Well They Finaly Went And Did It In San Fran'queer'co...

Kathianne said:
Not sure about the constitutionality of this, but is SF still part of the US?

I think their water must be drugged :wtf:


So now I wonder what happens when a business owner is held up at gun point by a criminal?? Are they supposed to just stand there and get shot, run and get shot? Or can they break out a shotgun and blow the criminals head off then get sued by the criminals next of kin, or maybe get arrested by the cops for defending themselves??
I wonder how this works???

Any liberals who support this ban want to explain how this works????
 
Pale Rider said:
They did the same thing in Washington D.C..

Yeah, and my sister goes to college in Fairfax. As a political major, she goes to D.C. every once in a while, but being white on the west side is a death sentence. Cops who find a white guy/girl on the west side of D.C. call for backup, heavy backup if it's night, and escort the poor victim-to-be out of the ghetto. Yep, a gun ban worked really well there.

The second ammendment is not an obselete ammendment designed to allow state militias. It's the constitution's backup plan. It's a failsafe in case the government runs amok, like it is right now. Tyranny cannot subjugate an armed populace as easily as it can an unarmed populace.

Now, I just saw a guy on a "caught on tape" show. He was a gas station attendant who got robbed. The perp bought a handgun on the streets from an illegal vendor who stole the thing and tried to get rid of the serial number. At the end of his crime, this shameless killer leaned over the counter to shoot the attendant and eliminate the only witness. The only thing that saved the attendant was the handgun he legally owned and fired back at the perp. If handguns had been illegal, the perp would still have had his gun, but the attendant wouldn't have had his and would be dead right now instead of merely injured.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
The really nasty part about this is that (back in the 70's or 80's I think) the second amendment was construed to apply only to militias and that the states could do this. I think, but cannot prove, that it was during the brady bill challenges. Personally, if I ever visit the land of fruits and nuts again, I will be armed. If caught, my retirement check will go to some lawyers mortgage. If I don't make the papers.
 
Hobbit said:
Yeah, and my sister goes to college in Fairfax. As a political major, she goes to D.C. every once in a while, but being white on the west side is a death sentence. Cops who find a white guy/girl on the west side of D.C. call for backup, heavy backup if it's night, and escort the poor victim-to-be out of the ghetto. Yep, a gun ban worked really well there.

The second ammendment is not an obselete ammendment designed to allow state militias. It's the constitution's backup plan. It's a failsafe in case the government runs amok, like it is right now. Tyranny cannot subjugate an armed populace as easily as it can an unarmed populace.

Now, I just saw a guy on a "caught on tape" show. He was a gas station attendant who got robbed. The perp bought a handgun on the streets from an illegal vendor who stole the thing and tried to get rid of the serial number. At the end of his crime, this shameless killer leaned over the counter to shoot the attendant and eliminate the only witness. The only thing that saved the attendant was the handgun he legally owned and fired back at the perp. If handguns had been illegal, the perp would still have had his gun, but the attendant wouldn't have had his and would be dead right now instead of merely injured.

You must mean the East side of DC, specifically the Southeast of DC. The West side of DC is Georgetown and the like.
 
What a joke our Constitution is becoming. The 2nd Amendment, which gives us the crystal-clear right to bear arms, is being neutered, while activist judges contrived a way to wrench a non-existent right to privacy out of it to make abortions Constitutionally protected.
 
This reminds me of an old 'Dice' bit about the banning of smoking in SF when he said "you can smoke a baloney pony in SF but you can't smoke a fucking Marlboro!"

Seriously though, this really sickens me. They can bend over backwards and ignore the voters to appease the queers but then take away one of the most fundamental rights of a US citizen?
 
jimnyc said:
This reminds me of an old 'Dice' bit about the banning of smoking in SF when he said "you can smoke a baloney pony in SF but you can't smoke a fucking Marlboro!"

Seriously though, this really sickens me. They can bend over backwards and ignore the voters to appease the queers but then take away one of the most fundamental rights of a US citizen?

Except in this case, the ban was apparently the will of the majority.
 
Pale Rider said:
A gun is a gun is a gun. But to the liberal sons a bitches slowly but surely disarming America, it's just another step towards TOTAL disarmerment.

I've lived long enough. The day they show up at my door and tell me to hand them over, I'll expect to die, but I'm going to take some with me, and I hope it gives others the courage to do the same.

What the liberals are doing to America absolutely makes my blood boil. They won't be happy until they destroy it.

I was listening to talk radio today, and a caller had a real good idea. He said why don't we send an army of four or five hundred thousand LIBERALS over to Iraq, and let them TALK to all the terrorists that they're SOOOOOO damned sympathetic of, and let THEM handle it from there. Of course the terrorists would KILL them as fast as they could, but that would be GOOD thing.

Not a bad idea.


Maybe ol' San Pervisco turned a new leaf..if they outlawed "Guns" if my memory serves me from Basic Military training...they are referring to "Your gun is for fun-your pistol is to kill" So if they outlawed "Guns" then the "Bathouses" will go broke-Chapter 11 Bankruptcy...this may be a good thing!(Wishful thinking on my part) :)
 
archangel said:
Maybe ol' San Pervisco turned a new leaf..if they outlawed "Guns" if my memory serves me from Basic Military training...they are referring to "Your gun is for fun-your pistol is to kill" So if they outlawed "Guns" then the "Bathouses" will go broke-Chapter 11 Bankruptcy...this may be a good thing!(Wishful thinking on my part) :)

Yeah... "this is my rifle, this is my gun, this is for fighting, this is for fun".

Wouldn't those sorry ass sons a bitches be floored at the Bucket when the Cowboy's are playing arch? They'd SHIT at the sight of all those pistols and knives hanging off people... LMAO!!!
 
Bonnie said:
I think their water must be drugged :wtf:


So now I wonder what happens when a business owner is held up at gun point by a criminal?? Are they supposed to just stand there and get shot, run and get shot? Or can they break out a shotgun and blow the criminals head off then get sued by the criminals next of kin, or maybe get arrested by the cops for defending themselves??
I wonder how this works???

Any liberals who support this ban want to explain how this works????

They banned guns in England, the crime rate soared.

Same thing in Australia.
 
Hobbit said:
Yeah, and my sister goes to college in Fairfax. As a political major, she goes to D.C. every once in a while, but being white on the west side is a death sentence. Cops who find a white guy/girl on the west side of D.C. call for backup, heavy backup if it's night, and escort the poor victim-to-be out of the ghetto. Yep, a gun ban worked really well there.

The second ammendment is not an obselete ammendment designed to allow state militias. It's the constitution's backup plan. It's a failsafe in case the government runs amok, like it is right now. Tyranny cannot subjugate an armed populace as easily as it can an unarmed populace.

Now, I just saw a guy on a "caught on tape" show. He was a gas station attendant who got robbed. The perp bought a handgun on the streets from an illegal vendor who stole the thing and tried to get rid of the serial number. At the end of his crime, this shameless killer leaned over the counter to shoot the attendant and eliminate the only witness. The only thing that saved the attendant was the handgun he legally owned and fired back at the perp. If handguns had been illegal, the perp would still have had his gun, but the attendant wouldn't have had his and would be dead right now instead of merely injured.

Guns saving lives outnumber gun murders by alot. But you rarely hear those stories in the MSM..
 
pegwinn said:
The really nasty part about this is that (back in the 70's or 80's I think) the second amendment was construed to apply only to militias and that the states could do this. I think, but cannot prove, that it was during the brady bill challenges. Personally, if I ever visit the land of fruits and nuts again, I will be armed. If caught, my retirement check will go to some lawyers mortgage. If I don't make the papers.

Land of fruits and nuts, yea, but they are all imported. :)
 
Abbey Normal said:
What a joke our Constitution is becoming. The 2nd Amendment, which gives us the crystal-clear right to bear arms, is being neutered, while activist judges contrived a way to wrench a non-existent right to privacy out of it to make abortions Constitutionally protected.

I have been saying this for a long time now, as well as predicting the doom of Europe over the next 50 years, to the muslims,....

we are a nation of laws, but the law no longer eminates from the Constitution. It is merely a figurehead, a meaningless document, what makes it meaningless anymore is the courts decision that it is a "living and breathing" document, which is a bunch of horse shit,,,unless we get enough strict original intent justices on the Supreme court, for a looooong time, it will remain a worthless document.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top