Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by cereal_killer, Jul 30, 2012.
Logic doesn't use strawmen. Didn't deny the disruption purpose I see.
First of all, you 'remind' me not to 'insult' anyone - when I hadn't actually insulted anyone... now you point out a 'fuck'. Oh, shit, I shouldn't have written fuck...
Not Allowed Here.
No, all the mods have been very supportive so far. But when there is such a dedicated effort to disrespect, ridicule, dismiss, or hold in contempt the concept of the CDZ and those who are trying to find their land legs here, I'm sure there are people who will take that to heart and stay away rather than incur the sharp tongues of those who will accuse, ridicule, or insult them elsewhere even if they are part of a group and not named specifically.
Disruptive is the wrong term. Should be trolling.
Posts reported as required in the rules section.
Maybe I just have a 'different' understanding of the word 'debate'. Debate, generally means one voices an opinion, someone else voices a differing opinion, each provides academically sound sources to demonstrate the validity of their view.... etc etc etc. Since when is starting a thread with 'Willard 'the rat' Mitt Romney considered a 'debate' title? It's provocative and yet no one can call that poster out on that. Another starts a thread with a question and a link to the HuffPuff - hardly an unbiased 'source'.... and she does't even bother to opine on the linked article.
It's not 'debate', Foxy. It's laughable.
I can't tell you how devastated I am.
Oh, gee.... Edited.
I understand having to abide by rules your unaccustomed to can be quite difficult.
I like the idea of a place to just talk without having to worry about the usual.
Separate names with a comma.