Welfare is Immoral

Lasher

Rookie
Aug 31, 2010
826
43
0
It is immoral for a government to tell its most productive people that they must give up part of their lives and property for the benefit of other people who don't have as many resources as those of us who have worked hard and made successful lives for ourselves just because those others have refused to avail themselves of all the benefits this great country has offered them in the way of education, freedom to pursue their dreams, etc.

Charity is intrinsically a voluntary thing, not something forced on us at the point of a gun by government thugs who have the authority to ultimately kill us for resisting their theft of our property. Taking one man's hard-earned money against his will for the benefit of another man's welfare is definitely not charity, it is the crime of robbery that is dictated by an arrogant and tyrannical government.

Every citizen of this country has the potential ability to carve out a decent, comfortable life for himself by utilizing all the facilities offered up by the benevolence of the productive, taxpaying workers who are forced to subsidize the educational, medical, legal, and other needs of the underclasses who refuse to take responsibility for their own lives as long as they don't have to due to our rulers providing them with all they need and want by stealing from us.
 
Da JJJOOOOOSSSSSS must be behind it huh fuckhead!

It is immoral for a government to tell its most productive people that they must give up part of their lives and property for the benefit of other people who don't have as many resources as those of us who have worked hard and made successful lives for ourselves just because those others have refused to avail themselves of all the benefits this great country has offered them in the way of education, freedom to pursue their dreams, etc.

Charity is intrinsically a voluntary thing, not something forced on us at the point of a gun by government thugs who have the authority to ultimately kill us for resisting their theft of our property. Taking one man's hard-earned money against his will for the benefit of another man's welfare is definitely not charity, it is the crime of robbery that is dictated by an arrogant and tyrannical government.

Every citizen of this country has the potential ability to carve out a decent, comfortable life for himself by utilizing all the facilities offered up by the benevolence of the productive, taxpaying workers who are forced to subsidize the educational, medical, legal, and other needs of the underclasses who refuse to take responsibility for their own lives as long as they don't have to due to our rulers providing them with all they need and want by stealing from us.
 
It is immoral for a government to tell its most productive people that they must give up part of their lives and property for the benefit of other people who don't have as many resources as those of us who have worked hard and made successful lives for ourselves just because those others have refused to avail themselves of all the benefits this great country has offered them in the way of education, freedom to pursue their dreams, etc.

Charity is intrinsically a voluntary thing, not something forced on us at the point of a gun by government thugs who have the authority to ultimately kill us for resisting their theft of our property. Taking one man's hard-earned money against his will for the benefit of another man's welfare is definitely not charity, it is the crime of robbery that is dictated by an arrogant and tyrannical government.

Every citizen of this country has the potential ability to carve out a decent, comfortable life for himself by utilizing all the facilities offered up by the benevolence of the productive, taxpaying workers who are forced to subsidize the educational, medical, legal, and other needs of the underclasses who refuse to take responsibility for their own lives as long as they don't have to due to our rulers providing them with all they need and want by stealing from us.

"Every citizen of this country has the potential ability to carve out a decent, comfortable life for himself "


except of course for those people who are unemployed because there aren't enough jobs to go around.

I can imagine a world in the future in which computers, robots, machines do almost all of the work....

resulting in massive unemployment...40%? 50%? 70? 80?...you?

and I don't want 250 million people whining about poverty or demanding that the few extremely wealthy multibillionaires in America who EARNED all of their wealth being forced to pay pennies or nickels just to feed lazy and irresponsible welfare cheats and deadbeats!


America won't be TRULY great until ALL of the wealth is in the hands of a few elitists and everyone else is eating out of garbage cans!
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: blu
It's sort of funny..that one mild post brought every ignorant liberal extremist on the board running.
 
Charity is intrinsically a voluntary thing, not something forced on us at the point of a gun by government thugs who have the authority to ultimately kill us for resisting their theft of our property. Taking one man's hard-earned money against his will for the benefit of another man's welfare is definitely not charity, it is the crime of robbery that is dictated by an arrogant and tyrannical government.
I haven't seen evidence that the government can or will kill a person for not paying taxes, but yes, forced charity is morally wrong, while voluntary charity is one of the most admirable of human qualities.
Government forcing one to support others with his own earned labor is intrinsically as wrong as theft on the street or in the neighborhood. It's government stealing your energy and your labor for their own use as they deem fit.
 
Lasher is posted a Rorschach Test.

Responsible individuals agree with it - Moonbats have a hissy fit.
 
Bah, Humbug, I tell you. Are there no workhouses for the poor to go to? Humbug, I say.


Now why go to work when you can get section 8 housing and welfare. Poor sharon jasper, its such a tough life living in her slum



sharonjasper.jpg
 
Last edited:
I guess Hoover dam was a bad idea?

It is now providing welfare finianced water and electricity to Vegas and southern CA.
 
For everyone disagrees with Welfare, please tell me about the program. Tell me about what one has to do while on Tanff if they do not have a medical exemption? Tell me how many hours they have to put in for job search, and how much time they actually have in their LIFETIME to live on Tanff.
Also tell me how cutting childcare coverage during the Bush years helped people find jobs?
 
For everyone disagrees with Welfare, please tell me about the program. Tell me about what one has to do while on Tanff if they do not have a medical exemption? Tell me how many hours they have to put in for job search, and how much time they actually have in their LIFETIME to live on Tanff.
Also tell me how cutting childcare coverage during the Bush years helped people find jobs?

That is simple, cutting child care benefits caused them to have to find better paying jobs so they could pay for higher priced childcare and pay more taxes.

See everyone wins ;)
 
Charity is intrinsically a voluntary thing, not something forced on us at the point of a gun by government thugs who have the authority to ultimately kill us for resisting their theft of our property. Taking one man's hard-earned money against his will for the benefit of another man's welfare is definitely not charity, it is the crime of robbery that is dictated by an arrogant and tyrannical government.
I haven't seen evidence that the government can or will kill a person for not paying taxes, but yes, forced charity is morally wrong, while voluntary charity is one of the most admirable of human qualities.
Government forcing one to support others with his own earned labor is intrinsically as wrong as theft on the street or in the neighborhood. It's government stealing your energy and your labor for their own use as they deem fit.
No one ever asked government to take on the task of charity. There used to be a time where private entities/individuals used to do this. And it worked just FINE.

That is until the 16th Amendment came into being courtesy of the Socialist Do-gooders in Government that thought they knew better.

Government has used it as a WEAPON against the people ever since.

It's high time it ceased.
 
Charity is intrinsically a voluntary thing, not something forced on us at the point of a gun by government thugs who have the authority to ultimately kill us for resisting their theft of our property. Taking one man's hard-earned money against his will for the benefit of another man's welfare is definitely not charity, it is the crime of robbery that is dictated by an arrogant and tyrannical government.
I haven't seen evidence that the government can or will kill a person for not paying taxes, but yes, forced charity is morally wrong, while voluntary charity is one of the most admirable of human qualities.
Government forcing one to support others with his own earned labor is intrinsically as wrong as theft on the street or in the neighborhood. It's government stealing your energy and your labor for their own use as they deem fit.
No one ever asked government to take on the task of charity. There used to be a time where private entities/individuals used to do this. And it worked just FINE.

That is until the 16th Amendment came into being courtesy of the Socialist Do-gooders in Government that thought they knew better.

Government has used it as a WEAPON against the people ever since.

It's high time it ceased.
It worked just fine for the people they helped, not for the people they were not able to help.
 

Forum List

Back
Top