Well now, how much cooler than April is May going to be?

[skookerasbil]

Nothing's cooler than April.

LMAO

 

[Marion Morrison]

Nothing's cooler than April.

I take checks.

 

[Billy_Bob]

But here, the OP makes fun of a 0.1 - 0.2 drop in temperature as insignificant. So we should be alarmed by insignificant increases but also disregard insignificant decreases.

Its a far larger drop than that...

Its been almost a full deg C. drop as of 5/31/18

 

[flacaltenn]

We have our brainless set constantly predicting, and even stating, that we are in a cooling period. So, is May going to be +0.1 or +0.2 degrees cooler than April? LOL Should find out before the week is over. So tell me, Silly Billy, Mr. Westwall, how much cooler is May going to be than April? LOL I am going with +0.1, around +0.3 for the anomaly on the UAH graph.

Why didn't you just go get the May number from UAH? It's down. 0.03DegC from April.. Is THAT all you wanted to know?? YOUR fortune telling was WAY off -- wasn't it?

And entering a Solar Minimum is NOT the sort of thing you'd start seeing for a couple years at least. Earth's climate system has too much thermal inertia to change on a dime for ANYTHING. Not even a 10ppm change in CO2 overnight.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Too Funny... Old Crock ran away .....

UAH Global Temperature Update for May, 2018: +0.18 deg. C « Roy Spencer, PhD


The great pause is now 21 years 5 months....

 

[Crick]

UAH's running average is about +0.35 and far more climatically meaningful than May's temperature. The average back in 1970 was -0.3. So 0.65C increase in 46 years or +0.1416C/decade. Temperature in 2100 at that rate will be up 1.45C from the baseline on the UAH graph, certainly NOT a "pause". And, of course, this is UAH global lower atmosphere, NOT a proper global temperature.

Land/Ocean data show an increase of almost a full centigrade degree since 1970.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Crick writes,

"UAH's running average is about +0.35 and far more climatically meaningful than May's temperature. The average back in 1970 was -0.3. So 0.65C increase in 46 years or +0.1416C/decade. Temperature in 2100 at that rate will be up 1.45C from the baseline on the UAH graph, certainly NOT a "pause". And, of course, this is UAH global lower atmosphere, NOT a proper global temperature."

In your rush to fight the "pause" argument, you unwittingly destroyed the long running warmist arguments. The IPCC in the last two reports tell us it should warm AT LEAST .30C Per Decade, while YOU show it is warming about HALF that rate.

Anyone still posting PISSTemp loses credibility as it is the WORST dataset of the bunch. They eliminated the well known cooling from the early 1940's to the late 1970's. You keep ignoring this over and over because you have no interest in accuracy.

 

[Crick]

UAH's lower atmospheric temperature, as I stated, is NOT the global temperature. Global temperature has risen from +0.6C since 2000. That is greater than 0.3C/decade and certainly no "pause".

 

[Billy_Bob]

UAH's running average is about +0.35 and far more climatically meaningful than May's temperature. The average back in 1970 was -0.3. So 0.65C increase in 46 years or +0.1416C/decade. Temperature in 2100 at that rate will be up 1.45C from the baseline on the UAH graph, certainly NOT a "pause". And, of course, this is UAH global lower atmosphere, NOT a proper global temperature.

Land/Ocean data show an increase of almost a full centigrade degree since 1970.

Once again you use the highly adjusted Karl Et Al garbage while UAH and balloon data sets tell us it is nothing more than garbage....

 

[Billy_Bob]

UAH's lower atmospheric temperature, as I stated, is NOT the global temperature. Global temperature has risen from +0.6C since 2000. That is greater than 0.3C/decade and certainly no "pause".

IF you knew anything about UAH you would know it has 10 different levels in altitude. But again you are clueless... 10 meters IS surface temp..

 

[Sunsettommy]

UAH's lower atmospheric temperature, as I stated, is NOT the global temperature. Global temperature has risen from +0.6C since 2000. That is greater than 0.3C/decade and certainly no "pause".

IF you knew anything about UAH you would know it has 10 different levels in altitude. But again you are clueless... 10 meters IS surface temp..

The man is truly lost in the AGW bullcrap to make comically stupid statements.

 

[Sunsettommy]

UAH's lower atmospheric temperature, as I stated, is NOT the global temperature. Global temperature has risen from +0.6C since 2000. That is greater than 0.3C/decade and certainly no "pause".

You are a freaking liar since UAH covers most of the worlds surface areas, terrestrial and Ocean.

and from Dr. Spencer's blogsite:

It is GLOBAL as he and the official UAH map and chart shows.

 

[Crick]

Lower atmosphere is lower atmosphere dipshit. It doesn't include the upper atmosphere and it doesn't include the oceans. The only one who believes Spencer's numbers are relevant is Spencer.

Official UAH... that's rich. Please explain why neither NASA Goddard, NWS, NCDC, Hadley, JMA nor any other national agency producing global data accept UAH as the be-all and end-all of global temperatures.

 

[skookerasbil]

Lower atmosphere is lower atmosphere dipshit. It doesn't include the upper atmosphere and it doesn't include the oceans. The only one who believes Spencer's numbers are relevant is Spencer.

Official UAH... that's rich. Please explain why neither NASA Goddard, NWS, NCDC, Hadley, JMA nor any other national agency producing global data accept UAH as the be-all and end-all of global temperatures.

The temps are decreasing s0n.... time to buckle up your chin strap and accept it!

Oh....and regarding the whole who's data is valid debate?

Basketball people have been debating in recent weeks about the greatness of LeBron James vs other great players who have played before him. It's a great debate but that's all it is....a bunch of subjective opinions. Same with the climate change debate.... they should have a radio show for you climate obsessed folks to go back and forth. Hang up the phone and spike the football!!

But just like the gun control debate, that's all it is.... a lot of talk. Psychological babble. Exactly like the climate change debate.... babble. Year after year nothing changes..... for all the data you cite a billion times the policymakers couldnt possibly care any less. You may think the science is decided but just like the guy who is convinced LeBron James is the greatest ever, in the end it's nothing more than just a fun debate topic!!

 

[expat_panama]

...I am going with +0.1, around +0.3 for the anomaly on the UAH graph...

...You alarmists NEVER define "warmer" in your posts in temperature data...

When we bake a cake we heat the oven to 300°F; the cookbook NEVER says "heat to +50 anomaly".

Reality is that the earth cools every year from Jan. to Jul. while it moves 3 million miles further away from the sun and get's 11 petawatts less solar energy. Talking science is clear and straightforward but this AGW politics cr@p is for loonies.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

We have our brainless set constantly predicting, and even stating, that we are in a cooling period. So, is May going to be +0.1 or +0.2 degrees cooler than April? LOL Should find out before the week is over. So tell me, Silly Billy, Mr. Westwall, how much cooler is May going to be than April? LOL I am going with +0.1, around +0.3 for the anomaly on the UAH graph.

Uh....It generally gets warmer as we move into the summer.

 

[Crick]

Global temperatures. Northern and Southern hemispheres in opposite seasons. You know.

 

[expat_panama]

...It generally gets warmer as we move into the summer.

If your "it" is the earth, and "we" is those of us in the north, then your post is not true. The Earth gets cooler from Jan. to July as the earth gets farther from the sun--

Global temperatures. Northern and Southern hemispheres in opposite seasons. You know.

--and still the earth as a whole gets cooler in July.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Lower atmosphere is lower atmosphere dipshit. It doesn't include the upper atmosphere and it doesn't include the oceans. The only one who believes Spencer's numbers are relevant is Spencer.

Official UAH... that's rich. Please explain why neither NASA Goddard, NWS, NCDC, Hadley, JMA nor any other national agency producing global data accept UAH as the be-all and end-all of global temperatures.

Your ignorance knows no bounds since the Troposphere STARTS at the surface of the planet going upward as shown here below from Wikipedia

"The troposphere is the lowest layer of Earth's atmosphere, and is also where nearly all weather conditions take place. It contains approximately 75% of the atmosphere's mass and 99% of the total mass of water vapor and aerosols.[2] The average depths of the troposphere are 18 km (11 mi) in the tropics, 17 km (11 mi) in the mid latitudes, and 6 km (3.7 mi) in the polar regions in winter. The lowest part of the troposphere, where friction with the Earth's surface influences air flow, is the planetary boundary layer. This layer is typically a few hundred meters to 2 km (1.2 mi) deep depending on the landform and time of day."

From UCAR:

UAH coverage starts right next to the surface and covers most of the globe, since the Lower Atmosphere which starts at the surface going upward also covers the Ocean surfaces.

From Wikipedia:

"Satellite temperature measurements are inferences of the temperature of the atmosphere at various altitudes as well as sea and land surface temperatures obtained from radiometric measurements by satellites."

Satellites do cover most of the global surface areas except right at the Polar regions.

 

[Crick]

You haven't explained why none of the world's meteorological agencies use UAH for global temperature. Why doesn't Spencer label it "global temperature"?

Cause it ain't.