We will never convince the deniers.

[Crepitus]

We will never convince the deniers. Giant world wide conspiracy theories are fun and exciting to think about. Slowly changing climates, where the action happens over years or even decades, just can't compete with that for entertainment value.
Then there is the feeling of belonging these socially handicapped tRumpkins get from high-fiving each other every time they think they've scored some sort of point. For instance the 2 dozen or so threads that were started about the polar vortex disruptions last week.

And finally there's the way these things are presented to them, as if they are some kinda privileged information that only a chosen few get to know. It makes them feel (falsely) superior to everyone else, even if only for a few minutes, and that can be a powerful thing if you suffer from low self esteem like the vast majority of these nut-bars do.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How many trillions do we need to waste...err...invest in windmills, to make sure the climate never ever changes?

 

[TNHarley]

Climate change might not slow ocean circulation as much as thought
We dont know shit. Stop being such assholes.

 

[Likkmee]

UNTIL Bring LOTSA cold beer

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[danielpalos]

How many trillions do we need to waste...err...invest in windmills, to make sure the climate never ever changes?

it is about finding modern technology solutions not modern management excuses.

 

[Crepitus]

I want you folks who are proving my point over and over to know i appreciate your help.

Keep up the good work!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I want you folks who are proving my point over and over to know i appreciate your help.

Keep up the good work!!

No problem, spend whatever you need, don't worry about showing actual results, eh?

 

[Crick]

How many trillions do we need to waste...err...invest in windmills, to make sure the climate never ever changes?

A great deal less than we will pay moving hundreds of millions of people away from the coastlines.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How many trillions do we need to waste...err...invest in windmills, to make sure the climate never ever changes?

A great deal less than we will pay moving hundreds of millions of people away from the coastlines.

So $50 trillion will make the climate static? $100 trillion?
How will we know when we can stop wasting...err...investing?

 

[Votto]

Climate change might not slow ocean circulation as much as thought
We dont know shit. Stop being such assholes.

You don't get it, do you?

Anyone who disagrees with the Left hates or denies science cuz only they alone believe in science............unless it comes down to explaining why they fight nuclear energy, which is the only viable form of energy that produces enough energy needed for society and is carbon free.

Then all of a sudden they don't like science.

Funny that.

No, they just want big pots of money, courtesy of carbon taxes.

 

[Crick]

How will carbon taxes put big pots of money in the pockets of liberals?

PS, though I favor nuclear power myself, I think you will find distrust of that technology transcends political divisions.

 

[MisterBeale]

I want you folks who are proving my point over and over to know i appreciate your help.

Keep up the good work!!

 

[Crepitus]

I want you folks who are proving my point over and over to know i appreciate your help.

Keep up the good work!!

How nice for you.

 

[MisterBeale]

Climate change might not slow ocean circulation as much as thought
We dont know shit. Stop being such assholes.

You don't get it, do you?

Anyone who disagrees with the Left hates or denies science cuz only they alone believe in science............unless it comes down to explaining why they fight nuclear energy, which is the only viable form of energy that produces enough energy needed for society and is carbon free.

Then all of a sudden they don't like science.

Funny that.

No, they just want big pots of money, courtesy of carbon taxes.

 

[MisterBeale]

How will carbon taxes put big pots of money in the pockets of liberals?

PS, though I favor nuclear power myself, I think you will find distrust of that technology transcends political divisions.

Not just liberals; Big government elites.

Neo-cons and Neo-liberals globally.

But mostly for Global Socialists.

UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism
UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism

". . . In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive sector will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes — not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely through domestic socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.

Wealth redistribution alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize control of the means of production — either directly or through fascist-style mandates. “We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services,” the document states. It also says that “governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns … to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production. . . ”

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform

 

[Crick]

How will carbon taxes put big pots of money in the pockets of liberals?

PS, though I favor nuclear power myself, I think you will find distrust of that technology transcends political divisions.

Not just liberals; Big government elites.

Neo-cons and Neo-liberals globally.

But mostly for Global Socialists.

UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism
UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism

". . . In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive sector will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes — not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely through domestic socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.

Wealth redistribution alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize control of the means of production — either directly or through fascist-style mandates. “We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services,” the document states. It also says that “governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns … to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production. . . ”

The article to which you link is complete bullshit. Read it and look for actual evidence - actual quotes - that the UN document says anything like what the author claims it says.

 

[MisterBeale]

How will carbon taxes put big pots of money in the pockets of liberals?

PS, though I favor nuclear power myself, I think you will find distrust of that technology transcends political divisions.

Not just liberals; Big government elites.

Neo-cons and Neo-liberals globally.

But mostly for Global Socialists.

UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism
UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism

". . . In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive sector will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes — not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely through domestic socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.

Wealth redistribution alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize control of the means of production — either directly or through fascist-style mandates. “We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services,” the document states. It also says that “governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns … to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production. . . ”

The article to which you link is complete bullshit. Read it and look for actual evidence - actual quotes - that the UN document says anything like what the author claims it says.

DUDE, the article I quoted from, QUOTED the document, and I GAVE you a link where you can download the document for yourself.

The entire forum can now see what a disingenuous liar you are.

Here are the QUOTES, from the document that I quoted, in the article;

“We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services,”

“governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns … to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production. . ”

Every intelligent person in the nation knows what the hell your agenda is, and they know what is going on. They don't want to be a party to your wealth redistribution program, with the globalist bureaucrats, yourself included, taking a cut of the pie, based on this scam along the way.


The jig is up buddy. YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED.

 

[Crick]

You're an idiot if you think that says what the author says it says.

 

[MisterBeale]

You're an idiot if you think that says what the author says it says.