We should send all US terror suspects to GITMO?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by uscitizen, Jun 17, 2011.

  1. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    According to our lead Republican we should send all US terror suspects to GITMO.

    Where will it end?
     
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,517
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,928
    Supreme Court already ruled on that. Would require an act of Congress to change. We are in a WAR. And if we want to win we have to quit excusing the instigators of said war.
     
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    We have no declared war going on.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    I guess some actual quote from whoever this mystery 'lead Republican' is above usc's intellectual paygrade.
     
  5. dblack
    Offline

    dblack Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    20,119
    Thanks Received:
    2,006
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,766
    I see. War. So, once we invade them, take over their capitol and they surrender, all will be fine and dandy?

    The terrorism problem isn't a war, but if you insist on calling it one, it's the stupidest war imaginable. We're letting the 'other side' dictate the terms and basically committing to remain at war as long as there is anyone out there who intends to do us harm. In other words, perpetually. Why do you want to let them set the terms?
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2011
  6. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Mitch 'Bush's bitch' Mconnel.
    Google it.
     
  7. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Yep a bit of a problem with terrorists in the USA , their capitol is our capitol.
     
  8. Truthseeker420
    Offline

    Truthseeker420 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    10,365
    Thanks Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Home of the 2013 BCS National Champion
    Ratings:
    +1,026
    Bush better move to Saudi Arabia.
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,517
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,928
    Bush didn't say it. And I repeat, the Supreme Court already ruled on this issue. Simply won't happen. Not without an act of Congress.

    As long as we are going to get our knickers in a twist for what someone says... Obama said he wanted to make coal, natural gas and oil cost so much only the rich could afford to use it. I don't recall any outrage by you leftoid dumb asses.
     
  10. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

    George Orwell
     

Share This Page