Mother Jones about how “dark money” was being used to influence the political process.

The report accuses Lerner of seeking to “convey her agreement with this sentiment publicly” and engaging “in a wholly inappropriate effort to circumvent federal prohibitions in order to publicize her efforts to crack down on a particular Tea Party applicant.”

Lerner expressed concern that the Citizens United vs. Federal Elections ruling would hurt Democratic senators seeking re-election in 2012. In response to an article sent to her by a colleague about Senate Democrats’ complaint to the FEC that political-oriented nonprofits were violating election law, Lerner writes: “Perhaps the [Federal Election Commission] will save the day.”



ALL of it here
PJ Media » ?We?re Going to Get Creamed?: Lerner Emails Paint Picture of Planning 501(c)(4) Scrutiny

a lot of comments with this article at the site

Do you understand the difference between allegations and evidence? No, of course you don't. Nothing in your post and nothing in the link you provided include evidence.
 
You all voted for Obama to unleash this government on you with brown shirts and jackboots... and it's not pretty whatsoever...no wonder Democrats want this investigation stopped...
links in article at site


SNIP;


Former IRS official referred to the Tea Party cases as “very dangerous” and expected legal action because they were “itching for a constitutional challenge.”



by
Rodrigo Sermeño





WASHINGTON – A House committee report claims Lois Lerner, who oversaw the Internal Revenue Service’s scrutiny of tea party groups seeking tax-exempt status, lied to Congress about her involvement in the targeting scandal.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a report Tuesday concluding that Lerner “created unprecedented roadblocks for Tea Party organizations” and “worked surreptitiously to advance new Obama administration regulations that curtail the activities of existing 501(c)(4) organizations.”




In 2011, Lerner directed the manager of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Technical Unit to subject Tea Party cases to a “multi-tier review” system. She also stated in an email to her staff that the IRS Cincinnati office “should probably not have these cases.”

In one email, Lerner referred to the Tea Party cases as “very dangerous” and suggested the Chief Counsel’s office should be involved in the review process.

In another email, Lerner forwarded an article to Nanette Downing, director of exempt-organization examinations, from the liberal news site Mother Jones about how “dark money” was being used to influence the political process.

The report accuses Lerner of seeking to “convey her agreement with this sentiment publicly” and engaging “in a wholly inappropriate effort to circumvent federal prohibitions in order to publicize her efforts to crack down on a particular Tea Party applicant.”

Lerner expressed concern that the Citizens United vs. Federal Elections ruling would hurt Democratic senators seeking re-election in 2012. In response to an article sent to her by a colleague about Senate Democrats’ complaint to the FEC that political-oriented nonprofits were violating election law, Lerner writes: “Perhaps the [Federal Election Commission] will save the day.”



ALL of it here
PJ Media » ?We?re Going to Get Creamed?: Lerner Emails Paint Picture of Planning 501(c)(4) Scrutiny

a lot of comments with this article at the site

Do you understand the difference between allegations and evidence? No, of course you don't. Nothing in your post and nothing in the link you provided include evidence.

They are still trying to get to all that dingbat, but you knew that already
 
Still looking for any harm done to the TeaTards

Anyone? Anyone?

Has any one of the the applicants been identified? If all of the these organizations been wronged I would think they would be screaming at the top of their voices, if for nothing else for the free PR. Show me a non-profit who does not want free PR.
 
Repubs might recover the smidgen ;) of reputation they USED TO HAVE by forcing Issa (R) to step down.


ghey



That guy E Cummings is a spectacular racist from the word go:2up:......if you are white and not a far lefty, he's gonna come after you and label you with the R word. The GOP is stoopid.......every swinging dick with half a brain knows Cummings is a racist. They need to start saying it.......a lot!!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::fu:
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top