Watergate vs. Benghazi Test

LOL, poor rw.

All you REALLY wrote is that you choose to believe what the CIA who answers to this administration says about it because it fits the narrative that protects President Fuck Up.




^^^ What a hack.

The Obama administration orchestrated a misinformation campaign to conceal the involvement of Al Qaeda in a terrorist attack prior to the election. This, in combination with the epic fail of Obama's foreign and military policy and the tragic (and avoidable) deaths of four Americans, is far worse than Watergate.

Interesting.....I imagine you have proof

All proof indicates the CIA was in charge of releasing information. They either had inaccurate information or chose not to release the full story immediately. Barring any proof on your part, all you have is another rightwing conspiracy theory

How did your Fast and Furious conspiracy work out for you? Or your seven year Clinton Whitewater investigation?

This is what Republicans do when they are not in power
 
Please explain how the Watergate coverup constituted "high crimes and misdemeanors" whereas the Benghazi coverup (including withholding requested security protection) did not:

For starters..breaking, entering and stealing stuff is a crime.

Secondly..there was no Benghazi coverup.

Thirdly..one has to wonder why the rightwing is so interested in the unfortunate deaths of 4 Americans while they completely ignored the deaths of over 4000 Americans in Iraq.

:eusa_eh:

No one on the right is ignoring the sacrifice our men made in Iraq or anywhere. But we are not so dispicable to use them as you do.

The Pseudo-cons were dispicable enough to use the deaths of 3000+ souls on 9-11 to invade Iraq and caused an unknown number of innocent deaths.

Oh, the investigation into the botched Watergate break-in, uncovered a list of impeachable crimes by President Nixon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top