Washington Post: Hillary Rapidly Losing Support From Dems/Independents.

[WelfareQueen]

More fall out from the latest round of polling data. Per the Washington Post....Hillary has awful support numbers among Independents who generally decide elections.

Per the Washington Post:

"Clinton has lost support among independents. In March, 45 percent had a favorable view and 44 percent had an unfavorable view, for a net approval rating of +1 point. That has now fallen to -14 points (37 percent-51 percent)."


And her support from Democrats:


"Even more striking is that Clinton has lost support among Democrats. In March, her net favorability rating was +59 points (78 percent-19 percent). It is now +50 percent (72 percent-22 percent)."


The writer....(it being the Washington Post) tries to spin the numbers, but even he acknowledges things are bad for the Hildabeast. Sad.


Hillary Clinton s poll numbers are falling. Among Democrats. - The Washington Post

 

[Meathead]

Sleaze factor.

 

[Sonny Clark]

More fall out from the latest round of polling data. Per the Washington Post....Hillary has awful support numbers among Independents who generally decide elections.

Per the Washington Post:

"Clinton has lost support among independents. In March, 45 percent had a favorable view and 44 percent had an unfavorable view, for a net approval rating of +1 point. That has now fallen to -14 points (37 percent-51 percent)."


And her support from Democrats:


"Even more striking is that Clinton has lost support among Democrats. In March, her net favorability rating was +59 points (78 percent-19 percent). It is now +50 percent (72 percent-22 percent)."


The writer....(it being the Washington Post) tries to spin the numbers, but even he acknowledges things are bad for the Hildabeast. Sad.


Hillary Clinton s poll numbers are falling. Among Democrats. - The Washington Post

Great news. May the support continue to fall ..... all the way down to ZERO .....

 

[aaronleland]

The data from independents isn't surprising. Hillary just isn't very likable.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Lots of time before the election boys, and the GOP insanity-fest has only begun.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

and children

Why do Dems hate Children?

Tone-deaf Clinton campaign throws kids off playground New York Post

"According to the park’s website, a specially planned event for tots called Imagination Playground — which features unique blue building blocks — has been canceled to accommodate the Democratic front-runner for president."

 

[The Rabbi]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

There is no one else, not of her stature.

 

[The Rabbi]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

There is no one else, not of her stature.

Yeah but Eliot Spitzer and Alcee Hastings come close.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

There is no one else, not of her stature.

Yeah but Eliot Spitzer and Alcee Hastings come close.

Who? Oh right, no one.

 

[Katzndogz]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

Dimwitocrats should stick with Hillary.

 

[WelfareQueen]

The data from independents isn't surprising. Hillary just isn't very likable.

Aaron.....she really is not likable. I agree with you.

Her husband....yes.....Obama....yes. Reagan was likable. I think both Bush's were decent men who were generally liked as people.

But Hillary.........no.

The Dems need to get Elizabeth Warren in the race. I think many of her more socialist views are bat-shit crazy....(e.g. "You didn't build that")...but at least she seems to be a likable person.

I don't see Americans electing someone who is inherently unlikable. Not that is can't happen....but not likely imho.

 

[mikegriffith1]

More fall out from the latest round of polling data. Per the Washington Post....Hillary has awful support numbers among Independents who generally decide elections.

Per the Washington Post:

"Clinton has lost support among independents. In March, 45 percent had a favorable view and 44 percent had an unfavorable view, for a net approval rating of +1 point. That has now fallen to -14 points (37 percent-51 percent)."


And her support from Democrats:


"Even more striking is that Clinton has lost support among Democrats. In March, her net favorability rating was +59 points (78 percent-19 percent). It is now +50 percent (72 percent-22 percent)."


The writer....(it being the Washington Post) tries to spin the numbers, but even he acknowledges things are bad for the Hildabeast. Sad.


Hillary Clinton s poll numbers are falling. Among Democrats. - The Washington Post

Romney won the Independent vote in 2012 but still lost the election. Why? Because the two lowest income groups--the least educated and least successful voting blocks--went for Obama in tidal-wave numbers.

Anyway, it's far too early to be putting much stock in favorable/unfavorable ratings. There is still an eternity to go before the general election. If Hillary's numbers are still low and start sinking again next August or later, then she'll have something to worry about. On the other hand, perhaps some rational Dems are starting to realize that Hillary is a compulsive liar with no core principles aside from ambition and greed.

 

[The Rabbi]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

Dimwitocrats should stick with Hillary.

They're damned if they do, damned if they dont. They have no one else of her standing. And she is a guaranteed loser.
Democrats face a total wipe out in the 2016 election. They got shellacked in 2010, they barely held on in 2012, other than the presidency, and they were kicked to the curb in 2014. In 2016 they stand to lsoe every national office and probably most of the winnable state ones as well. They will be in control of failed cities like Chicago and Detroit and states like CA and NY.

 

[WelfareQueen]

More fall out from the latest round of polling data. Per the Washington Post....Hillary has awful support numbers among Independents who generally decide elections.

Per the Washington Post:

"Clinton has lost support among independents. In March, 45 percent had a favorable view and 44 percent had an unfavorable view, for a net approval rating of +1 point. That has now fallen to -14 points (37 percent-51 percent)."


And her support from Democrats:


"Even more striking is that Clinton has lost support among Democrats. In March, her net favorability rating was +59 points (78 percent-19 percent). It is now +50 percent (72 percent-22 percent)."


The writer....(it being the Washington Post) tries to spin the numbers, but even he acknowledges things are bad for the Hildabeast. Sad.


Hillary Clinton s poll numbers are falling. Among Democrats. - The Washington Post

Romney won the Independent vote in 2012 but still lost the election. Why? Because the two lowest income groups--the least educated and least successful voting blocks--went for Obama in tidal-wave numbers.

You are exactly right. Blacks and Hispanics for the first time voted in higher percentages than whites in order to elect the first black President. Good for them.

I don't think any reasonable person believes minorities will turn out again in record numbers for a rich, old, out-of-touch white woman.

Will Dems get the majority of minority votes? Sure....but I would guess about 3 to 4 million less than Obama.

If that is the case, Hillary likely loses.

 

[WelfareQueen]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

Dimwitocrats should stick with Hillary.

They're damned if they do, damned if they dont. They have no one else of her standing. And she is a guaranteed loser.
Democrats face a total wipe out in the 2016 election. They got shellacked in 2010, they barely held on in 2012, other than the presidency, and they were kicked to the curb in 2014. In 2016 they stand to lsoe every national office and probably most of the winnable state ones as well. They will be in control of failed cities like Chicago and Detroit and states like CA and NY.

See post above. Without overwhelming minority turnout in 2012 Obama would not be re-elected.

Again....does any reasonable person think the Hildabeast will get the same number of black and hispanic votes as Obama?

Exactly.....I didn't think so.

 

[The Rabbi]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

Dimwitocrats should stick with Hillary.

They're damned if they do, damned if they dont. They have no one else of her standing. And she is a guaranteed loser.
Democrats face a total wipe out in the 2016 election. They got shellacked in 2010, they barely held on in 2012, other than the presidency, and they were kicked to the curb in 2014. In 2016 they stand to lsoe every national office and probably most of the winnable state ones as well. They will be in control of failed cities like Chicago and Detroit and states like CA and NY.

See post above. Without overwhelming minority turnout in 2012 Obama would not be re-elected.

Again....does any reasonable person think the Hildabeast will get the same number of black and hispanic votes as Obama?

Exactly.....I didn't think so.

You are correct, of course. Hillary has zero appeal among minorities. That's partly why It hink she is toast.

 

[WelfareQueen]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

Dimwitocrats should stick with Hillary.

They're damned if they do, damned if they dont. They have no one else of her standing. And she is a guaranteed loser.
Democrats face a total wipe out in the 2016 election. They got shellacked in 2010, they barely held on in 2012, other than the presidency, and they were kicked to the curb in 2014. In 2016 they stand to lsoe every national office and probably most of the winnable state ones as well. They will be in control of failed cities like Chicago and Detroit and states like CA and NY.

See post above. Without overwhelming minority turnout in 2012 Obama would not be re-elected.

Again....does any reasonable person think the Hildabeast will get the same number of black and hispanic votes as Obama?

Exactly.....I didn't think so.

You are correct, of course. Hillary has zero appeal among minorities. That's partly why It hink she is toast.

Yeah....can you picture a 22 year old black dude in Compton or Detroit going....."Yeah! Let's elect that rich old white woman!!!"

 

[SwimExpert]

More fall out from the latest round of polling data. Per the Washington Post....Hillary has awful support numbers among Independents who generally decide elections.

Per the Washington Post:

"Clinton has lost support among independents. In March, 45 percent had a favorable view and 44 percent had an unfavorable view, for a net approval rating of +1 point. That has now fallen to -14 points (37 percent-51 percent)."


And her support from Democrats:


"Even more striking is that Clinton has lost support among Democrats. In March, her net favorability rating was +59 points (78 percent-19 percent). It is now +50 percent (72 percent-22 percent)."


The writer....(it being the Washington Post) tries to spin the numbers, but even he acknowledges things are bad for the Hildabeast. Sad.


Hillary Clinton s poll numbers are falling. Among Democrats. - The Washington Post

B-but, I thought she was the heir apparent?

 

[bripat9643]

If the Dems could produce a credible alternative she'd be complete toast. Most people are sticking with her because they've got no one else.

There is no one else, not of her stature.

She has the same stature as Al Capone.