We must restore constitutional government

[Rigby5]

Wrong. Buying an XBox to play games is stupid because you already need a computer for the internet...

You sound highly knowledgeable when it comes to technology

I am, I have worked for Intel, IBM, HP, Sequent, and many other computer companies, including game companies .

And yet you just claimed you “need” a computer for the internet (when one can access it via a game console, iPad, and many other devices).

If you worked for any of those companies, you did so as a janitor

That is silly because game consoles, iPads, smartphones, etc., all have cpu processors and are computers, except have limitations in terms of accessories like keyboard and mouse, which operating systems you can install, etc.
A general purpose computer is vastly superior, easier to maintain, more adaptable, and easier to use.
There is hardly and savings by going with a special purpose and limited game console, tablet, smartphone, etc.
The larger the desktop computer, the easier it is to use and update as necessary.
I do not even like laptops, because they are so hard to open, and you have to replace the heatsink heat conducting paste every couple of years. They also can't easily have their video processor upgraded.
Face it, large desktop console computers are the best way to do for all computer uses, including gaming.

 

[miketx]

“We must restore constitutional government”

Such is the ignorant nonsense of the TPM and others on the ridiculous right.

The United States is currently functioning under Constitutional government, nothing needs to be ‘restored’ – the notion is moronic, baseless idiocy.

The Federal government is functioning as intended by the Founding Generation: a Constitutional Republic whose citizens are subject solely to the rule of law, not men – as men are incapable of ruling justly.

A Federal government afforded by the Constitution powers both expressed and implied (McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)).

A Federal government whose laws are supreme, where the Supreme Court determines what the Constitution means, as authorized by the doctrine of Judicial Review and Articles III and VI of the Constitution, and where rulings by the Supreme Court become the law of the land, binding on the states and local jurisdictions, who have no ‘right’ to ‘nullify’ or ‘ignore’ Federal law or the rulings of Federal courts (Cooper v. Aaron (1958)).

That conservatives, libertarians, and members of the TPM disagree with Supreme Court decisions because those rulings might conflict with errant, wrongheaded conservative dogma is of no consequence and devoid of merit.

Lying foreign spy.

 

[Rigby5]

For those of you that are profoundly ignorant of the US Constitution (danielpalos, JoeB131, C_Clayton_Jones, etc.) it is time to educate yourselves. There is no excuse for your profound ignorance with all of the free content available to you.

Ben Shapiro: The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay | PragerU

Do you understand the Constitution? What makes America different? Ben Shapiro joins Michael Knowles to discuss The Federalist Papers, a collection of essays…

www.prageru.com

I would not read the Federalist Papers to get the full story of the Constitution because Hamilton and Madison who wrote them, were for a strong central government. From the point of view of people like Jefferson, the federal government was to be severely restricted. For example, most founders would have said a standing army, the War on Drugs, 3 Strikes, FDA, DEA, and AMA were not legal.

 

[P@triot]

The constitution is fine as a guideline,

No it’s not, snowflake. It’s the law. Literally the law. It is not a “guideline”.

If the majority votes for something, that should be it, the constitution be damned.

1. The US Constitution literally says the polar opposite

2. So if the majority says all liberals should be executed because it is in the best interest of the US, “thats should be it, constitution be damned”?

If you’re not the most ignorant person on the planet, I don’t know who is

 

[miketx]

The constitution is fine as a guideline,

No it’s not, snowflake. It’s the law. Literally the law. It is not a “guideline”.

If the majority votes for something, that should be it, the constitution be damned.

1. The US Constitution literally says the polar opposite

2. So if the majority says all liberals should be executed because it is in the best interest of the US, “thats should be it, constitution be damned”?

If you’re not the most ignorant person on the planet, I don’t know who is

joeb is the apotheosis of a lying cheating shill.

 

[JoeB131]

1. The US Constitution literally says the polar opposite

Nope, it really doesn't

2. So if the majority says all liberals should be executed because it is in the best interest of the US, “thats should be it, constitution be damned”?

Why do you always go for the most absurd example you can find? Probably because you know your argument is weak.

Most people are fine with the big programs you don't like, and they don't really care that some Dead Slave Rapists didn't think of them.

 

[P@triot]

2. So if the majority says all liberals should be executed because it is in the best interest of the US, “that should be it, constitution be damned”?

Why do you always go for the most absurd example you can find?

Because your position is outrageously absurd. Stooping to your level and throwing it back at you, not only dumbs it down enough for you to understand it, but it allows you to paint yourself into a corner leaving you absolutely nowhere to go.

Which is why you had no response to that question. You lack the humility to admit you were wrong (or lied) but anything else would expose you were wrong (or lied) via the hypocrisy required to disagree.

That simple sentence proves that everything you said is 100% wrong. The US Constitution was designed to put the rights of the individual above the needs of the collective and to protect the minority from the majority. You would know had your dumb ass taken a few minutes out of your life to watch the video.

 

[P@triot]

1. The US Constitution literally says the polar opposite

Nope, it really doesn't

It really does, high school dropout. Nowhere in the US Constitution does it state "constitution be damned". Nowhere. In fact, the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution establishes it as the supreme law of the land. As in - nothing supersedes it. Nothing.

You're out of your league here son. Take your bullshit pipe dreams somewhere else. We only deal in facts here.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

The bad news is......

The time for wasting your breath arguing with Communists and anti-Americans is past

The Good news is.....

It's time to stop negotiating and compromising with them as they will destroy your Constitution and your nation without a doubt....and defend your freedom

Take the personal oath now.....that you will defend your God given rights at all costs......then stick to it.

 

[JoeB131]

Because your position is outrageously absurd. Stooping to your level and throwing it back at you, not only dumbs it down enough for you to understand it, but it allows you to paint yourself into a corner leaving you absolutely nowhere to go.

Oh, okay. I thought it was because you are a crazy person who can't rationally discuss policy.

That simple sentence proves that everything you said is 100% wrong. The US Constitution was designed to put the rights of the individual above the needs of the collective and to protect the minority from the majority. You would know had your dumb ass taken a few minutes out of your life to watch the video.

Okay, that and $5.00 will get you a coffee at Starbucks.

The reality is, ALL human society has always been a balance between the collective good vs. the individual want, from the time the tribe threw the first guy they didn't like to the Saber Tooth Tiger so the rest of the tribe could get away.

Which is why I don't waste my time on silly stuff by people who think that human development should have ended when a bunch of slave rapists didn't want to pay their taxes.

 

[danielpalos]

...the left is on it. Biden got elected over the right wing's reality tv guy who had more fantasy than reality.

 

[P@triot]

Which is why I don't waste my time on silly stuff by people who think that human development should have ended when a bunch of slave rapists didn't want to pay their taxes.

Actually, the reality is the US Constitution is the law. So it really doesn’t matter whether you like it or not.

 

[P@triot]

Folks, this comment right here sums up the left and why they are so disgusting.

The reality is, ALL human society has always been a balance between the collective good vs. the individual want, from the time the tribe threw the first guy they didn't like to the Saber Tooth Tiger so the rest of the tribe could get away.

Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Adolf Hitler, Fidel Castro - they all believe that the mass-murder of citizens is justified. Even good.

 

[P@triot]

Biden got elected over the right wing's reality tv guy who had more fantasy than reality.

You mean President Trump? The man who restored constitutional government? Who eliminated all of the unconstitutional Executive Orders of Obama?

Meanwhile, Biden violated the Emoluments Clause. 47 years in office and he’s a millionaire while your dumb ass scrapes by on welfare.

 

[justinacolmena]

You spend your life steeped in welfare, away from the real world. For example, there has never been an OS that isn't susceptible to malware and there never will be. Not MAC OS. Not iOS. Not Android (which actually had over 55,000 security flaws). Not Blackberry OS. Not Linux. Not Unix. Nothing. It has never happened.

Don't be such a Bolshevik. We've got a hacked judicial system running on 100% Microsoft® all the way to the Supreme Court.

The rest just achieved "security through obscurity". Since nobody owned them, hackers didn't care about them. Since Windows ran on 95% of the world's computers, hackers made it their only target.

And why do you think your dirty Windoze® tricks don't work on other operating systems such as Linux?
GNU/Linux is Free and Open Source Software with full disclosure of vulnerabilities.
Fast fixes are available via software updates. No need to wait for Patch Tuesday.

 

[justinacolmena]

“Naturalization” is a synonym for “immigration” you fucking high school dropout.

There are few finer points of law here before you grab our papers at the border and fuck our lives over like that, you hacked 9/11 patriot.

 

[P@triot]

And why do you think your dirty Windoze® tricks don't work on other operating systems such as Linux?

You answered your own question...

That’s like asking why a Ford F-150 engine block doesn’t fit in a Kia

 

[Dragonlady]

The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....

Beyond the controversial ways stingray technology works, the secrecy and deception law enforcement agencies use to cloak their use of the devices is also troubling. Law enforcement agencies around the country have routinely used the devices without obtaining a warrant from judges. In cases where they did obtain a warrant, they often deceived judges about the nature of the technology they planned to use. Instead of telling judges that they intended to use a stingray or cell site simulator, they have often mischaracterized the technology, describing it as a pen register device instead.

Hacker Lexicon: Stingrays, the Spy Tool the Government Tried, and Failed, to Hide

All of the discusions the American right has about the American Constitution has about as much validity as religious arguments about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

The document was written nearly 250 years ago, by a colonial white males living in an agrarian world before the Industrial Revolution, for a small nation spread out along the East Coast of the United States. It has been amended and added to, but not nearly enough to keep up with a changing world.

And always Conservatives will say "What did the Founders intend". It doesn't matter what the Founders intended if it is no longer applicable to today's world, and the way the human race lives in the 21st Century. The problems the Constitution was written to solve and/or prevent, are not the problems you have to deal with today. And then they try to project conservative views on a group of men who were the flaming revolutionary leftists of their time.

Many of the constitutional problems faced today weren't even considered in the establishment of the nation. Instead of trying to paste this 250 year old national blueprint for a mainly coastal agrarian nation of 3 million people, on this massive industrialized nation of 330 million people, is not working well for you.

Time to look ahead and forge a new idea of who America is now, rather than look back and try to project 21st Century politics and thinking on 18th Century men.

 

[Dragonlady]

The liberterian idea of constitutional government is a government that is powerless to do the will of the people and does only shit that they want. Liberterians and far right conservatives are a bunch of fascist assholes. Simply meaning that they think by the people means that the government should be so limited that the people shouldn't be able to elect a government that does more then sit on its dick.

This rant by this vintage libtard is simply priceless. In his infinite ignorance (mixed with his infinite fear that the right will pull his government gravy train away from him and - gasp! - expect him to provide for himself like a big boy), he contradicts himself.

Fascism | Definition of Fascism by Merriam-Webster
Merriam-Webster › dictionary › fascism
Definition of fascism for Students. : a political system headed by a dictator in which the government controls business and labor and opposition is not permitted.

Well, if the right wants a "powerless" government that is the exact opposite of "fascism" in which the government wields unlimited power to control everything. Yes folks...libtards really are this stupid.

The right doesn't want a powerless government. Far from it. They want a police state. No opposition permitted. Trump wanted to send troops in to restore order. Barr had federal forces pulling protestors off the street in unmarked vans, to terrorize and suppress protest.

 

[Dragonlady]

And why do you think your dirty Windoze® tricks don't work on other operating systems such as Linux?

You answered your own question...

That’s like asking why a Ford F-150 engine block doesn’t fit in a Kia

You have no reading comprehension at all. She asked why the hackers can't get into other operating systems, not why the malware they write for one system doesn't work other systems. Only Microsoft systems get hacked. Apple doesn't get hacked either.

They have all these tricks and no Microsoft system is safe from them, but they can't get into other operating systems.