- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,450
- 1,823
- 205
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, God forbid a company be successful.
Comrade, if we're going to be socialist no matter what, I'd rather spend money on universal healthcare and subsidized day care. Not on fat cat wall street tycoons.
Bernie Sanders had a good point. He said if Companies are too big to be allowed to fail, then they're too big to be allowed to exist. I think its a good idea to revisit anti-trust laws, and cut up some of these mega corporations into smaller pieces.
Don't get me wrong here, the basic tennants of business in this country have been thrown out the window. So what I am saying is this, if the govt. is spending money on a "failed" business, then from a logic standpoint it makes no sense to justify not spending it on the same people your borrowing it from. However, when a business is successful and gets so large to the point that it effects a nations economy then the part where it effects the nations economy is the fault of those whos job it is to regulate commerce i.e. the people you and I elect to do it. If a company fails then they should fail, period no matter how painful that may be. IMO why even have bankruptcy laws if your going backstop every business. When a faling business is allowed to fail that creates a void for others to come into to fill. That seems to be a concept many have forgotten.
Its far easier, and less painful to just have better anti-trust laws, that won't allow companies to be so big that we can't allow them to fail, without causing widespread panic and economic pain.
That's the boom and bust cycle we spend 130 years trying to dig out of.
If they get so big, they we "can't" allow them to fail, without causing economic devastation, yes then they are too big.
Exactly. They want to subsidize private debt and make it the responsibility of the taxpayers to pay off the mortgages that a group of irresponsible, ignorant buyers took out and were unable to pay back. I want both of these men to fuck off and die if they think it's my responsibility to cover the asses of these ignorant fucks.
Yes, God forbid a company be successful.
no, this time she is right, if they are too big to fail they should not be allowed to exist. cause that mean our dimes not theirs.
But again, the only reason AIG failed was because of irresponsible behavior from inside. Most large corporations aren't that fucking stupid.
Navy, I think a more appropriate title for this thread is "Socialist STATE of America." The way socialists like Obama operate, we won't need state borders anymore. They'll pass everything on a national level and make state legislatures obsolete.
But again, the only reason AIG failed was because of irresponsible behavior from inside. Most large corporations aren't that fucking stupid.
Its a damn shame that anti-trust laws have been so weakened by conservatives, that mega corporations basically can control our government and demand we bail them out.
Navy, I think a more appropriate title for this thread is "Socialist STATE of America." The way socialists like Obama operate, we won't need state borders anymore. They'll pass everything on a national level and make state legislatures obsolete.
WTF are you talking about, and how old are you?
We've been bailing out large corporations since the 1980s, because if they failed, it was deemed that it would be a body blow to the economy. Its a damn shame that anti-trust laws have been so weakened by conservatives, that mega corporations basically can control our government and demand we bail them out.
Fuck that. There's a reason progressives and liberals built anti-trust laws in the early 20th century.
Bull fucking shit, every time the Republicans tried to intervene and stop this shit Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and a whole host of other money grubbing Democrats including Obamalama blocked them. So, bullfuckingshit.