Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Utahs roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules
The tall crosses memorializing fallen Utah Highway Patrol troopers will not come down anytime soon even though a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that they violate the U.S. Constitution.
The decision, which holds implications for roadside memorial crosses across the nation, likely will be appealed by the state and the nonprofit group that erected themonuments.
They could either ask the full 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Wednesdays ruling by a three-judge panel of the Denver-based circuit court striking down a lower federal court decision was applauded by those who want to keep church and state separate and decried by those who see it as another nudge pushing religion out of the public square.
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
Completely separate issues.
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
So, you are saying it's not at ground zero??????
Can you please provide evidence?
Or are you going with the AP dictate that they no longer call it the ground zero mosque, because it angers people?
We can't have crosses along highway, but we have a Mosque at ground zero!!!!!!
Utah’s roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules
The tall crosses memorializing fallen Utah Highway Patrol troopers will not come down anytime soon — even though a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that they violate the U.S. Constitution.
The decision, which holds implications for roadside memorial crosses across the nation, likely will be appealed by the state and the nonprofit group that erected themonuments.
They could either ask the full 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Wednesday’s ruling by a three-judge panel of the Denver-based circuit court — striking down a lower federal court decision — was applauded by those who want to keep church and state separate and decried by those who see it as another nudge pushing religion out of the public square.
Utah?s roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules | The Salt Lake Tribune
I know what liberals will say: But, but but, that's PUBLIC PROPERTY, and the mosque is on PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Yeah, PUBLIC PROPERTY THAT WE PAY FOR WITH OUR TAXES.
But Saudi Arabia and Iran help pay for a mosque at ground zero???????? NO PROBLEM!!!!!!!!
THIS is the liberal idea of "freedom of religion" in the USofA.
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
So, you are saying it's not at ground zero??????
Can you please provide evidence?
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
So, you are saying it's not at ground zero??????
Can you please provide evidence?
Or are you going with the AP dictate that they no longer call it the ground zero mosque, because it angers people?
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
So, you are saying it's not at ground zero??????
Can you please provide evidence?LOL!!!!!!!
Only you 'Baggers would (actually) expect someone to prove a negative!!!!
Completely separate issues.
Really????????
Liberals tell us this is a "freedom of religion" issue!
How is it separate???
Because one is about Christianity and one is about Islam?
Because one is politically correct and one is not?
Because one (highway) is paid for with our tax dollars, and the other is paid for with funds that could be from Iran???
Do tell how the issues are separate?
Utahs roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules
The tall crosses memorializing fallen Utah Highway Patrol troopers will not come down anytime soon even though a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that they violate the U.S. Constitution.
The decision, which holds implications for roadside memorial crosses across the nation, likely will be appealed by the state and the nonprofit group that erected themonuments.
They could either ask the full 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Wednesdays ruling by a three-judge panel of the Denver-based circuit court striking down a lower federal court decision was applauded by those who want to keep church and state separate and decried by those who see it as another nudge pushing religion out of the public square.
Utah?s roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules | The Salt Lake Tribune
I know what liberals will say: But, but but, that's PUBLIC PROPERTY, and the mosque is on PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Yeah, PUBLIC PROPERTY THAT WE PAY FOR WITH OUR TAXES.
But Saudi Arabia and Iran help pay for a mosque at ground zero???????? NO PROBLEM!!!!!!!!
THIS is the liberal idea of "freedom of religion" in the USofA.
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
Ditto.Utahs roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules
The tall crosses memorializing fallen Utah Highway Patrol troopers will not come down anytime soon even though a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that they violate the U.S. Constitution.
The decision, which holds implications for roadside memorial crosses across the nation, likely will be appealed by the state and the nonprofit group that erected themonuments.
They could either ask the full 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Wednesdays ruling by a three-judge panel of the Denver-based circuit court striking down a lower federal court decision was applauded by those who want to keep church and state separate and decried by those who see it as another nudge pushing religion out of the public square.
Utah?s roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules | The Salt Lake Tribune
I know what liberals will say: But, but but, that's PUBLIC PROPERTY, and the mosque is on PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Yeah, PUBLIC PROPERTY THAT WE PAY FOR WITH OUR TAXES.
But Saudi Arabia and Iran help pay for a mosque at ground zero???????? NO PROBLEM!!!!!!!!
THIS is the liberal idea of "freedom of religion" in the USofA.
You're calling anyone who supports one but opposes the other a hypocrite?
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
So, you are saying it's not at ground zero??????
Can you please provide evidence?
Or are you going with the AP dictate that they no longer call it the ground zero mosque, because it angers people?
You've never even been to Ground Zero so what the fuck do you know?
Utahs roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules
The tall crosses memorializing fallen Utah Highway Patrol troopers will not come down anytime soon even though a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that they violate the U.S. Constitution.
The decision, which holds implications for roadside memorial crosses across the nation, likely will be appealed by the state and the nonprofit group that erected themonuments.
They could either ask the full 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Wednesdays ruling by a three-judge panel of the Denver-based circuit court striking down a lower federal court decision was applauded by those who want to keep church and state separate and decried by those who see it as another nudge pushing religion out of the public square.
Utah?s roadside memorial crosses have to go, court rules | The Salt Lake Tribune
I know what liberals will say: But, but but, that's PUBLIC PROPERTY, and the mosque is on PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Yeah, PUBLIC PROPERTY THAT WE PAY FOR WITH OUR TAXES.
But Saudi Arabia and Iran help pay for a mosque at ground zero???????? NO PROBLEM!!!!!!!!
THIS is the liberal idea of "freedom of religion" in the USofA.
When we see people say "Mosque AT Ground Zero", how can we take anything they say seriously. Starting with a lie pretty much shuts down anything else you might say.
So, you are saying it's not at ground zero??????
Can you please provide evidence?
Or are you going with the AP dictate that they no longer call it the ground zero mosque, because it angers people?
