We should no longer call them liberals. It's an insult to the term. What's a proper description?

While "liberals" claim to a liberal ideology, the effort is no more than misdirection. Sure, liberalism created this country. It was independent of political affiliation. I remind you the Republicans freed the slaves.

Liberalism was represented by MLK. The only true "liberals" on the side of Democrats are elderly. They actually stood for something that was right. But today's "liberal" stands for no more than hatred, decay, racism, fabrications, excuses, weakness, and twisted ideas assaulting mother nature and rational behavior. Look at the results.

Meanwhile, today's conservatives are more liberal than "liberals". This should be quite obvious, from our education system to the media to politicians.

From the Constitution, to demanding how other's think to selling out our country for free-flowing ideology, libs show deep resentment for our country, and they want it broken. They do this in words and certainly action.

They aren't progressives, because progressive implies progress. Men using the women's bathroom is progress? How did they pull that out of their butts? Reducing everyone down to the lowest common denominator is progress? What's occurring in Ca. is ironic. There's an exodus of the middle class leaving the wealthy and poor. Meanwhile, they suggest it's conservatives who are illiterate and would push us back into the dark ages. How many of you "liberals" understand the irony and why?

Point being, the disaster that's become the Democrat party are under false labels (go figure). What is a proper label for these people? Try to be nice.


Fabian socialists or commies....either one works.
 
Leftarded fascists.

Tarded is no good. They use Trumptards anyway, and we shouldn't insult the handicapped retarded. They're often happy and courteous.
I appreciate that you defend the developmentally disabled, but don't pretend repubs in general do. "Libtard" has always been a popular term on this forum and elsewhere.

Tell me again about "rightards"?

Greg
While "liberals" claim to a liberal ideology, the effort is no more than misdirection. Sure, liberalism created this country. It was independent of political affiliation. I remind you the Republicans freed the slaves.

Liberalism was represented by MLK. The only true "liberals" on the side of Democrats are elderly. They actually stood for something that was right. But today's "liberal" stands for no more than hatred, decay, racism, fabrications, excuses, weakness, and twisted ideas assaulting mother nature and rational behavior. Look at the results.

Meanwhile, today's conservatives are more liberal than "liberals". This should be quite obvious, from our education system to the media to politicians.

From the Constitution, to demanding how other's think to selling out our country for free-flowing ideology, libs show deep resentment for our country, and they want it broken. They do this in words and certainly action.

They aren't progressives, because progressive implies progress. Men using the women's bathroom is progress? How did they pull that out of their butts? Reducing everyone down to the lowest common denominator is progress? What's occurring in Ca. is ironic. There's an exodus of the middle class leaving the wealthy and poor. Meanwhile, they suggest it's conservatives who are illiterate and would push us back into the dark ages. How many of you "liberals" understand the irony and why?

Point being, the disaster that's become the Democrat party are under false labels (go figure). What is a proper label for these people? Try to be nice.

Are these traits because they are liberals? Or just not nice people?

I could never think as a fundamentally violent person as "nice".

Greg
 
While "liberals" claim to a liberal ideology, the effort is no more than misdirection. Sure, liberalism created this country. It was independent of political affiliation. I remind you the Republicans freed the slaves.

Liberalism was represented by MLK. The only true "liberals" on the side of Democrats are elderly. They actually stood for something that was right. But today's "liberal" stands for no more than hatred, decay, racism, fabrications, excuses, weakness, and twisted ideas assaulting mother nature and rational behavior. Look at the results.

Meanwhile, today's conservatives are more liberal than "liberals". This should be quite obvious, from our education system to the media to politicians.

From the Constitution, to demanding how other's think to selling out our country for free-flowing ideology, libs show deep resentment for our country, and they want it broken. They do this in words and certainly action.

They aren't progressives, because progressive implies progress. Men using the women's bathroom is progress? How did they pull that out of their butts? Reducing everyone down to the lowest common denominator is progress? What's occurring in Ca. is ironic. There's an exodus of the middle class leaving the wealthy and poor. Meanwhile, they suggest it's conservatives who are illiterate and would push us back into the dark ages. How many of you "liberals" understand the irony and why?

Point being, the disaster that's become the Democrat party are under false labels (go figure). What is a proper label for these people? Try to be nice.

Are these traits because they are liberals? Or just not nice people?

Varies.
 
Last edited:
- ...change brings with it inherent risks, sometimes fatal risks

I should remind you that no nation in history has successfully undergone radical 'progressive' change WRT societal values and behavior and survived the transition. Being blind to the lessons of the past because the effects are not conceived in your meager life span is a worse mistake than remaining stagnant.

Modern "progressivism" promotes the expansion of hedonism, and hedonism unbalanced destroys.
 
upload_2017-8-5_10-24-38.png
 
No no no, I'm trying to be nice. Snowflakes is pretty good though. Stregio has a nice ring to it though.

How about the Disconcerts?
/----/ Snowflake is so effective that when they get angry they call conservatives Snowflake
 
elitist Coastalcocksucker-RottingCity-Asshole-Bolsheviks.

e-CRABs

Their acolytes (and their primary victims) are the poorest educated of Americans--1) Blacks, particularly in the rotting cities controlled by Democrats for half a century where all the Payola goes to half-literate members of Teachers Unions and Public Employee Unions; and 2) Hispanics, many who can't speak the official language; and 3) they also enjoy overwhelming support from people who can't make up their mind whether or not they want a penis or a vagina---but when they decide, they expect the American Tax Payers to pay for what they want---either cut one off, sew one on, or dig one out.
 
elitist Coastalcocksucker-RottingCity-Asshole-Bolsheviks.

e-CRABs

Their acolytes (and their primary victims) are the poorest educated of Americans--1) Blacks, particularly in the rotting cities controlled by Democrats for half a century where all the Payola goes to half-literate members of Teachers Unions and Public Employee Unions; and 2) Hispanics, many who can't speak the official language; and 3) they also enjoy overwhelming support from people who can't make up their mind whether or not they want a penis or a vagina---but when they decide, they expect the American Tax Payers to pay for what they want---either cut one off, sew one on, or dig one out.



Get off the fence, Mac.....say what you really mean.
 

Forum List

Back
Top