We Should NOT Have Let Sadr Live

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Annie, Aug 4, 2006.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    It seemed like a good idea at the time. :coffee3:

    http://www.meforum.org/article/655

     
  2. onedomino
    Offline

    onedomino SCE to AUX

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Thanks Received:
    474
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +476
    Two can play Iran's game. We should fund and arm the Kurds that live in Northwestern Iran.
     
  3. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    At this point I'm not so sure. It would be another front, upsetting both Iran and Turkey.
     
  4. onedomino
    Offline

    onedomino SCE to AUX

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Thanks Received:
    474
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +476
    Iran must be made to realize that there is too big a price to pay when it funds terrorism against America and its allies (whoever they might be at this juncture). Where is the USS Vincennes when we need it? It was the ship that blew away the Iranian airbus. Supporting the Kurds would deliver our message loud and clear. Right now, the Iranians think that they can do whatever they want (especially through their (Hez)Ebola proxy. Regarding Turkey, the population of that country is virulently anti-American. The Turkish press routinely lies about American activities, making up atrocities that we have supposedly performed and printing the lies in their newspapers. I would tell the Turks that unless they change their foreign policy we will fund the Kurds and oppose their membership in the EU (right now, we support their membership; probably because it upsets France so much). The Kurds were screwed by early 20th century English cartographers, who drew Middle East boundaries without regard to the cultures living in the region. Much of the Middle East mess is a function of having to clean up after English and French colonial crashes.
     
  5. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770

    I agree with all you say. We have a large army, able to become much larger if necessity warrants. However, most do not want that. I don't see that we will be opening fronts as much as answering them. Iran may soon be the exception, though how it will become so, remains unclear to me. No doubt they need to be dealt with, but we are not willing to do so, yet.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    Let's see...

    First Sadddam had to go because he had nuclear weapons or something. Or, wait - no, it was because he wasn't democratic. Right. Or something - what did Bush say? Now he's gone. But now what rises after the secular leader goes - a popular figure supported by the masses - also must go. But not, obviously, because he has "weapons of mass destruction". Nor could it be because he's not "democratic," because, in the strict sense of the word, he is, because a majority support him.

    What's the goddamn goal here, again?
     
  7. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    I think it was to start wiping out Islamo-terrorists and countries that train and finance them.
     

Share This Page